Arbitrariness: Why the Most Importance Idea in Administrative Law Can't Be Defined, and What This Means for the Law in General

dc.contributor.authorWright, R. George
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-22T19:44:01Z
dc.date.available2020-09-22T19:44:01Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractBriefly, I will argue that understanding arbitrariness in the law requires an understanding of the conflict between "invariantist" and "contextualist" approaches to the idea of the arbitrary. Contextualism, as I shall define it below, offers the best available understanding of how the idea of arbitrariness actually functions in the law. As we better understand the forms of contextualism, we then understand better the context-dependent multiple meanings of arbitrary. In turn, better understanding the idea of arbitrariness helps us better understand the murkiness and contestedness of the law in general.en_US
dc.identifier.citation44 University of Richmond Law Review 839en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/23917
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleArbitrariness: Why the Most Importance Idea in Administrative Law Can't Be Defined, and What This Means for the Law in Generalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Arbitrariness Why the Most Importance Idea in Administrative Law Can't Be Defined and What This Means for the Law in General.pdf
Size:
3.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: