ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "pancreatic cancer prevention"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EUS-Guided Pancreatic Cyst Ablation: a Clinical and Technical Review
    (Springer, 2019-05) Moyer, Matthew T.; Maranki, Jennifer L.; DeWitt, John M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose of Review Pancreatic cystic lesions represent a growing public health dilemma, particularly as our population ages and cross-sectional imaging becomes more sensitive. Mucinous cysts carry a clinically significant risk of developing pancreatic cancer, which carries an extremely poor prognosis. Determining which cysts will develop cancer may be challenging, and surgical resection of the pancreas carries significant morbidity. The goal of this paper is to review the rationale for cyst ablation and discuss prior and current research on cyst ablation techniques and efficacy. Indications, contraindications, and factors related to optimal patient selection are outlined. Recent Findings Endoscopic ultrasound-guided chemoablation of pancreatic cysts has been performed in neoplastic cysts, with varying levels of efficacy. Safety concerns arose due to the risk of pancreatitis in alcohol-based treatments; however, the most recent data using a non-alcohol chemoablation cocktail suggests that ablation is effective without the need for alcohol, resulting in a significantly more favorable adverse event profile. Summary Endoscopic ultrasound-guided chemoablation of neoplastic pancreatic cysts is a promising, minimally invasive approach for treatment of cysts, with recent significant advances in safety and efficacy, suggesting that it should play a role in the treatment algorithm.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pancreatic Cyst Fluid Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A and Carcinoembryonic Antigen: A Highly Accurate Test for the Diagnosis of Serous Cystic Neoplasm
    (Elsevier, 2017-07) Carr, Rosalie A.; Yip-Schneider, Michele T.; Dolejs, Scott; Hancock, Bradley A.; Wu, Huangbing; Radovich, Milan; Schmidt, C. Max; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background Accurate differentiation of pancreatic cystic lesions is important for early detection and prevention of pancreatic cancer, as well as avoidance of unnecessary surgical intervention. Serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) have no malignant potential, but can mimic the following premalignant mucinous cystic lesions: mucinous cystic neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). We recently identified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A as a novel pancreatic fluid biomarker for SCN. We hypothesize that combining cyst fluid CEA with VEGF-A will improve the diagnostic accuracy of VEGF-A. Methods Pancreatic cyst/duct fluid was collected from consenting patients undergoing surgical cyst resection with corresponding pathologic diagnoses. Pancreatic fluid VEGF-A and CEA levels were detected by ELISA. Results One hundred and forty-nine patients with pancreatic cystic lesions met inclusion criteria. Pathologic diagnoses included pseudocyst (n = 14), SCN (n = 26), mucinous cystic neoplasm (n = 40), low-/moderate-grade IPMN (n = 34), high-grade IPMN (n = 20), invasive IPMN (n = 10), and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (n = 5). Vascular endothelial growth factor A was significantly elevated in SCN cyst fluid compared with all other diagnoses (p < 0.001). With a threshold of >5,000 pg/mL, VEGF-A alone has 100% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity to distinguish SCNs from other cystic lesions. With a threshold of ≤10 ng/mL, CEA alone identifies SCN with 95.5% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity. Sensitivity and specificity of the VEGF-A/CEA combination are 95.5% and 100%, respectively. The c-statistic increased from 0.98 to 0.99 in the receiver operating characteristic analysis when CEA was added to VEGF-A alone. Conclusions Although VEGF-A alone is a highly accurate test for SCN, the combination of VEGF-A with CEA approaches the gold standard for pathologic diagnosis, importantly avoiding false positives. Patients with a positive test indicating benign SCN can be spared a high-risk surgical pancreatic resection.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University