Browsing by Subject "memantine"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evaluating High-Dose Rivastigmine Patch in Severe Alzheimer’s Disease: Analyses with Concomitant Memantine Usage as a Factor
    (Bentham Science, 2015) Grossberg, George T.; Farlow, Martin R.; Meng, Xiangyi; Velting, Drew M.; Department of Neurology, IU School of Medicine
    Background: ACTION, a 24-week, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study in patients with severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD), demonstrated significant efficacy of 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) and Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living scale–Severe Impairment Version (ADCS-ADL-SIV). Overall, 61% of the study population received at least 1 dose of concomitant memantine, regardless of dose or duration. This retrospective analysis investigated the effects of concomitant memantine on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch. Methods: Patients were stratified according to whether or not they received at least one dose of concomitant memantine during the double-blind phase. Changes from baseline on the SIB and ADCS-ADL-SIV were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, pooled center, memantine usage and treatment-by-memantine as factors, and baseline as a covariate. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Results: Memantine-treated patients were younger than those not receiving memantine (mean 75.9 and 78.8 years, respectively), with a lower screening Mini-Mental State Examination (8.6 and 9.2, respectively). ANCOVA confirmed there was no significant interaction (p>0.1) between study treatment and memantine use on the SIB or ADCS-ADL-SIV. The incidence of adverse events was: 71.4%, 13.3 mg/24 h patch with memantine; 79.7%, 13.3 mg/24 h patch alone; 74.7%, 4.6 mg/24 h patch with memantine; and 71.1%, 4.6 mg/24 h patch alone. Conclusion: These data suggest benefit of 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch, regardless of concomitant memantine use. The incidence of adverse events with highdose patch was similar in memantine-treated patients and those not receiving memantine.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EVALUATION OF GENE REGULATION AND THERAPEUTIC DRUGS RELATED TO ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE IN DEGENERATING PRIMARY CEREBROCORTICAL CULTURES
    (2012-03-16) Bailey, Jason A.; Lahiri, Debomoy K.; Du, Yansheng; McBride, William J., 1956-; Zhou, Feng
    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurological disorder defined by the presence of plaques comprised mostly of amyloid-β (Aβ), and neurofibrillary tangles consisting of hyperphosphorylated microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT). AD is also characterized by widespread synapse loss and degeneration followed by death of neurons in the brain. Inflammatory processes, such as glial activation, are also implicated. In order to study mechanisms of neurodegeneration and evaluate potential therapeutic agents that could slow or reverse this process, a tissue culture system was developed based on primary embryonic cerebrocortical neurons. This culture system was observed to exhibit time-dependent neurodegeneration, glial proliferation, and synaptic marker loss consistent with AD-affected brains. The regulatory promoter regions of several genes implicated in AD, including the Aβ precursor protein (APP), β-amyloid cleaving enzyme (BACE1), and MAPT, were studied in this culture model. The MAPT gene promoter activity followed the pattern of neuronal maturation and degeneration quite closely, increasing in the initial phase of the tissue culture, then reducing markedly during neurodegeneration while APP and BACE1 gene promoters remained active. Deletion series of these promoters were tested to give an initial indication of the active regions of the gene promoter regions. Furthermore, the effects of exogenous Aβ and overexpression of p25, which are two possible pathogenic mechanisms of gene regulation in AD, were studied. Response to Aβ varied between the promoters and by length of the Aβ fragment used. Overexpression of p25 increased MAPT, but not APP or BACE1, promoter activity. This neurodegeneration model was also used to study the putative neuroprotective action of the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine. Treatment with memantine prevented loss of synaptic markers and preserved neuronal morphology, while having no apparent effect on glial activation. The protective action on synaptic markers was also observed with two other structurally distinct NMDA receptor antagonists, suggesting that the effects of memantine are produced by its action on the NMDA receptor. It is concluded that this tissue culture model will be useful for the study of gene regulation and therapeutic agents for neurodegeneration, and that the efficacy of memantine may result from preservation of synaptic connections in the brain.