- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "percutaneous nephrolithotomy"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Ambulatory PCNL may be cost-effective compared to Standard PCNL(Mary Ann Liebert, 2021) Lee, Matthew S.; Assmus, Mark A.; Agarwal, Deepak; Rivera, Marcelino E.; Large, Tim; Krambeck, Amy; Urology, School of MedicineAbstract Background COVID-19 changed the practice of medicine in America. During the March 2020 lockdown, elective cases were cancelled to conserve hospital beds/resources resulting in financial losses for health systems and delayed surgical care. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (aPCNL) has been shown to be safe and could be a strategy to: ensure patients receive care that has been delayed, conserve hospital resources, and maximize cost-effectiveness. We aimed to compare the safety and cost-effectiveness of patients undergoing ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (aPCNL) against standard PCNL (sPCNL). Materials and Methods 98 patients underwent PCNL at Indiana University Methodist hospital, a tertiary referral center, by three expert surgeons from January 2020 to September 2020. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the 30-day rates of ED-visits, readmissions, and complications between sPCNL and aPCNL. Secondary outcomes included: cost analysis and stone free rates (SFRs). Prospensity-score matching was performed to ensure the groups were balanced. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 using independent t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square analyses for categorical variables. Results 98 patients underwent PCNL during the study period (sPCNL=75 and aPCNL=23). After propensity-score matching, 42 patients were available for comparison (sPCNL=19 and aPCNL=23). We found no difference in 30-day ED-visits, readmissions, or complications between the two groups. aPCNL resulted in cost savings of $5327±442 per case. Stone free rates were higher for aPCNL compared to sPCNL. Conclusions aPCNL appears safe to perform and does not have a higher rate of ED-visits or readmissions compare to sPCNL. aPCNL may also be cost-effective compared to sPCNL.Item The Circle Nephrostomy Tube: An Attractive Nephrostomy Drainage System Following Complex Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(Elsevier, 2017-05) El Tayeb, Marawan M.; Borofsky, Michael S.; Lingeman, James E.; Urology, School of MedicineObjective To describe our experience with the circle nephrostomy tube (NT) (Cook Medical), a drainage system uniquely designed for use after multiple-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Methods A retrospective review of 1317 consecutive patients undergoing 1599 PNLs at IU Health Methodist Hospital was performed. All multiple access cases utilizing circle NTs were reviewed and analyzed. The method of insertion of circle NT was demonstrated. Results A total of 1843 accesses were obtained in 1599 renal units (RUs): 380 upper pole, 129 interpolar, and 1334 lower pole. Multiple accesses in this series were required in 282 RUs (17.6%). Following multiple-access PNL, circle NTs, Cope loop, and reentry Malecot NTs were inserted in 91 RUs (32.3%), 208 RUs (73.8%), and 31 RUs (11%), respectively. None of the patients who had circle NT experienced clogging, dislodgement, or obstruction of the tube. The cost of circle, Cope loop, and Malecot NTs are 121.73 USD, 95.20 USD, and 81 USD, respectively. Conclusion Circle NTs are easy to insert, secure, cost-effective compared with inserting two NTs. Circle NTs provide excellent drainage and facilitate secondary procedures.Item Electromagnetic Guided Percutaneous Renal Access Outcomes Among Surgeons and Trainees of Different Experience Levels: A Pilot Study(Elsevier, 2020-02) Borofsky, Michael S.; Rivera, Marcelino E.; Dauw, Casey A.; Krambeck, Amy E.; Lingeman, James E.; Urology, School of MedicineObjective To determine feasibility of an electromagnetic (EM) guidance system (Auris Health, Redwood City, CA) in obtaining percutaneous renal access among urologists and trainees of different experience levels. EM-guidance is appealing for access as it allows real time, 3-dimensional targeting without radiation. Few studies have explored this for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and none have assessed its potential to decrease the learning curve in obtaining access using traditional techniques. Methods Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval was obtained to compare EM-guided percutaneous access to fluoroscopic guided access in a porcine model. Voluntary participants included urology trainees and faculty. They were categorized as beginner (no prior primary percutaneous nephrolithotomyexperience), intermediate (10-100 prior) and advanced (>100). Each participant attempted an EM and fluoroscopic guided puncture. Primary outcome was successful puncture. Secondary outcomes included access time, fluoroscopy time, and number of attempts. Participants were limited to 3 attempts and 10 minutes total to obtain access using each technique. Results Fourteen participants (6 beginners, 4 intermediates, and 4 experts) attempted 28 punctures. Overall success using EM-guidance was 93% compared to 71% using fluoroscopy ( P = .33). EM punctures had shorter access times (85 vs 255 seconds, P <.01) required fewer attempts (1 vs 2, P = .04) and had decreased associated fluoroscopy times (1 vs 96 seconds, P <.01) excluding the initial retrograde pyelogram and guidance of the ureteroscope to the desired calyx. Beginners showed comparable success rates and outcomes relative to experts despite higher access times. Conclusion EM-guidance is a promising new technique to decrease the learning curve of percutaneous access with high success rates and minimal radiation.Item In Vivo Renal Tubule pH in Stone Forming Human Kidneys(Liebert, 2019) Borofsky, Michael S.; Handa, Rajash K.; Evan, Andrew P.; Williams, James C., Jr.; Bledsoe, Sharon; Coe, Fredric L.; Worcester, Elaine M.; Lingeman, James E.; Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of MedicineIntroduction: There is evidence that patients with a history of ileostomies who make acidic urine and form uric acid or calcium oxalate stones may plug some collecting ducts with calcium phosphate (CaP) and urate crystals. This is a paradoxical finding as such minerals should not form at an acid pH. One possible explanation is the presence of acidification defects due to focal damage to inner medullary collecting duct and duct of Bellini (BD) cells. We sought to further investigate this hypothesis through direct measurement of ductal pH in dilated Bellini ducts in patients with ileostomies undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stone removal. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, we used a fiber-optic pH microsensor with a 140 µm diameter tip to measure intraluminal pH from the bladder, saline irrigant and dilated BD’s of patients undergoing PCNL. Results: Measurements were taken from three patients meeting inclusion criteria. Measured pH of bladder urine ranged from 4.97 – 5.58 and pH of saline irrigant used during surgery ranged from 5.17 – 5.75. BD measurements were achieved in 11 different BDs. Mean intraductal BD pH was more than 1 unit higher than bulk urine (6.43 ± 0.22 vs. 5.31 ± 0.22, p<0.01). Conclusions: This is the first evidence for focal acidification defects within injured/dilated BD of human kidneys producing a highly acidic bulk phase urine. These results may help explain the paradoxical finding of CaP and urate plugs in dilated ducts of patients with stone forming diseases characterized by highly acidic urine.Item Initial Clinical Experience with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(Liebert, 2019) Nottingham, Charles U.; Large, Tim; Cobb, Kaitlan; Sur, Roger L.; Canvasser, Noah; Stoughton, Christa L.; Krambeck, Amy E.; Urology, School of MedicineIntroduction and Objective: Current available lithotrites have clinical stone clearance rates averaging 24 to 32 mm2/minute. The objective of this study was to critically evaluate the initial experience with the Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy lithotrite during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with a minimum of 15 mm of stone in axial diameter at three locations (Indiana University, University of California Davis, and University of California San Diego) scheduled to undergo PCNL for nephrolithiasis over a 60-day trial period. We assessed objective measures of stone clearance time, stone clearance rate, device malfunction, stone-free rate, and complications. Each surgeon also evaluated subjective parameters from each case related to the use of Trilogy on a 1 to 10 scale (10 = extremely effective), and compared it with their usual lithotrite on a 1 to 5 scale (5 = much better). Results: We included 43 patients and had 7 bilateral (16.3%) cases, for a total of 50 renal units. One case was a mini-PCNL. Two cases experienced device malfunctions requiring troubleshooting but no transition to another lithotrite. The mean stone clearance rate was 68.9 mm2/minute. The stone-free rate on postoperative imaging was 67.6% (25 of 37 patients with available imaging). The lowest subjective rating was the ergonomic score of 6.7, and the highest subjective rating was the ease of managing settings score of 9.2. The surgeon impressions of ultrasound (7.3), ballistics (8.1), combination of ultrasound and ballistics (8.7), and suction (8.4) were high. One patient experienced an intraoperative renal pelvis perforation, one patient required a blood transfusion, one patient had a pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement, and one patient had a renal artery pseudoaneurysm requiring endovascular embolization. Conclusions: This multi-institutional study evaluated a new and efficient combination lithotrite that was perceived by surgeons to be highly satisfactory, with an excellent safety and durability profile.Item Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the 80 Years of Age and Older Population(Elsevier, 2019) Abedali, Zain A.; Large, Tim; Heiman, Joshua M.; Bandali, Elhaam; Anderson, Blake B.; Lingeman, James E.; Krambeck, Amy E.; Urology, School of MedicineObjective To evaluate feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex nephrolithiasis in patients 80 years of age and older compared to younger individuals. Methods From an institutional IRB-approved database, 1,647 patients were identified who underwent PCNL from 1999 to 2019. Patients were stratified by age: group 1 (20-59), group 2 (60-79), and group 3 (>80). Statistics were performed using chi-square and ANOVA to compare outcomes. Results Of the 1,647 patients, median age was 46, 66, and 83, respectively ( P <0.0001). Three patients within group 3 were 90 or older. Females made up 54%, 46%, 56% of patients ( P = 0.02). Average stone size with SD was 2.6 ± 2.2, 2.5 ± 2.3, 2.2± 1.9 cm for each group ( P = 0.06). Mean preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) was significantly lower in the 80+ group (13.8, 13.4, 13.1 g/dL, P <.0001). Change in Hgb was not significantly different. There were more Clavien II-IV complications (10.4, 14.4, 28.8%; P = 0.02) and transfusions (2.3, 4.7, 10.2%; P <0.001) in the elderly. The most common complications in the 80+ group were bleeding related (10.1%). No difference in readmission rates or ICU admissions was noted. Conclusion PCNL is feasible in the extremely elderly; however with a higher rate of complications and longer hospitalizations. No long-term sequelae or deaths in the 80 and older cohort were seen. This study allows us to appropriately counsel older patients on a realistic postoperative course and supports use of PCNL as the best means of long-term survival.Item Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Superobese: A Comparison of Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index(Liebert, 2016) Dauw, Casey A.; Borofsky, Michael S.; York, Nadya; Lingeman, James E.; Department of Urology, IU School of MedicineIntroduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the gold standard for treatment of large renal calculi. Although several investigators have examined the feasibility and outcomes associated with PCNL in obese patients, these studies have been limited by small sample size, lack of a comparator group, or few patients at body mass index (BMI) extremes. We thus compared outcomes of superobese (BMI >50) patients undergoing PCNL vs both an “overweight” and “ideal” cohort. Methods: We used a prospectively maintained database to identify ideal (BMI 18.5–25), overweight (BMI 25.1–49.9), and superobese (BMI ≥50) patients who underwent PCNL. Our primary objective was to compare surgical outcomes between groups measured by the percent of patients who required secondary PCNL. We then compared complication rates, need for transfusion, and length of stay (LOS) using chi-square testing and ANOVA where appropriate. Results: A total of 1152 patients were identified of which 254 were classified as ideal, 840 as overweight, and 58 as superobese. The overweight cohort had a higher mean age and greater proportion of males, whereas staghorn stones were more common in the superobese group. Comorbid conditions were more commonly observed in the superobese cohort. Otherwise, the groups were similar. Surgical outcomes were comparable with 47.2%, 42.0%, and 38.0% of ideal, overweight, and superobese patients requiring secondary PCNL (p = 0.25) with no difference in complication rates, need for transfusion, or LOS. Conclusion: PCNL can be effectively and safely performed in superobese patients with no difference in surgical outcomes or complications when compared to ideal or overweight patient cohorts.Item Randomized controlled trial comparing three different modalities of lithotrites for intracorporeal lithotripsy in pcnl(Liebert, 2017) York, Nadya E.; Borofsky, Michael S.; Chew, Ben H.; Dauw, Casey A.; Paterson, Ryan F.; Denstedt, John D.; Razvi, Hassan; Nadler, Robert B.; Humphreys, Mitchell R.; Preminger, Glenn M.; Nakada, Stephen Y.; Krambeck, Amy E.; Miller, Nicole L.; Terry, Colin; Rawlings, Lori D.; Lingeman, James E.; Department of Urology, School of MedicinePurpose: To compare the efficiency (stone fragmentation and removal time) and complications of three models of intracorporeal lithotripters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: Prospective, randomized controlled trial at nine centers in the North America from 2009 to 2016. Patients were randomized to one of three lithotripter devices: the Cyberwand, a dual probe ultrasonic device; the Swiss Lithoclast Select, a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic device; and the StoneBreaker, a portable pneumatic device powered by CO2 cartridges. Since the StoneBreaker lacks an ultrasonic component, it was used with the LUS‐II ultrasonic lithotripter to allow fair comparison with combination devices. Results: 270 patients were enrolled, 69 were excluded after randomization. 201 patients completed the study: 71 in the Cyberwand group, 66 in the Lithoclast Select, and 64 in the StoneBreaker group. The baseline patient characteristics of the three groups were similar. Mean stone surface area was smaller in the StoneBreaker group at 407.8mm2 vs 577.5mm2 (Lithoclast Select) and 627.9mm2 (Cyberwand). The stone clearance rate was slowest in the StoneBreaker group at 24.0 mm2/min vs 28.9 mm2/min and 32.3 mm2/min in the Lithoclast Select and Cyberwand groups respectively. After statistically adjusting for the smaller mean stone size in the StoneBreaker group, there was no difference in the stone clearance rate among the three groups (p=0.249). Secondary outcomes, including complications and stone free rates, were similar between the groups. Conclusions: The Cyberwand, Lithoclast Select, and the StoneBreaker lithotripters have similar adjusted stone clearance rates in PCNL for stones > 2cm. The safety and efficacy of these devices are comparable.Item A Survey Regarding Preference in the Management of Bilateral Stone Disease and a Comparison of Clavien Complication Rates in Bilateral vs Unilateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy(Elsevier, 2017) Rivera, Marcelino E.; Bhojani, Naeem; Heinsimer, Kevin; El Tayeb, Marawan M.; Paonessa, Jessica E.; Krambeck, Amy E.; Lingeman, James E.; Urology, School of MedicineObjective To discuss complications of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SB-PCNL) when compared with unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy and survey surgeon preference in bilateral stone disease management. Patients and Methods A database of all participating percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) patients who underwent treatment at Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital within a 10-year period from 2006 to 2015 by a single surgeon (JL) was utilized. Perioperative data, as well as complications, defined according to the Clavien grading system, were recorded. A survey of members of the Endourological Society was performed regarding surgical management in the setting of bilateral stone disease. Results A total of 563 patients were identified over the study period with 129 undergoing SB-PCNL. Overall, SB-PCNL patients had a longer procedure (176.9 vs 115.6 minutes, P <.0001), were more likely to undergo a secondary procedure (73% vs 44, P <.001), and had a longer hospital stay (3.2 vs 2.3 days, P <.001). Notably, there were no differences in the number or the severity of complications between the 2 groups. A total of 153 endourologists completed the survey. Of these endourologists, 58 (38%) performed bilateral PCNL under anesthesia. The top reasons for electing not to perform bilateral PCNLs included the duration of bilateral procedures (53%), bilateral renal injury (48%), and rare performance of bilateral surgery (35%). Conclusion Although the procedure length was longer in the SB-PCNL group, there were similar rates of complications and severity between unilateral PCNL and SB-PCNL. A majority of endourologists surveyed do not perform bilateral PCNL but would perform bilateral ureteroscopy with the duration of the procedure and concern for bilateral renal injury representing the most common reasons.