Browsing by Subject "kidney transplantation"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Adrenocorticotropic Hormone in the Treatment of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Following Kidney Transplantation(Elsevier, 2019-07) Grafals, Mónica; Sharfuddin, Asif; Medicine, School of MedicineThis retrospective study examined the effect of adrenocorticotropic hormone therapy on remission of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in patients with history of kidney transplant (KT) treated at 2 transplant centers. Patients with biopsy-confirmed FSGS following KT who received Acthar Gel (Mallinckrodt ARD, Bedminster, New Jersey, United States) treatment for ≥1 month were eligible. A total of 14 patients with idiopathic FSGS were included. Acthar Gel treatment resulted in complete remission of FSGS in 3 patients and partial remission in 2 patients for a total treatment response rate of 36% (5/14) of patients. Among patients showing complete or partial remission, Acthar Gel treatment duration ranged from 6 months to 2 years and 60% (3/5 patients) had serum creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dL at the start of Acthar Gel treatment. Patient outcomes suggest Acthar Gel may be an effective and tolerable treatment for recurrent FSGS in patients with history of KT. Early initiation of Acthar Gel treatment and therapy duration of at least 6 months may be needed for optimal response to Acthar Gel in patients with history of KT and recurrent FSGS.Item Facing elderly recipients in combined liver-kidney transplantation(Wolters Kluwer, 2020) Ekser, Burcin; Surgery, School of MedicineItem Heme-Oxygenase and Kidney Transplantation: A Potential for Target Therapy?(MDPI, 2020-05-30) Corona, Daniela; Ekser, Burcin; Gioco, Rossella; Caruso, Massimo; Schipa, Chiara; Veroux, Pierfrancesco; Giaquinta, Alessia; Granata, Antonio; Veroux, Massimiliano; Surgery, School of MedicineKidney transplantation is a well-established therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. While a significant improvement of short-term results has been achieved in the short-term, similar results were not reported in the long-term. Heme-oxygenase (HO) is the rate-limiting enzyme in heme catabolism, converting heme to iron, carbon monoxide, and biliverdin. Heme-oxygenase overexpression may be observed in all phases of transplant processes, including brain death, recipient management, and acute and chronic rejection. HO induction has been proved to provide a significant reduction of inflammatory response and a reduction of ischemia and reperfusion injury in organ transplantation, as well as providing a reduction of incidence of acute rejection. In this review, we will summarize data on HO and kidney transplantation, suggesting possible clinical applications in the near future to improve the long-term outcomes.Item Impact of Recipient Age in Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation: Caution Is Needed for Patients ≥70 Years(Wolters Kluwer, 2020-06-01) Ekser, Burcin; Goggins, William C.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mihaylov, Plamen; Mangus, Richard S.; Lutz, Andrew J.; Soma, Daiki; Ghabril, Marwan S.; Lacerda, Marco A.; Powelson, John A.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Surgery, School of MedicineBackground. Elderly recipients (≥70 y) account for 2.6% of all liver transplants (LTs) in the United States and have similar outcomes as younger recipients. Although the rate of elderly recipients in combined liver-kidney transplant (CLKT) is similar, limited data are available on how elderly recipients perform after CLKT. Methods. We have previously shown excellent outcomes in CLKT using delayed kidney transplant (Indiana) Approach (mean kidney cold ischemia time = 53 ± 14 h). Between 2007 and 2018, 98 CLKTs were performed using the Indiana Approach at Indiana University (IU) and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Recipients were subgrouped based on their age: 18–45 (n = 16), 46–59 (n = 34), 60–69 (n = 40), and ≥70 years (n = 8). Results. Overall, more elderly patients received LT at IU (5.2%) when compared nationally (2.6%). The rate of elderly recipients in CLKT at IU was 8.2% (versus 2% Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient). Recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between all age groups except recipient age and duration of dialysis. Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was similar among younger age groups, whereas patient survival was significantly lower in elderly recipients at 1 (60%) and 3 years (40%) (P = 0.0077). Control analyses (replicating Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient’s survival stratification: 18–45, 46–64, ≥65 y) showed similar patient survival in all age groups. Conclusions. Although LT can be safely performed in elderly recipients, extreme caution is needed in CLKT due to the magnitude of operation.Item International Travel for Living Donor Kidney Donation: A Proposal for Focused Screening of Vulnerable Groups(Wolters Kluwer, 2019-07) Hartsock, Jane A.; Helft, Paul R.; Medicine, School of MedicineAs the gap between organ donors and patients on the recipient waiting list grows, residents of the US who are in need of kidney transplantation occasionally contract with living donors from outside the US. Those donors then travel to the US to undergo living donor kidney donation at US transplant centers. This practice is not limited to the US and occurs with some regularity around the world. However, there is very little written about this practice from the perspective of the US transplant system, and there is little in the way of guidance (either legal or ethical) to assist centers that accommodate it in distinguishing between ethically permissible travel for transplant and what could potentially be human trafficking for organ removal. This paper will present an ethical analysis of travel for organ donation with particular attention to lessons that can be drawn from living donor donation in other countries. This inquiry is particularly germane because OPTN has promulgated guidelines with respect to obligations owed to living donors, but those guidelines appear to assume that the donor is a US resident. The critical question then, is whether and/or to what extent those guidelines are applicable to the instant scenario in which the living donor is a non-resident. In addition, this paper addresses several critical ethical concerns implicated by the often vulnerable populations from which donors are drawn. Finally, this paper proposes that focused inquiry by transplant centers is necessary when donors are non-residents.Item A National Survey of Practice Patterns for Accepting Living Kidney Donors With Prior COVID-19(Science Direct, 2021-08-01) Jan, Muhammad Y.; Jawed, Areeba T.; Barros, Nicolas; Adebiyi, Oluwafisayo; Diez, Alejandro; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Goggins, William C.; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Anderson, Melissa D.; Mujtaba, Muhammad A.; Taber, Tim E.; Mishler, Dennis P.; Kumar, Vineeta; Lentine, Krista L.; Sharfuddin, Asif A.; Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction A critical question facing transplant programs is whether, when, and how to safely accept living kidney donors (LKDs) who have recovered from COVID-19 infection. The purpose of the study is to understand current practices related to accepting these LKDs. Methods We surveyed US transplant programs from 3 September through 3 November 2020. Center level and participant level responses were analyzed. Results A total of 174 respondents from 115 unique centers responded, representing 59% of US LKD programs and 72.4% of 2019 and 72.5% of 2020 LKD volume (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network-OPTN 2021). In all, 48.6% of responding centers had received inquiries from such LKDs, whereas 44.3% were currently evaluating. A total of 98 donors were in the evaluation phase, whereas 27.8% centers had approved 42 such donors to proceed with donation. A total of 50.8% of participants preferred to wait >3 months, and 91% would wait at least 1 month from onset of infection to LD surgery. The most common reason to exclude LDs was evidence of COVID-19−related AKI (59.8%) even if resolved, followed by COVID-19−related pneumonia (28.7%) and hospitalization (21.3%). The most common concern in accepting such donors was kidney health postdonation (59.2%), followed by risk of transmission to the recipient (55.7%), donor perioperative pulmonary risk (41.4%), and donor pulmonary risk in the future (29.9%). Conclusion Practice patterns for acceptance of COVID-19−recovered LKDs showed considerable variability. Ongoing research and consensus building are needed to guide optimal practices to ensure safety of accepting such donors. Long-term close follow-up of such donors is warranted.Item Recurrence of Hyperoxaluria and Kidney Disease after Combined Intestine-Kidney Transplantation for Enteric Hyperoxaluria(Karger, 2016-09) Ekser, Burcin; Mangus, Richard S.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Powelson, John A.; Nagaraju, Santosh; Mihaylov, Plamen; Phillips, Carrie L.; Saxena, Romil; Goggins, William C.; Department of Surgery, IU School of MedicineBackground: Enteric hyperoxaluria (EH) occurs with a rate of 5-24% in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, ileal resection and modern bariatric surgery. The excessive absorption of calcium oxalate causes chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with EH. In the literature, a single experience was reported in combined intestine-kidney transplantation (CIKTx) in patients with CKD due to EH. Methods: After a report of 2 successful cases of CIKTx in patients with EH and CKD, one was performed at our center in a 59-year-old Caucasian female who developed intestinal failure with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) dependence after a complication post-bariatric surgery. Before CIKTx, she underwent kidney transplantation alone (KTA) twice, which failed due to oxalate nephropathy. Results: In July 2014, the patient underwent CIKTx and bilateral allograft nephrectomy to avoid EH and oxalate stone burden. The postoperative course was complicated with acute tubular necrosis due to the use of high pressors related to perioperative bleeding. The patient was discharged 79 days after CIKTx with a serum creatinine (sCr) of 1.2 mg/dl and free of TPN. Her sCr increased at 7 months and a renal biopsy showed oxalate nephropathy. SLC26A6 (oxalate transporter) staining was significantly diminished in native duodenum/rectum as well as in intestinal allograft compared to control. Conclusions: KTA in patients with CKD secondary to EH should not be recommended due to high risk of recurrence. Although other centers showed good long-term outcomes in CIKTx, our patient experienced recurrence of EH due to oxalate transporter defect, early kidney allograft dysfunction and prolonged antibiotic use.