- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "laparoscopy"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Biliary Bypass with Laparoscopic Choledochoduodenostomy(Springer, 2018-05) Kays, Joshua K.; Koniaris, Leonidas G.; Milgrom, Daniel P.; Nakeep, Attila; Surgery, School of MedicineLaparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy (LCDD) is employed to treat many benign biliary diseases when endoscopic or percutaneous techniques are not feasible. We describe our technique for LCDD, which utilizes common bile duct transection and an end-to-side biliary-enteric anastomosis. This procedure includes the following elements: isolation and transection of the common bile duct, mobilization of the duodenum (Kocher maneuver), inspection of the common bile duct, and end-to-side biliary-enteric anastomosis. Key details and pitfalls are discussed. Over a 5-year period, LCDD was performed on 18 patients. Indications included intractable abdominal pain (10) and choledocholithiasis (8). The majority of patients, 83%, tolerated the operation well with no complications. There was one postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and two anastomotic strictures, one in the immediate postoperative period and the other 9 months after the operation. The median length of stay was 4 days (IQR 3.0–5.3), and there was minimal blood loss. Based on our experience, LCDD with transection and end-to-side biliary-enteric anastomosis is a safe and effective biliary bypass technique.Item A laparoscopic approach to cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy(Elsevier, 2021) Pickett, Charlotte M.; Minalt, Nicole; Higgins, Olivia M.; Bernard, Caitlin; Kasper, Kelly M.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of MedicineCesarean scar pregnancies confer serious risk and severe morbidity. Appropriate management is the key to preventing complications. Although expectant management is usually contraindicated, the ideal combination of medical or surgical treatments is unclear and must be tailored to the patient’s preferences and stability, provider skill, and the available resources. In this article, we present a combined medical and surgical approach that was successfully employed for the termination and excision of a cesarean scar pregnancy at 12 weeks’ gestation in a patient desiring uterine preservation. A video is included, demonstrating the surgical steps of a laparoscopic approach used to safely resect the pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar with minimal blood loss. The management technique described can be utilized to effectively resolve cesarean scar pregnancy, to possibly decrease the risk of recurrence, and preserve future fertility with a minimally invasive outpatient surgery.Item The Novel Use of Different Bupivacaine Preparations with Combined Regional Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in Non‐Opioid Based Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorrhaphy(Elsevier, 2016-11) Eppstein, Andrew C.; Sakamoto, Bryan; Department of Surgery, IU School of MedicineOpioids are important for surgical pain control but may not be appropriate for patients with narcotic abuse histories or opioid intolerance. We describe a laparoscopic bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy performed without perioperative or postoperative narcotics. Postoperative analgesia involves a novel technique using 2 different bupivacaine formulations that act synergistically to avoid lag time and provide extended pain relief during the acute surgical recovery phase.Item A Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial Examining the Return of Urinary Continence After Robot- Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with or without a Small Intestinal Submucosa Bladder Neck Sling(Elsevier, 2016-07) Bahler, Clinton D.; Sundaram, Chandru P.; Kella, Naveen; Lucas, Steven M.; Boger, Michelle A.; Gardner, Thomas A.; Koch, Michael O.; Department of Urology, IU School of MedicinePurpose Urinary continence is a driver of quality of life after radical prostatectomy. In this study we evaluated the impact of a biological bladder neck sling on the return of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods This study compared early continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a sling and without a sling in a 2-group, 1:1, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Patients were blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome was defined as urinary continence (0 to 1 pad per day) at 1 month postoperatively. Inclusion criteria were organ confined prostate cancer and a prostate specific antigen less than 15 ng/ml. Exclusion criteria were any prior surgery on the prostate, a history of neurogenic bladder and history of pelvic radiation. A chi-squared test was used for the primary outcome. Results A total of 147 patients were randomized (control 74, sling 73) and 92% were available for primary end point analysis at 1 month. There were no significant differences in baseline or perioperative data except that operating room time was 20.1 minutes longer for the sling group (p=0.04). The continence rate was similar between the control and sling groups at 1 month (47.1% vs 55.2%, p=0.34) and 12 months (86.7% vs 94.5%, p=0.15), respectively. Adverse events were similar between the control and sling groups (10.8% vs 13.7%, p=0.59). Conclusions The application of an absorbable urethral sling at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was well tolerated with no increase in obstructive symptoms in this randomized trial. However, the sling failed to show a significant improvement in continence.