Browsing by Subject "Ultrasonic propulsion"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    First-in-human clinical trial of ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones
    (First in Human Clinical Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones, 2016-04) Harper, Jonathan D.; Cunitz, Bryan W.; Dunmire, Barbrina; Lee, Franklin C.; Sorensen, Mathew D.; Hsi, Ryan S.; Thiel, Jeff; Wessells, Hunter; Lingeman, James E.; Bailey, Michael R.; Urology, School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: Ultrasonic propulsion is a new technology using focused ultrasound energy applied transcutaneously to reposition kidney stones. We report what are to our knowledge the findings from the first human investigational trial of ultrasonic propulsion toward the applications of expelling small stones and dislodging large obstructing stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects underwent ultrasonic propulsion while awake without sedation in clinic, or during ureteroscopy while anesthetized. Ultrasound and a pain questionnaire were completed before, during and after propulsion. The primary outcome was to reposition stones in the collecting system. Secondary outcomes included safety, controllable movement of stones and movement of stones less than 5 mm and 5 mm or greater. Adverse events were assessed weekly for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Kidney stones were repositioned in 14 of 15 subjects. Of the 43 targets 28 (65%) showed some level of movement while 13 (30%) were displaced greater than 3 mm to a new location. Discomfort during the procedure was rare, mild, brief and self-limited. Stones were moved in a controlled direction with more than 30 fragments passed by 4 of the 6 subjects who had previously undergone a lithotripsy procedure. The largest stone moved was 10 mm. One patient experienced pain relief during treatment of a large stone at the ureteropelvic junction. In 4 subjects a seemingly large stone was determined to be a cluster of small passable stones after they were moved. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic propulsion was able to successfully reposition stones and facilitate the passage of fragments in humans. No adverse events were associated with the investigational procedure.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Focused Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones
    (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2013-12-09) Sorensen, Mathew D.; Bailey, Michael R.; Hsi, Ryan S.; Cunitz, Bryan W.; Simon, Julianna; Wang, Yak-Nam; Dunmire, Barbrina L.; Paun, Marla; Starr, Frank; Lu, Wei; Evan, Andrew P.; Harper, Jonathan D.; Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Our research group is studying a noninvasive transcutaneous ultrasound device to expel small kidney stones or residual post-treatment stone fragments from the kidney.1-3 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasonic propulsion in a live porcine model. Materials and Methods: In domestic female swine (50-60 kg), human stones (calcium oxalate monohydrate) and metalized glass beads (2-8 mm) were ureteroscopically implanted.4 Target stones and beads were placed in the lower half of the kidney and a reference bead was placed in the upper pole. Ultrasonic propulsion was achieved through a single ultrasound system that allowed targeting, stone propulsion, and ultrasound imaging using a Philips HDI C5-2 commercial imaging transducer and a Verasonics diagnostic ultrasound platform. Stone propulsion was achieved through the delivery of 1-second bursts of focused, ultrasound pulses, which consist of 250 finely focused pulses 0.1 milliseconds in duration. Stone propulsion was then observed using fluoroscopy, ultrasound, and visually with the ureteroscope. The kidneys were then perfusion-fixed with glutaraldehyde, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained. Samples were histologically scored for injury by a blinded independent expert. Using the same pulsing scheme, while varying acoustic intensities, an injury threshold and patterns of injury were determined in additional pigs.5,6 Results: Stones were successfully implanted in 14 kidneys. Overall, 17 of 26 (65)% stones/beads were moved the entire distance to the renal pelvis, ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), or proximal ureter. The average procedure time for successfully repositioned stones was 14.2±7.9 minutes with 23±16 push bursts. No gross or histologic damage was identified from the ultrasound propulsion procedure. Under this pulsing scheme, a maximum exposure of 2400 W/cm2 was delivered during each treatment. An intensity threshold of 16,620 W/cm2 was determined at which, above this level, tissue injury consistent with emulsification, necrosis, and hemorrhage appeared to be dose dependent. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion is effective with most stones being relocated to the renal pelvis, UPJ, or proximal ureter in a timely fashion. The procedure appears safe with no evidence of injury. The acoustic intensities delivered at maximum treatment settings are well below the threshold at which injury is observed. The angle and alignment of directional force are the most critical factors determining the efficacy of stone propulsion. We are now pursuing FDA approval for a human feasibility study. No competing financial interests exist. Runtime of video: 5 mins 44 secs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Focused ultrasound to displace renal calculi: threshold for tissue injury
    (Springer Nature, 2014-03-31) Wang, Yak-Nam; Simon, Julianna C.; Cunitz, Bryan W.; Starr, Frank L.; Paun, Marla; Liggitt, Denny H.; Evan, Andrew P.; McAteer, James A.; Liu, Ziyue; Dunmire, Barbrina; Bailey, Michael R.; Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine
    Background: The global prevalence and incidence of renal calculi is reported to be increasing. Of the patients that undergo surgical intervention, nearly half experience symptomatic complications associated with stone fragments that are not passed and require follow-up surgical intervention. In a clinical simulation using a clinical prototype, ultrasonic propulsion was proven effective at repositioning kidney stones in pigs. The use of ultrasound to reposition smaller stones or stone fragments to a location that facilitates spontaneous clearance could therefore improve stone-free rates. The goal of this study was to determine an injury threshold under which stones could be safely repositioned. Methods: Kidneys of 28 domestic swine were treated with exposures that ranged in duty cycle from 0%-100% and spatial peak pulse average intensities up to 30 kW/cm(2) for a total duration of 10 min. The kidneys were processed for morphological analysis and evaluated for injury by experts blinded to the exposure conditions. Results: At a duty cycle of 3.3%, a spatial peak intensity threshold of 16,620 W/cm(2) was needed before a statistically significant portion of the samples showed injury. This is nearly seven times the 2,400-W/cm(2) maximum output of the clinical prototype used to move the stones effectively in pigs. Conclusions: The data obtained from this study show that exposure of kidneys to ultrasonic propulsion for displacing renal calculi is well below the threshold for tissue injury.