Browsing by Subject "job burnout"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Job burnout in mental health providers: A meta-analysis of 35 years of intervention research.
    (APA, 2018) Dreison, Kimberly C.; Luther, Lauren; Bonfils, Kelsey A.; Sliter, Michael T.; McGrew, John H.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Psychology, School of Science
    Burnout is prevalent among mental health providers and is associated with significant employee, consumer, and organizational costs. Over the past 35 years, numerous intervention studies have been conducted but have yet to be reviewed and synthesized using a quantitative approach. To fill this gap, we performed a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of burnout interventions for mental health workers. We completed a systematic literature search of burnout intervention studies that spanned more than 3 decades (1980 to 2015). Each eligible study was independently coded by 2 researchers, and data were analyzed using a random-effects model with effect sizes based on the Hedges’ g statistic. We computed an overall intervention effect size and performed moderator analyses. Twenty-seven unique samples were included in the meta-analysis, representing 1,894 mental health workers. Interventions had a small but positive effect on provider burnout (Hedges’ g = .13, p = .006). Moderator analyses suggested that person-directed interventions were more effective than organization-directed interventions at reducing emotional exhaustion (Qbetween = 6.70, p = .010) and that job training/education was the most effective organizational intervention subtype (Qbetween = 12.50, p < .001). Lower baseline burnout levels were associated with smaller intervention effects and accounted for a significant proportion of effect size variability. The field has made limited progress in ameliorating mental health provider burnout. Based on our findings, we suggest that researchers implement a wider breadth of interventions that are tailored to address unique organizational and staff needs and that incorporate longer follow-up periods.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Predicting mental health provider response to BREATHE, a burnout intervention program
    (2018) Dreison, Kimberly Christine; Salyers, Michelle; McGrew, John; Rand, Kevin; Rollins, Angela
    Within the mental health field, provider burnout is widespread and associated with far-reaching negative outcomes for providers, consumers, and organizations. Over the past four decades, various burnout interventions have been tested and found to be minimally effective, leading several researchers to suggest an increased focus on targeted recruitment (i.e., targeting providers who are most likely to benefit from a particular burnout intervention approach) and/or modifications to the interventions (e.g., format and content). Accordingly, the present study examined several person-related and intervention-related variables that were hypothesized to be predictive of response to BREATHE, a burnout intervention for mental health providers. Data from four prior studies that assessed the effectiveness of the BREATHE intervention were amalgamated. For the primary analyses, hierarchical linear regression was used to determine whether the person-related and/or intervention-related variables were predictive of treatment response. Additionally, the BREATHE studies were examined to determine whether the intervention became less effective at reducing burnout with each subsequent iteration. With respect to person-related predictors of response to the BREATHE intervention, age and turnover intentions were significant. Specifically, younger participants had higher post-intervention levels of depersonalization than older participants (β = -.13, p = .023), and higher baseline intentions to turnover were associated with greater post-intervention levels of emotional exhaustion (β = .11 p = .041) and depersonalization (β = .12, p = .023). In terms of intervention-related predictors of treatment response, participants who received the BREATHE intervention in a multi-session format had higher post-treatment levels of emotional exhaustion than those who received the BREATHE intervention in a single session format (β = .13, p = .015). Notably, across these primary analyses, baseline levels of burnout (i.e., emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment) were consistently the strongest predictors of post-intervention levels of burnout. Lastly, the data suggests that the BREATHE intervention became less effective with subsequent iterations. For example, earlier BREATHE studies had larger effect sizes than more recent studies. Additionally, there was a significant difference between the studies with respect to the change in emotional exhaustion (F(3, 230) = 4.86, p = .001, η2 = .06), such that participants in the first BREATHE study had a significantly larger reduction in emotional exhaustion than participants in the three subsequent studies. The present study was the first to examine potential predictors of response to the BREATHE intervention. Although the hypotheses were not supported, the implications of these findings are discussed and suggestions for future research directions are provided.