Browsing by Subject "lung neoplasms"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development and Usability Testing of a Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol
    (JMIR, 2017) Carter-Harris, Lisa; Comer, Robert Skipworth; Goyal, Anurag; Vode, Emilee Christine; Hanna, Nasser; Ceppa, DuyKhanh; Rawl, Susan M.; School of Nursing
    Background: Awareness of lung cancer screening remains low in the screening-eligible population, and when patients visit their clinician never having heard of lung cancer screening, engaging in shared decision making to arrive at an informed decision can be a challenge. Therefore, methods to effectively support both patients and clinicians to engage in these important discussions are essential. To facilitate shared decision making about lung cancer screening, effective methods to prepare patients to have these important discussions with their clinician are needed. Objective: Our objective is to develop a computer-tailored decision support tool that meets the certification criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument version 4.0 that will support shared decision making in lung cancer screening decisions. Methods: Using a 3-phase process, we will develop and test a prototype of a computer-tailored decision support tool in a sample of lung cancer screening-eligible individuals. In phase I, we assembled a community advisory board comprising 10 screening-eligible individuals to develop the prototype. In phase II, we recruited a sample of 13 screening-eligible individuals to test the prototype for usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. In phase III, we are conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 60 screening-eligible participants who have never been screened for lung cancer. Outcomes tested include lung cancer and screening knowledge, lung cancer screening health beliefs (perceived risk, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy), perception of being prepared to engage in a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, occurrence of a patient-clinician discussion about lung cancer screening, and stage of adoption for lung cancer screening. Results: Phases I and II are complete. Phase III is underway. As of July 15, 2017, 60 participants have been enrolled into the study, and have completed the baseline survey, intervention, and first follow-up survey. We expect to have results by December 31, 2017 and to have data analysis completed by March 1, 2018. Conclusions: Results from usability testing indicate that the computer-tailored decision support tool is easy to use, is helpful, and provides a satisfactory experience for the user. At the conclusion of phase III (pilot RCT), we will have preliminary effect sizes to inform a future fully powered RCT on changes in (1) knowledge about lung cancer and screening, (2) perceived risk of lung cancer, (3) perceived benefits of lung cancer screening, (4) perceived barriers to lung cancer screening, (5) self-efficacy for lung cancer screening, and (6) perceptions of being adequately prepared to engage in a discussion with their clinician about lung cancer screening.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development of a Symptom Management Intervention: Qualitative Feedback from Advanced Lung Cancer Patients and their Family Caregivers
    (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2017-01) Mosher, Catherine E.; Ott, Mary A.; Hanna, Nasser; Jalal, Shadia I.; Champion, Victoria L.; IU School of Nursing
    Background: Little is known about cancer patient and family caregiver preferences for the content and format of nonpharmacologic interventions. Revising interventions based on patient and caregiver feedback before implementation may improve intervention feasibility and acceptability, especially in the context of advanced-stage cancer. Objectives: The aim of the study was to obtain feedback from patients with advanced-stage, symptomatic lung cancer and their family caregivers on the content and format of a nonpharmacologic symptom management intervention under development. The intervention blended evidence-based cognitive-behavioral and emotion-focused strategies to reduce physical and psychological symptoms. Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 patients with advanced-stage, symptomatic lung cancer and caregivers. Participants reviewed handouts regarding intervention components and provided feedback. Results: Patients and caregivers desired intervention components that addressed the patient's high symptom burden such as education regarding treatment adverse effects and the provision of various coping tools. Offering interventions with a brief or flexible length and delivering them via telephone were other suggestions for enhancing intervention acceptability. Participants also preferred an equal focus on patient and caregiver concerns and a more positive intervention framework. Conclusions: Intervention preferences of patients with advanced-stage lung cancer and caregivers underscore the severity of the disease and treatment process and the need to adapt interventions to patients with high symptom burden. These preferences may be incorporated into future intervention trials to improve participant recruitment and retention. Implications for Practice: Nurses can modify interventions to meet the needs of patients with advanced-stage, symptomatic lung cancer and caregivers. For example, flexibility regarding intervention content and length may accommodate those with significant symptoms.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Safely and Effectively Evaluating Computed Tomography–detected Lung Lesions. Much Work to Be Done
    (ATS, 2019-11) Burks, A. Cole; Gould, Michael K.; Silvestri, Gerard; Yarmus, Lonny B.; Sears, Catherine R.; Arenberg, Douglas A.; Gonzalez, Anne V.; Slatore, Christopher G.; Tanner, Nichole T.; Vachani, Anil; Nana-Sinkam, Patrick; Fuster, Mark M.; Wahidi, Momen M.; Tanoue, Lynn T.; Rivera, M. Patricia; Medicine, School of Medicine