Browsing by Subject "catheter ablation"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary
    (Elsevier, 2019) Cronin, Edmond M.; Bogun, Frank M.; Maury, Philippe; Peichl, Petr; Chen, Minglong; Namboodiri, Narayanan; Aguinaga, Luis; Leite, Luiz Roberto; Al-Khatib, Sana M.; Anter, Elad; Berruezo, Antonio; Callans, David J.; Chung, Mina K.; Cuculich, Phillip; d’Avila, Andre; Deal, Barbara J.; Della Bella, Paolo; Deneke, Thomas; Dickfeld, Timm-Michael; Hadid, Claudio; Haqqani, Haris M.; Kay, G. Neal; Latchamsetty, Rakesh; Marchlinski, Francis; Miller, John M.; Nogami, Akihiko; Patel, Akash R.; Pathak, Rajeev Kumar; Saenz Morales, Luis C.; Santangeli, Pasquale; Sapp, John L., Jr.; Sarkozy, Andrea; Soejima, Kyoko; Stevenson, William G.; Tedrow, Usha B.; Tzou, Wendy S.; Varma, Niraj; Zeppenfeld, Katja; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Healthcare Utilization and Quality of Life Improvement after Ablation for Paroxysmal AF in Younger and Older Patients
    (Wiley, 2017-04) Biviano, Angelo B.; Hunter, Tina D.; Dandamudi, Gopi; Fishel, Robert S.; Gidney, Brett; Herweg, Bengt; Oza, Saumil R.; Patel, Anshul Mahendra; Wang, Huijian; Pollak, Scott J.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases significantly with age. Little is known about the effect of AF ablation on quality of life and healthcare utilization in the elderly. The objective of this study was to quantify the healthcare utilization and quality of life benefits of catheter ablation for AF, for patients ≥65 years compared to patients <65 years. Methods Two multicenter U.S. registry studies enrolled patients with paroxysmal AF. Baseline characteristics and acute outcomes were collected for 736 patients receiving catheter ablation with the Navistar® ThermoCool® SF Catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc., Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Healthcare utilization and quality of life outcomes were collected through 1 year postablation for 508 patients. Results The rates of acute pulmonary vein isolation were high and similar between patients ≥65 years and <65 years (97.5% vs 95.8%, P = 0.2130). Length of stay for the index procedure was similar between age groups with 82.2% of the older group and 83.2% of the younger group having one-day hospitalization. Disease-specific quality of life instrument scores improved significantly and similarly for older and younger patients at 1 year postablation, compared to baseline. AF-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits were similar or lower in older patients compared to younger patients, as reported at 1 year postablation. Conclusion For older patients undergoing catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF, healthcare utilization parameters were lower or not significantly different than for younger patients, and quality of life outcomes were similarly improved. These findings support the use of catheter ablation as a treatment option in older patients with paroxysmal AF.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Initial Independent Outcomes from Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Multicenter FIRM Registry
    (Wiley, 2014-09) Miller, John M.; Kowal, Robert C.; Swarup, Vijay; Daubert, James P.; Daoud, Emile G.; Day, John D.; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.; Hummel, John D.; Baykaner, Tina; Krummen, David E.; Narayan, Sanjiv M.; Reddy, Vivek Y.; Shivkumar, Kalyanam; Steinberg, Jonathan S.; Wheelan, Kevin R.; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    Introduction The success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) may be improved if stable AF sources identified by Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping (FIRM) are also eliminated. The long-term results of this approach are unclear outside the centers where FIRM was developed; thus, we assessed outcomes of FIRM-guided AF ablation in the first cases at 10 experienced centers. Methods We prospectively enrolled n = 78 consecutive patients (61 ± 10 years) undergoing FIRM guided ablation for persistent (n = 48), longstanding persistent (n = 7), or paroxysmal (n = 23) AF. AF recordings from both atria with a 64-pole basket catheter were analyzed using a novel mapping system (Rhythm View™; Topera Inc., CA, USA). Identified rotors/focal sources were ablated, followed by PVI. Results Each institution recruited a median of 6 patients, each of whom showed 2.3 ± 0.9 AF rotors/focal sources in diverse locations. 25.3% of all sources were right atrial (RA), and 50.0% of patients had ≥1 RA source. Ablation of all sources required a total of 16.6 ± 11.7 minutes, followed by PVI. On >1 year follow-up with a 3-month blanking period, 1 patient lost to follow-up (median time to 1st recurrence: 245 days, IQR 145–354), single-procedure freedom from AF was 87.5% (patients without prior ablation; 35/40) and 80.5% (all patients; 62/77) and similar for persistent and paroxysmal AF (P = 0.89). Conclusions Elimination of patient-specific AF rotors/focal sources produced freedom-from-AF of ≈80% at 1 year at centers new to FIRM. FIRM-guided ablation has a rapid learning curve, yielding similar results to original FIRM reports in each center’s first cases.