Browsing by Subject "Turnaround time"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Improving Turnaround Time of Molecular Diagnosis of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in a Hospital in Saudi Arabia
    (Oxford University Press, 2021-09-03) Rabaan, Ali A.; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: There have been 2562 laboratory-confirmed cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 27 countries, with a case fatality rate of 34.5%. Data on the turnaround time (TAT) are lacking. We report TAT for MERS-CoV samples over time. Methods: This is a monocentric study and the TAT for the reporting of 2664 MERS-CoV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results were calculated in hours from the time of the receipt of respiratory samples to the reporting of the results. Results: The mean TAT±standard deviation was significantly lower in 2018 compared with previous years (19.25±13.8). The percentage of samples processed within 24 h increased from 42.3% to 73.8% in 2015 and 2018, respectively (p<0.0001). The mean TAT was 19.2 h in 2018 and was significantly lower than previous years. Conclusions: The TAT for the MERS-CoV results decreased during the study period. Timely reporting of MERS-CoV PCR results may aid in further enhancing infection control measures.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Radiologists Help Each Other to Improve Efficiency by Decreasing the Time to Look Up a Patient’s Relevant Clinical History in the Electronic Medical Record
    (Springer, 2023) Shafique, Umber; Hillis, Stephen L.; Park, Jinha M.; Kuehn, David M.; Rajput, Maheen; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    The study aims to prove that it takes less time to look up relevant clinical history from an electronic medical record (EMR) if the information is already provided in a specific space in the EMR by a fellow radiologist. Patients with complex oncological and surgical histories need frequent imaging, and every time a radiologist may spend a significant amount of time looking up the same clinical information as their peers. In collaboration with ACMIO and Radiant Epic team, a space labeled "Specialty Comments" was added to the SNAPSHOT of patient's chart in EMR. For our research purpose, the specialty comment was labeled as boxed history as a variable for data analysis. If the history was not provided in that particular space, it was labeled as without boxed history. Inclusion criteria included outpatients with complex oncological histories undergoing CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis with IV contrast. The time to look up history (LUT) was documented in minutes and seconds. Two assistant professors from Abdominal Imaging provided LUT. A total of 85 cases were included in the study, 39 with boxed history and 46 without boxed history. Comparing averages of the individual reader means for history, mean LUT differed by 2.03 min (without boxed history) versus 0.57 min (with boxed history), p < 0.0001. The t-test and the nonparametric Wilcoxon tests for a difference in the population means were highly significant (p < 0.0001). A history directed to radiologist's needs resulted in a statistically significant decrease in time spent by interpreting radiologists to look through the electronic medical records for patients with complex oncological histories. Availability of history pertinent to radiology has wide-ranging advantages, including quality reporting, decrease in turnaround time, reduction in interpretation errors, and radiologists' continued learning. The space for documenting clinical history may be reproduced, or some similar area may be developed by optimizing the electronic medical records.