Browsing by Subject "medical decision-making"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Influence of Patient Immigrant Status on Provider Diabetes Treatment Decisions: A Virtual Human Experimental Study
    (2020-08) Hsueh, Loretta; Stewart, Jesse C.; Hirsh, Adam T.; Zapolski, Tamika; de Groot, Mary; Mather, Kieren J.
    Immigrants are at elevated risk for not having their diabetes treatment appropriately intensified, likely resulting in poorly-controlled diabetes and increased morbidity and mortality. Immigrant status is a powerful sociodemographic cue, yet its influence on providers’ diabetes treatment decisions is unknown. The study objective was to determine the effect of patient immigrant status on providers’ decisions to (1) take no action, (2) add an oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA), (3) add/switch to insulin, or (4) refer the patient to an endocrinologist. Participants were 140 medical students/professionals (‘providers’). Providers viewed profiles (videos + vignettes) for virtual patients differing in immigrant status (born in Mexico or U.S.; other characteristics held constant). Analyses were completed at the group (‘nomothetic’) and individual (‘idiographic’) levels. Nomothetic results indicated providers were less likely to refer foreign-born patients to endocrinology than U.S.-born patients (p=0.03). No differences were detected for the other three treatment likelihood ratings. Idiographic results indicated that about half of provider decisions were influenced by patient immigrant status (i.e., Cohen’s d≥0.50) across all four treatment decisions. Effect size data show an almost even split between higher treatment ratings for foreign-born vs. U.S.-born patients for three decisions (take no action, add an OHA, add/switch to insulin), explaining why group-level differences for these ratings did not emerge (i.e., they were cancelled out). This study found that providers are less likely to refer foreign-born patients to endocrinology, potentially leading to therapeutic inertia. In addition, half of individual-level provider decisions were meaningfully influenced by patient immigrant status. However, traditional group-level analyses mask these important individual-level differences. These systematic differences in treatment based on non-relevant factors could lead to unintended adverse outcomes for the foreign-born population.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Spiritual and Religious Coping of Medical Decision Makers for Hospitalized Older Adult Patients
    (Liebert, 2019-04) Maiko, Saneta M.; Ivy, Steven; Watson, Beth Newton; Montz, Kianna; Torke, Alexia M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Critically ill adult patients who face medical decisions often delegate others to make important decisions. Those who are authorized to make such decisions are typically family members, friends, or legally authorized representatives, often referred to as surrogates. Making medical decisions on behalf of others produces emotional distress. Spirituality and/or religion provide significant assistance to cope with this distress. We designed this study to assess the role of surrogates' spirituality and religion (S/R) coping resources during and after making medical decisions on behalf of critically ill patients. The study's aim was to understand the role that S/R resources play in coping with the lived experiences and challenges of being a surrogate. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 46 surrogates by trained interviewers. These were audio-recorded and transcribed by research staff. Three investigators conducted a thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews. The codes from inter-rater findings were analyzed, and comparisons were made to ensure consistency. Results: The majority (67%) of surrogates endorsed belief in God and a personal practice of religion. Five themes emerged in this study. Personal prayer was demonstrated as the most important coping resource among surrogates who were religious. Trusting in God to be in charge or to provide guidance was also commonly expressed. Supportive relationships from family, friends, and coworkers emerged as a coping resource for all surrogates. Religious and nonreligious surrogates endorsed coping strategies such as painting, coloring, silent reflection, music, recreation, and reading. Some surrogates also shared personal experiences that were transformative as they cared for their ill patients. Conclusion: We conclude that surrogates use several S/R and other resources to cope with stress when making decisions for critically ill adult patients. The coping resources identified in this study may guide professional chaplains and other care providers to design a patient-based and outcome-oriented intervention to reduce surrogate stress, improve communication, increase patient and surrogate satisfaction, and increase surrogate integration in patient care. We recommend ensuring that surrogates have S/R resources actively engaged in making medical decisions. Chaplains should be involved before, during, and after medical decision making to assess and address surrogate stress. An interventional research-design project to assess the effect of spiritual care on surrogate coping before, during, and after medical decision making is also recommended.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    When Adolescent and Parents Disagree on Medical Plan, Who Gets to Decide?
    (AAP, 2019-08) Hopkins, Kali A.; Ott, Mary A.; Salih, Zeynep; Bosslet, Gabriel T.; Lantos, John; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked autosomal recessive disease affecting 16 to 20 per 100 000 live births.1,2 It is characterized by progressive muscle weakness due to a defect in the dystrophin gene. It typically leads to loss of ambulation by age 8 to 14 years,1 followed by cardiomyopathy and respiratory failure. Historically, adolescents with DMD have died at ∼20 years of age.1–3 As respiratory compromise occurs, patients are supported with noninvasive ventilation (eg, nasal bilevel positive airway pressure).3–6 When this becomes unsuccessful, patients may be candidates for tracheostomy; this often happens in the second or third decade of life.7 The decision of whether to proceed with tracheostomy is complicated and is most often left to the patient and family. Family members do not always agree. We present a case in which acute illness forced a minor and his family to face this decision earlier than is typical. The adolescent desired a tracheostomy to extend his life. The parents did not believe that a tracheostomy was in his best interest and felt that comfort care was the most appropriate approach. Experts comment on the ethical issues raised by medical decision-making in cases involving adolescents and life-and-death decisions.