Effectiveness of GentleWave CleanFlow on Multispecies Endodontic Biofilm Removal in Single Rooted Extracted Teeth

dc.contributor.advisorSpolnik, Kenneth J.
dc.contributor.authorBeswick, Adam J.
dc.contributor.otherMovila, Alexandru
dc.contributor.otherGregory, Richard L.
dc.contributor.otherEhrlich, Ygal
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-10T08:37:57Z
dc.date.available2024-06-10T08:37:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-06
dc.degree.date2024
dc.degree.disciplineSchool of Dentistryen
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen
dc.degree.levelM.S.D.
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: One of the challenges of non-surgical root canal treatment is disinfection. Bacterial biofilms adhere to canal walls and invade the intricate anatomy present within root canal systems. Traditional irrigation methods are unable to deliver irrigation solutions to all parts of the canal system. The GentleWave system is an advanced irrigation method designed to improve irrigation and disinfection, ultimately leading to more successful root canal outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the GentleWave CleanFlow posterior instrument’s ability to remove a multispecies biofilm from a single canaled extracted tooth compared to traditional irrigation techniques. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six single rooted premolar teeth with single canals were prepared to a uniform size, instrumented to size 25.06 and inoculated with a multispecies bacterial biofilm taken from an adult tooth with pulpal necrosis. Teeth were incubated and biofilm established before teeth were disinfected. Three disinfection groups included: GentleWave irrigation using the Posterior CleanFlow Procedure Instrument on the necrotic tooth cycle, standard needle irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 8% EDTA, and needle irrigation with sterile water. Following treatment, canals were swabbed and plated on blood agar plates and incubated for 48 hours when colony forming units were counted. Results: Both GW and standard needle irrigation demonstrated significantly lower CFU/mL than the negative control (p<0.001). However, the GW and positive control groups were not significantly different from one another (p=0.132). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the GentleWave Posterior CleanFlow procedure instrument does not exhibit improved biofilm removal compared to standard needle irrigation. However, based on mixed results when comparing this study to previous GentleWave biofilm removal studies, it is clear that more research is necessary. Future studies should considering using a multispecies biofilm, the GentleWave CleanFlow procedure instrument and multiple techniques to assess biofilm removal.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/41305
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectEndodontics
dc.subjectBiofilm
dc.subjectGentleWave
dc.subject.meshBiofilms
dc.subject.meshDisinfection
dc.subject.meshEdetic Acid
dc.subject.meshRoot Canal Irrigants
dc.subject.meshRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subject.meshSodium Hypochlorite
dc.titleEffectiveness of GentleWave CleanFlow on Multispecies Endodontic Biofilm Removal in Single Rooted Extracted Teeth
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Adam Beswick Masters Thesis.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: