Browsing by Subject "rosiglitazone"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Slowing Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes: Latest Advances
    (Association of Kenya Physicians, 2007) Otieno, C. F.; Association of Kenya Physicians Scientific Conference (11th : Mar. 2007 : Eldoret, Kenya)
    Background: Largest head-to-head, double-blind study of metformin, glyburide and rosiglitazone (N = 4,360). Primary objective: To compare the durability of glycemic control using rosiglitazone versus metformin or glyburide as initial monotherapy in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Design: Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Inclusion criteria: Type 2 diabetes ≤ 3 years, drug-naive, male and female, aged 30–75 years, FPG 126–180 mg/dl (7–10 mmol/l). Exclusion criteria: Previous use of glucose-lowering therapy, women of child-bearing potential, significant hepatic disease, renal impairment, unstable or severe angina, known CHF (NYHA Class I–IV), uncontrolled hypertension. Treatment duration: Treatment period: 4 to 6 years. Median duration of treatment: 4 years (rosiglitazone and metformin); 3.3 years (glyburide). Interventions: Rosiglitazone, metformin, glyburide.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Thiazolidinediones, Cardiovascular Disease and Cardiovascular Mortality: Translating Research Into Action For Diabetes (TRIAD)
    (2010-07) Bilik, Dori; McEwen, Laura N.; Brown, Morton B.; Selby, Joe V.; Karter, Andrew J.; Marrero, David G.; Hsiao, Victoria C.; Tseng, Chien-Wen; Mangione, Carol M.; Lasser, Norman L.; Crosson, Jesse C.; Herman, William H.
    Background Studies have associated thiazolidinedione (TZD) treatment with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and questioned whether the two available TZDs, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, have different CVD risks. We compared CVD incidence, cardiovascular (CV), and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetic patients treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone as their only TZD. Methods We analyzed survey, medical record, administrative, and National Death Index (NDI) data from 1999 through 2003 from Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD), a prospective observational study of diabetes care in managed care. Medications, CV procedures, and CVD were determined from health plan (HP) administrative data, and mortality was from NDI. Adjusted hazard rates (AHR) were derived from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, history of diabetic nephropathy, history of CVD, insulin use, and HP. Results Across TRIAD's 10 HPs, 1,815 patients (24%) filled prescriptions for a TZD, 773 (10%) for only rosiglitazone, 711 (10%) for only pioglitazone, and 331 (4%) for multiple TZDs. In the seven HPs using both TZDs, 1,159 patients (33%) filled a prescription for a TZD, 564 (16%) for only rosiglitazone, 334 (10%) for only pioglitazone, and 261 (7%) for multiple TZDs. For all CV events, CV, and all-cause mortality, we found no significant difference between rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. Conclusions In this relatively small, prospective, observational study, we found no statistically significant differences in CV outcomes for rosiglitazone- compared to pioglitazone-treated patients. There does not appear to be a pattern of clinically meaningful differences in CV outcomes for rosiglitazone- versus pioglitazone-treated patients. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.