Browsing by Subject "adaptive design"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Bayesian adaptive marker‐stratified design for molecularly targeted agents with customized hierarchical modeling
    (Wiley, 2019-07) Zang, Yong; Guo, Beibei; Han, Yan; Cao, Sha; Zhang, Chi; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    It is well known that the treatment effect of a molecularly targeted agent (MTA) may vary dramatically, depending on each patient's biomarker profile. Therefore, for a clinical trial evaluating MTA, it is more reasonable to evaluate its treatment effect within different marker subgroups rather than evaluating the average treatment effect for the overall population. The marker‐stratified design (MSD) provides a useful tool to evaluate the subgroup treatment effects of MTAs. Under the Bayesian framework, the beta‐binomial model is conventionally used under the MSD to estimate the response rate and test the hypothesis. However, this conventional model ignores the fact that the biomarker used in the MSD is, in general, predictive only for the MTA. The response rates for the standard treatment can be approximately consistent across different subgroups stratified by the biomarker. In this paper, we proposed a Bayesian hierarchical model incorporating this biomarker information into consideration. The proposed model uses a hierarchical prior to borrow strength across different subgroups of patients receiving the standard treatment and, therefore, improve the efficiency of the design. Prior informativeness is determined by solving a “customized” equation reflecting the physician's professional opinion. We developed a Bayesian adaptive design based on the proposed hierarchical model to guide the treatment allocation and test the subgroup treatment effect as well as the predictive marker effect. Simulation studies and a real trial application demonstrate that the proposed design yields desirable operating characteristics and outperforms the existing designs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Bayesian Adaptive Phase I/II Clinical Trial Design with Late-onset Competing Risk Outcomes
    (Wiley, 2021-09) Zhang, Yifei; Cao, Sha; Zhang, Chi; Jin, Ick Hoon; Zang, Yong; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    Early-phase dose-finding clinical trials are often subject to the issue of late-onset outcomes. In phase I/II clinical trials, the issue becomes more intractable because toxicity and efficacy can be competing risk outcomes such that the occurrence of the first outcome will terminate the other one. In this paper, we propose a novel Bayesian adaptive phase I/II clinical trial design to address the issue of late-onset competing risk outcomes. We use the continuation-ratio model to characterize the trinomial response outcomes and the cause-specific hazard rate method to model the competing-risk survival outcomes. We treat the late-onset outcomes as missing data and develop a Bayesian data augmentation method to impute the missing data from the observations. We also propose an adaptive dose-finding algorithm to allocate patients and identify the optimal biological dose during the trial. Simulation studies show that the proposed design yields desirable operating characteristics.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    SCI: A Bayesian adaptive phase I/II dose-finding design accounting for semi-competing risks outcomes for immunotherapy trials
    (Wiley, 2022-09) Zhang, Yifei; Guo, Beibei; Cao, Sha; Zhang, Chi; Zang, Yong; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    An immunotherapy trial often uses the phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose, which monitors the efficacy and toxicity outcomes simultaneously in a single trial. The progression-free survival rate is often used as the efficacy outcome in phase I/II immunotherapy trials. As a result, patients developing disease progression in phase I/II immunotherapy trials are generally seriously ill and are often treated off the trial for ethical consideration. Consequently, the happening of disease progression will terminate the toxicity event but not vice versa, so the issue of the semi-competing risks arises. Moreover, this issue can become more intractable with the late-onset outcomes, which happens when a relatively long follow-up time is required to ascertain progression-free survival. This paper proposes a novel Bayesian adaptive phase I/II design accounting for semi-competing risks outcomes for immunotherapy trials, referred to as the dose-finding design accounting for semi-competing risks outcomes for immunotherapy trials (SCI) design. To tackle the issue of the semi-competing risks in the presence of late-onset outcomes, we re-construct the likelihood function based on each patient's actual follow-up time and develop a data augmentation method to efficiently draw posterior samples from a series of Beta-binomial distributions. We propose a concise curve-free dose-finding algorithm to adaptively identify the optimal biological dose using accumulated data without making any parametric dose-response assumptions. Numerical studies show that the proposed SCI design yields good operating characteristics in dose selection, patient allocation, and trial duration.