Browsing by Subject "transitions of care"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Crossing the Communication Chasm: Challenges and Opportunities in Transitions of Care from the Hospital to the Primary Care Clinic
    (Elsevier, 2017-03) Rattray, Nicholas A.; Sico, Jason J.; Cox, LeeAnn M.; Russ, Alissa L.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Frankel, Richard M.; Anthropology, School of Liberal Arts
    Background Transitions of care from specialty and acute settings to primary care abound. Compared to the continuity in end-of-shift handoffs, care transitions involve provider communication between practices and facilities with their own cultures and bureaucracies. Using the transition from acute care to outpatient primary care for stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients as a case study, this qualitative research explored communication practices and institutional arrangements among clinical providers responsible for longitudinal management of hypertension. In this study, researchers investigated the barriers and facilitators of effective communication between acute stroke/TIA inpatient and primary care providers at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Methods A multidisciplinary team conducted consensus-based coding and thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with 21 clinical providers (9 with primary responsibilities for inpatient care and 12 with primary responsibilities in outpatient, primary care). Results Thematic analysis of responses identified three factors that influenced communication between clinical providers: (1) consistent, concise but complete medication and treatment plans; (2) reliable, standardized discharge documentation; (3) use of multiple modes of communication. Participants identified cultural barriers, including challenges with rotating providers at a teaching hospital and local discharge practices. Conclusion Ambiguity about who is being handed off to and time pressures in the acute setting may lead inpatient providers to give lower priority to discharge communication, leaving outpatient providers with low-quality information. While electronic templates have standardized key components of discharge documentation, improvement opportunities remain. Increased awareness of the challenges and opportunities on each side of the care transfer could foster communication practices that systematically account for the information needs of inpatient and outpatient providers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluation of a “Meds-to-Beds” program on 30-day hospital readmissions
    (ACCP, 2020-05) Zillich, Alan J.; Jaynes, Heather A.; Davis, Hannah B.; Lantaff, Wendy M.; Myers, Jaclyn; Perkins, Susan M.; Shan, Mu; Snyder, Margie E.; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    Background Effective programs for transitional care from hospital to home are needed to improve patient outcomes. Purpose To evaluate readmissions among patients who received a medication discharge program compared with control patients who did not receive the program. Methods This was a retrospective, observational cohort study during a 1-year period in a medium-sized Midwestern health system. The “meds-to-beds” program consisted of a pharmacist and/or technician delivering patient's medications to bedside prior to discharge. When indicated, the pharmacist provided medication counseling, reviewed discharge medications, and provided an updated medication list to patients. The intervention cohort was defined as all hospitalized patients eligible for and opting into the “meds-to-beds” program. The control cohort was defined as hospitalized patients eligible for the program who did not opt-in to receive it. Data were collected through both a retrospective chart review and an administrative claims data warehouse. The primary outcome was defined as any 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes were defined as any preventable 30-day readmissions using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's potentially avoidable hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions classification. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the odds of 30-day readmissions between the intervention and control groups. Results Data were collected for 500 intervention and 1591 control patients. Both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, race, co-morbid conditions, and previous health care utilization. In the multivariable model, all-cause readmissions within 30 days were not significantly different between the intervention and control groups (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.07, P = .09). The most common preventable readmissions were for pneumonia (43.2%), heart failure (18.9%), and dehydration (16.2%). In the multivariable model, patients in the intervention group were less likely to be readmitted for a preventable cause within 30-days than patients in the control group (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28-0.89, P = .02). Conclusion This “meds-to-beds” program was not associated with a significant reduction in 30-day all-cause readmissions but was associated with a reduction in 30-day preventable hospital readmissions.