Op/Ed: Marion County health agency's SCOTUS case could end protections for most vulnerable

If you need an accessible version of this item, please submit a remediation request.
Date
2022-11-06
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
The Indianapolis Star
Abstract

The Health & Hospital Corp. (HHC) v. Talevski case arises out of allegations that Gorgi Talevski, a disabled person with dementia who resided at a long-term care facility owned by HHC, was kept in physical restraints in violation of a federal law ― the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act (FNHRA). HHC has responded not only that its use of restraints did not violate the FNHRA, but Talevski’s wife Ivanka (who is bringing the lawsuit on behalf of the estate of her now deceased husband) should not be able to sue at all. HHC goes so far as to argue the Supreme Court should overturn two existing rulings, which would mean that Talevski and other disabled patients would not be able to sue at all under the act. This request, if granted, would result in extraordinary damage to the rights, health and welfare of Hoosiers — and of all vulnerable Americans.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Jane Hartsock, Gabriel Bosslet, & Jamie Levine Daniel. (2022, November 6). Op/Ed: Marion County health agency’s SCOTUS case could end protections for most vulnerable. The Indianapolis Star. https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/2022/11/06/marion-county-health-agency-supreme-court-protections-scotus/69621191007/
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Other
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}