Browsing by Subject "p-tau"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Blood Biomarkers from Research Use to Clinical Practice: What Must Be Done? A Report from the EU/US CTAD Task Force
    (Springer, 2022) Angioni, D.; Delrieu, J.; Hansson, O.; Fillit, H.; Aisen, P.; Cummings, J.; Sim, J. R.; Braunstein, J. B.; Sabbagh, M.; Bittner, T.; Pontecorvo, M.; Bozeat, S.; Dage, J. L.; Largent, E.; Mattke, S.; Correa, O.; Gutierrez Robledo, L. M.; Baldivieso, V.; Willis, D. R.; Atri, A.; Bateman, R. J.; Ousset, P-J.; Vellas, B.; Weiner, M.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Timely and accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in clinical practice remains challenging. PET and CSF biomarkers are the most widely used biomarkers to aid diagnosis in clinical research but present limitations for clinical practice (i.e., cost, accessibility). Emerging blood-based markers have the potential to be accurate, cost-effective, and easily accessible for widespread clinical use, and could facilitate timely diagnosis. The EU/US CTAD Task Force met in May 2022 in a virtual meeting to discuss pathways to implementation of blood-based markers in clinical practice. Specifically, the CTAD Task Force assessed: the state-of-art for blood-based markers, the current use of blood-based markers in clinical trials, the potential use of blood-based markers in clinical practice, the current challenges with blood-based markers, and the next steps needed for broader adoption in clinical practice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Correction: Diagnostic and prognostic performance to detect Alzheimer's disease and clinical progression of a novel assay for plasma p-tau217
    (BMC, 2022-06-13) Groot, Colin; Cicognola, Claudia; Bali, Divya; Triana‑Baltzer, Gallen; Dage, Jeffrey L.; Pontecorvo, Michael J.; Kolb, Hartmuth C.; Ossenkoppele, Rik; Janelidze, Shorena; Hansson, Oskar; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Erratum for: Diagnostic and prognostic performance to detect Alzheimer's disease and clinical progression of a novel assay for plasma p-tau217. Groot C, Cicognola C, Bali D, Triana-Baltzer G, Dage JL, Pontecorvo MJ, Kolb HC, Ossenkoppele R, Janelidze S, Hansson O. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 May 14;14(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01005-8. PMID: 35568889
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Diagnostic and prognostic performance to detect Alzheimer's disease and clinical progression of a novel assay for plasma p-tau217
    (BMC, 2022-05-14) Groot, Colin; Cicognola, Claudia; Bali, Divya; Triana‑Baltzer, Gallen; Dage, Jeffrey L.; Pontecorvo, Michael J.; Kolb, Hartmuth C.; Osssenkoppele, Rik; Janelidze, Shorena; Hansson, Oskar; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Recent advances in disease-modifying treatments highlight the need for accurately identifying individuals in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) stages and for monitoring of treatment effects. Plasma measurements of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) are a promising biomarker for AD, but different assays show varying diagnostic and prognostic accuracies. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical performance of a novel plasma p-tau217 (p-tau217) assay, p-tau217+Janssen, and perform a head-to-head comparison to an established assay, plasma p-tau217Lilly, within two independent cohorts. METHODS: The study consisted of two cohorts, cohort 1 (27 controls and 25 individuals with mild-cognitive impairment [MCI]) and cohort 2 including 147 individuals with MCI at baseline who were followed for an average of 4.92 (SD 2.09) years. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to assess the performance of both assays to detect amyloid-β status (+/-) in CSF, distinguish MCI from controls, and identify subjects who will convert from MCI to AD dementia. General linear and linear mixed-effects analyses were used to assess the associations between p-tau and baseline, and annual change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Spearman correlations were used to assess the associations between the two plasma measures, and Bland-Altmann plots were examined to assess the agreement between the assays. Results: Both assays showed similar performance in detecting amyloid-β status in CSF (plasma p-tau217+Janssen AUC = 0.91 vs plasma p-tau217Lilly AUC = 0.89), distinguishing MCI from controls (plasma p-tau217+Janssen AUC = 0.91 vs plasma p-tau217Lilly AUC = 0.91), and predicting future conversion from MCI to AD dementia (plasma p-tau217+Janssen AUC = 0.88 vs p-tau217Lilly AUC = 0.89). Both assays were similarly related to baseline (plasma p-tau217+Janssen rho = -0.39 vs p-tau217Lilly rho = -0.35), and annual change in MMSE scores (plasma p-tau217+Janssenr = -0.45 vs p-tau217Lillyr = -0.41). Correlations between the two plasma measures were rho = 0.69, p < 0.001 in cohort 1 and rho = 0.70, p < 0.001 in cohort 2. Bland-Altmann plots revealed good agreement between plasma p-tau217+Janssen and plasma p-tau217Lilly in both cohorts (cohort 1, 51/52 [98%] within 95%CI; cohort 2, 139/147 [95%] within 95%CI). Conclusions: Taken together, our results indicate good diagnostic and prognostic performance of the plasma p-tau217+Janssen assay, similar to the p-tau217Lilly assay.