A Simulation Pre-Brief Scaffold to Support Clinical Judgment and Independence in Clinical Judgment Decision Making

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2024-01
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Chair
Degree
Ph.D.
Degree Year
2024
Department
School of Nursing
Grantor
Indiana University
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract

It is essential that nurses independently assume patient care, yet new nurses lack necessary clinical judgment skills. The purpose of this study was to examine a simulation pre-brief scaffold to support nursing students’ clinical judgment development and clinical judgment independence. The pre-brief experiential learning scaffold for clinical judgment independence (PELS-CJI) framework informed simulation pre-brief in this experimental study. A convenience sample included traditional and accelerated Bachelor of Science in nursing students in their senior year. Participants were randomly assigned to complete a simulation pre-brief with or without the Interactive-Video Recorded Simulation (I-VRS). Nursing student’s total clinical judgment and individual components of clinical judgment (noticing, interpreting, and responding) in simulation were measured by a single evaluator blinded to condition using the Lasater clinical judgment rubric (LCJR) (Cronbach’s alpha .932). To measure clinical judgment independence, the number of unintended conceptual cues during simulation were counted. Participants in the intervention group had higher clinical judgment scores during simulation (n = 31, M = 28.45, SD = 5.163) as compared to the control group (n = 36, M = 25.06, SD = 5.275), t(65) = -2.653, p < .01. A significant relationship for the noticing and responding subscales of clinical judgment was observed between groups, but not for the interpreting subscale. No significant difference in the number of unintended cues was found between groups. Results support that using an I-VRS in simulation pre-brief enhanced clinical judgment in simulation. The use of the I-VRS adds to the existing limited evidence related to simulation pre-brief to support clinical judgment development among undergraduate nursing students. Future research using an I-VRS during pre-brief is necessary to determine if improvement in clinical judgment is retained and transferrable to the clinical setting. Additional testing of the PELS-CJI to guide simulation pre-brief is encouraged.

Description
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Dissertation
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}