ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "intravenous administration"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Touching an Aseptic Injection Site Prior to Intravenous Administration: Can microorganisms be introduced to the aseptic area?
    (Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2014-04-11) Ruth, Tina L
    Touching an aseptic injection site to relocate a vein is a common practice when preparing for intravenous catheterization. The purpose of this research was to determine if touching an aseptic injection site prior to intravenous administration with the use of non-sterile gloves could introduce microorganisms. Methods Two different sampling techniques were evaluated. Technique 1 samples were taken from a technologist who donned a pair of non-sterile latex free gloves prior to preparing the materials used for injection and vein palpation. Technique 2 samples were taken from a technologist who donned a pair of non-sterile latex free gloves after preparing the materials used for injection and vein palpation. In both techniques, the injection site was made aseptic with an isopropyl alcohol prep pad. Asepsis was maintained by not touching the injection site to relocate the vein. The procedure was stopped just before the technologist would touch the aseptic site for vein relocation. The gloved tips of digits two, three, and four of the right and left hands were used to inoculate a blood agar petri dish. The petri dishes were incubated for 48 hours at 37° Celsius. A method blank (control) was collected for each sample set collected from Technique 1 and Technique 2. A total of twenty samples were collected, ten from each technique. Results The method blanks and samples both showed observable growth of microorganisms (potential for contamination). 14% (1 out of 7) of the method blanks showed growth. 80% (8 out of 10) of both the right and left hand samples using Technique 1 showed growth. 90% (9 out of 10) of the right hand samples of Technique 2 showed growth, and 60% (6 out of 10) of the left hand samples showed growth. Conclusion Microorganisms could be introduced to the aseptic injection site with commonly used injection techniques.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University