Browsing by Subject "primary care provider"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care: Results of a Randomized Trial
    (Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2013-04-05) Rawl, Susan M.; Christy, Shannon M.; Perkins, Susan; Tong, Yan; Krier, Connie; Wang, Hsiao-Lan; Champion, Victoria L.; Myers, Laura Jones; Imperiale, Thomas; Willis, Deanna; Rhyant, Broderick; Springston, Jeffrey; Skinner, Celette Sugg
    Aims: The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare rates of self-reported colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and forward movement in stage of adoption at 6 months post-intervention. African American primary care patients (n=595) who were eligible for CRC screening were randomly assigned to receive a computer-delivered tailored CRC screening intervention (n=286) or a non-tailored screening brochure (n=309) prior to their scheduled visit with their primary care provider. Hypotheses were that differences between groups would be observed in proportions of patients who: 1) completed fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) or colonoscopy; and 2) had moved forward in stages of adoption for these tests. Methods: Participants completed baseline and 6-month telephone interviews; interventions were delivered prior to primary care provider visits. Differences between groups were examined using chi-square tests, predictors of screening were determined using logistic regression models. Results: In the computer-tailored group, the FOBT completion rate was 12.6% compared to 7.8% in the brochure group (p=0.05). The colonoscopy completion rate was 17.5% in the computer group vs. 15.2% in the brochure group (p=0.45). Forward stage movement for FOBT was observed in 28.4% of the computer groups vs. 20.8% in the brochure group (p=0.03). Forward stage movement for colonoscopy was 38.5% in the computer group and 36.8% (p=0.68) in each group, respectively. Conclusions: The computer-tailored intervention was more effective than the brochure at increasing FOBT completion and movement toward action. More research is needed to explain why the tailored intervention was not more effective at increasing colonoscopy completion and to identify moderators of intervention efficacy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Unexplained Practice Variation in Primary Care Providers' Concern for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    (APA, 2018) Honaker, Sarah; Dugan, Tamara; Daftary, Ameet; Davis, Stephanie; Saha, Chandan; Baye, Fitsum; Freeman, Emily; Downs, Stephen; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Objective To examine primary care provider (PCP) screening practice for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and predictive factors for screening habits. A secondary objective was to describe the polysomnography (PSG) completion proportion and outcome. We hypothesized that both provider and child health factors would predict PCP suspicion of OSA. Methods A computer decision support system that automated screening for snoring was implemented in five urban primary care clinics in Indianapolis, Indiana. We studied 1086 snoring children between 1 and 11 years seen by 26 PCPs. We used logistic regression to examine the association between PCP suspicion of OSA and child demographics, child health characteristics, provider characteristics, and clinic site. Results PCPs suspected OSA in 20% of snoring children. Factors predicting PCP concern for OSA included clinic site (p < .01; OR=0.13), Spanish language (p < .01; OR=0.53), provider training (p=.01; OR=10.19), number of training years (p=.01; OR=4.26) and child age (p<.01), with the youngest children least likely to elicit PCP concern for OSA (OR=0.20). No patient health factors (e.g., obesity) were significantly predictive. Proportions of OSA suspicion were variable between clinic sites (range 6% to 28%) and between specific providers (range 0% to 63%). Of children referred for PSG (n=100), 61% completed the study. Of these, 67% had OSA. Conclusions Results suggest unexplained small area practice variation in PCP concern for OSA amongst snoring children. It is likely that many children at-risk for OSA remain unidentified. An important next step is to evaluate interventions to support PCPs in evidence-based OSA identification.