- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "agreement"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Agreement between Clinical Screening Procedures for Neuropathy in the Feet(2012-05) Wang, Yi; Goodrich, Jaclyn M.; Werner, Robert; Gillespie, Brenda; Basu, Niladri; Franzblau, AlfredINTRODUCTION: The correlation between monofilament testing, symptom surveys, and electrodiagnostic studies for the diagnosis of axonal polyneuropathy has not been well studied. This investigation was done to assess the agreement between these procedures in a non-random sample of volunteers. METHODS: The procedures evaluated included electrodiagnostic tests of the sural nerve, monofilament testing of the great toe, a symptom survey, and a body diagram. Kappa coefficients and sensitivity and specificity, using nerve conduction as a "gold standard," were used to determine the agreement between various combinations of procedures. RESULTS: Poor agreement (kappa values -0.12-0.44) and sensitivity (sensitivity <30%) were found for all combinations of symptoms and monofilament results in comparison with sural peak latency and amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results demonstrated a low discriminatory power for the screening procedures for identifying persons with impaired sural nerve function. The results highlight the need for further development and evaluation of screening methods for distal neuropathy in population-based studies.Item Emergency Physicians Are Able to Detect Right Ventricular Dilation With Good Agreement Compared to Cardiology(Wiley, 2017-07) Rutz, Matt A.; Clary, Julie M.; Kline, Jeffrey A.; Russell, Frances M.; Department of Emergency Medicine, IU School of MedicineObjective Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) is a useful tool in evaluating patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute dyspnea. Prior work has shown that right ventricular (RV) dilation is associated with repeat hospitalizations and shorter life expectancy. Traditionally, RV assessment has been evaluated by cardiologist-interpreted comprehensive echocardiography. The primary goal of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability between emergency physicians (EPs) and a cardiologist for determining RV dilation on FOCUS performed on ED patients with acute dyspnea. Methods This was a prospective, observational study at two urban academic EDs; patients were enrolled if they had acute dyspnea and a computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram without acute disease. All patients had an EP-performed FOCUS to assess for RV dilation. RV dilation was defined as an RV to left ventricular ratio greater than 1. FOCUS interpretations were compared to a blinded cardiologist FOCUS interpretation using agreement and kappa statistics. Results Of 84 FOCUS examinations performed on 83 patients, 17% had RV dilation. Agreement and kappa, for EP-performed FOCUS for RV dilation were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80–95%) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.48–0.88), respectively. Conclusions Emergency physician sonographers are able to detect RV dilation with good agreement when compared to cardiology. These results support the wider use of EP-performed FOCUS to evaluate for RV dilation in ED patients with dyspnea.Item Establishing the minimal sufficient number of measurements to validate a 24h blood pressure recording(2018-05-17) Agarwal, Rajiv; Tu, WanzhuBackground: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) remains a reference standard but the number of readings required to make the measurement valid has not been empirically validated. Methods: Among 360 patients with chronic kidney disease and 38 healthy controls, BP was recorded 2 per hour during the night and 3 per hour during the day over 24h using a validated ABPM device; all had at least 90% of the expected readings. From this full set of ABPM recording, a variable number of BP measurements were selected and we compared the performance of the selected readings against that of the full sample using random or sequential selection schemes. To address the question whether random or sequential selection schemes affect the diagnostic performance in diagnosing hypertension control we compared the diagnostic decisions reached with the subsample and the full sample using area under the receiver operating-characteristic curves (AUC ROC). To answer the question regarding the number of readings needed to achieve over 90% coverage of the mean BP of the full ABPM sample we ascertained the point and confidence interval (CI) estimates based on the selected data. Results: To diagnose hypertension control, the number of readings randomly drawn to establish lower bound with 2.5% error of area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (AUC ROC) of 0.9 was 3, 0.95 was 7, and 0.975 was 13 . In contrast, the corresponding number of readings with serial selections was 18, 30 and 39 respectively. With a random selection scheme, 18 readings provided 80% coverage of the 90th percentile of CI of the true systolic BP mean, for 90% coverage, 26 readings were needed, for 95% coverage 33. With serial selections, the number of readings increased to 42, 47, and 50 respectively. Similar results emerged for diastolic BP. Conclusions: For diagnosing hypertension control 3 random measurements or 18 serial measurements is sufficient. For quantitative analysis, the minimal sufficient number of 24h ambulatory BP is 26 random recordings or 42 serial recordings.Item Implications of Blood Pressure Measurement Technique for Implementation of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)(Highwire Press, 2017-02-03) Agarwal, Rajiv; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was reduced by 25% when blood pressure (BP) was targeted to 120 mm Hg systolic compared with 140 mm Hg systolic in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT); however, BP was measured using a research technique. SPRINT specified 5 minutes of seated rest in a quiet room followed by 3 oscillometric measurements without an observer in the room. The relationship of this research‐grade methodology to routine BP measurements is not known. Methods and Results Among 275 people with chronic kidney disease who had BP <140/90 mm Hg when they came to the clinic, we measured BP as in SPRINT and recorded BP on the same day without specification of seated rest. Compared with routine measurement, the research‐grade systolic BP was 12.7 mm Hg lower with wide limits of agreement (−46.1 to 20.7 mm Hg). Research grade systolic BP was 7.9 mm Hg lower than daytime ambulatory systolic BP and had wide agreement limits (−33.2 to 17.4 mm Hg). Whereas the routine, research‐grade, and daytime ambulatory systolic BP were all related to echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, the strength of the relationship between research‐grade and daytime ambulatory systolic BP to left ventricular hypertrophy was similar and stronger than the strength of the relationship between routine systolic BP and left ventricular hypertrophy. Conclusions Taken together, these results suggest that translation of the SPRINT results will require measurement of BP as performed in that trial. Instead of an algebraic manipulation of routine clinic measurements, the SPRINT methodology of BP measurement would be needed at minimum if implementation of the SPRINT results were to be deployed in the population at large.