Browsing by Subject "journal impact factor"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Linking Health Information Technology to Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review
    (http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/17538157.2012.678451, 2013-01) Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Dixon, Brian E.; McGowan, Julie J.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the scholarly output of grants funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) that published knowledge relevant to the impact of health information technologies on patient safety and quality of care outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a bibliometric analysis of the identified scholarly articles, their journals, and citations. In addition, we performed a qualitative review of the full-text articles and grant documents. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Papers published by AHRQ-funded investigators were retrieved from MEDLINE, journal impact factors were extracted from the 2010 Thompson Reuters Journal Citation Report, citations were retrieved from ISI's Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Seventy-two articles met the criteria for review. Most articles addressed one or more of AHRQ's outcome goals and focus priorities. The average impact factor for the journals was 4.005 (range: 0.654-28.899). The articles, and their respective grants, represented a broad range of health information technologies. CONCLUSIONS: This set of AHRQ-funded research projects addressed the goals and priorities of AHRQ, indicating notable contributions to the scientific knowledge base on the impact of information system use in healthcare.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The selection of high-impact health informatics literature: a comparison of results between the content expert and the expert searcher
    (http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.medlib.iupui.edu/pmc/articles/PMC2706443/, 2009-07) Whipple, Elizabeth C.; McGowan, Julie J.; Dixon, Brian E.; Zafar, Atif
    BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) created the Health IT Bibliography that contains peer-reviewed articles in eleven different health informatics categories. To create the bibliography, informatics experts identified what they considered the seminal articles in each category. METHODS:Using the same eleven categories, an expert searcher (librarian) compiled a list of the "best" health informatics articles using information seeking and retrieval tools. The two sets of articles were then compared using high citation counts as a measure of value. RESULTS: The expert searcher set (8,230) contained more than 3 times the citations to chosen articles compared to the content expert set (2,382). Of 60 articles, 27% of those articles (n = 16) were included in both sets. The frequently cited journals were similar for both sets, and one-third of the same authors were cited in both sets. DISCUSSION: While citation counts and the timeliness of the articles differed in the two sets, the same authors and same journals were frequently present in both sets. CONCLUSION: A best practice for locating high-quality articles may be collaboration between expert searchers and content experts.