- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Terminal care"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 28
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Achieving balance in federal and state pain policy: a guide to evaluation (Evaluation guide 2006). [Part 1](2006-09) University of Wisconsin. School of Medicine and Public Health. Pain & Policy Studies Group.Assesses federal and state policies regarding the use of controlled substances for pain management, palliative care and end-of-life care. Part 1 contains Sections I - VII of the report, and the federal profile of Section VIII. Part 2 contains state profiles for Alabama - Illinois. Part 3 contains state profiles for Indiana - Michigan. Part 4 contains state profiles for Minnesota - South Dakota. Part 5 contains state profiles for Tennessee - Wyoming, Section IX and the appendices.Item Achieving balance in federal and state pain policy: a guide to evaluation (Evaluation guide 2006). [Part 2](2006-09) University of Wisconsin. School of Medicine and Public Health. Pain & Policy Studies Group.Assesses federal and state policies regarding the use of controlled substances for pain management, palliative care and end-of-life care. Part 1 contains Sections I - VII of the report, and the federal profile of Section VIII. Part 2 contains state profiles for Alabama - Illinois. Part 3 contains state profiles for Indiana - Michigan. Part 4 contains state profiles for Minnesota - South Dakota. Part 5 contains state profiles for Tennessee - Wyoming, Section IX and the appendices.Item Achieving balance in federal and state pain policy: a guide to evaluation (Evaluation guide 2006). [Part 3](2006-09) University of Wisconsin. School of Medicine and Public Health. Pain & Policy Studies Group.Assesses federal and state policies regarding the use of controlled substances for pain management, palliative care and end-of-life care. Part 1 contains Sections I - VII of the report, and the federal profile of Section VIII. Part 2 contains state profiles for Alabama - Illinois. Part 3 contains state profiles for Indiana - Michigan. Part 4 contains state profiles for Minnesota - South Dakota. Part 5 contains state profiles for Tennessee - Wyoming, Section IX and the appendices.Item Achieving balance in federal and state pain policy: a guide to evaluation (Evaluation guide 2006). [Part 4](2006-09) University of Wisconsin. School of Medicine and Public Health. Pain & Policy Studies Group.Assesses federal and state policies regarding the use of controlled substances for pain management, palliative care and end-of-life care. Part 1 contains Sections I - VII of the report, and the federal profile of Section VIII. Part 2 contains state profiles for Alabama - Illinois. Part 3 contains state profiles for Indiana - Michigan. Part 4 contains state profiles for Minnesota - South Dakota. Part 5 contains state profiles for Tennessee - Wyoming, Section IX and the appendices.Item Achieving balance in federal and state pain policy: a guide to evaluation (Evaluation guide 2006). [Part 5](2006-09) University of Wisconsin. School of Medicine and Public Health. Pain & Policy Studies Group.Assesses federal and state policies regarding the use of controlled substances for pain management, palliative care and end-of-life care. Part 1 contains Sections I - VII of the report, and the federal profile of Section VIII. Part 2 contains state profiles for Alabama - Illinois. Part 3 contains state profiles for Indiana - Michigan. Part 4 contains state profiles for Minnesota - South Dakota. Part 5 contains state profiles for Tennessee - Wyoming, Section IX and the appendices.Item Continuity of care and receipt of aggressive end of life care among women dying of ovarian cancer(Elsevier, 2021) Mullins, Megan A.; Ruterbusch, Julie J.; Clarke, Philippa; Uppal, Shitanshu; Cote, Michele L.; Wallner, Lauren P.; Medicine, School of MedicineObjective: To evaluate the association between post-diagnosis continuity of care and receipt of aggressive end of life care among women dying of ovarian cancer. Methods: This retrospective claims analysis included 6680 Medicare beneficiaries over age 66 with ovarian cancer who survived at least one year after diagnosis, had at least 4 outpatient evaluation and management visits and died between 2000 and 2016. We calculated the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index (COC) for each woman, and split COC into tertiles (high, medium, low). We compared late or no hospice use, >1 emergency department (ED) visit, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, >1 hospitalization, terminal hospitalization, chemotherapy, and invasive and/or life extending procedures among women with high or medium vs. low COC using multivariable adjusted logistic regression. Results: In this sample, 49.8% of women received aggressive care in the last month of life. Compared to women with low COC, women with high COC had 66% higher odds of chemotherapy (adjusted OR 1.66 CI 1.23-2.24) in the last two weeks of life. Women with high COC also had 16% greater odds of not enrolling in hospice compared to women with low COC (adjusted OR 1.16 CI 1.01-1.33). COC was not associated with late enrollment in hospice, hospital utilization, or aggressive procedures. Conclusions: COC at the end of life is complicated and may pose unique challenges in providing quality end of life care. Future work exploring the specific facets of continuity associated with quality end of life care is needed.Item End-of-life care and outcomes. [Part 1](Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004-12) Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RANDEvaluates the effectiveness of end-of-life care. Part 1 contains the front matter, Summary, and Chapters 1-2. Part 2 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters A-C). Part 3 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters D-H). Part 4 contains Chapter 4 and References. Part 5 contains Appendix A, B, C, D. Part 6 contains Appendix E1-E3. Part 7 contains Appendix E4-E5. Part 8 contains Appendix F, G, H. Parts 9-12 contain Appendix I. Part 13 contains Appendix J and K. Part 14 contains Appendix L. Parts 15-16 contain Appendix M.Item End-of-life care and outcomes. [Part 2](Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004-12) Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RANDEvaluates the effectiveness of end-of-life care. Part 1 contains the front matter, Summary, and Chapters 1-2. Part 2 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters A-C). Part 3 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters D-H). Part 4 contains Chapter 4 and References. Part 5 contains Appendix A, B, C, D. Part 6 contains Appendix E1-E3. Part 7 contains Appendix E4-E5. Part 8 contains Appendix F, G, H. Parts 9-12 contain Appendix I. Part 13 contains Appendix J and K. Part 14 contains Appendix L. Parts 15-16 contain Appendix M.Item End-of-life care and outcomes. [Part 3](Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004-12) Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RANDEvaluates the effectiveness of end-of-life care. Part 1 contains the front matter, Summary, and Chapters 1-2. Part 2 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters A-C). Part 3 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters D-H). Part 4 contains Chapter 4 and References. Part 5 contains Appendix A, B, C, D. Part 6 contains Appendix E1-E3. Part 7 contains Appendix E4-E5. Part 8 contains Appendix F, G, H. Parts 9-12 contain Appendix I. Part 13 contains Appendix J and K. Part 14 contains Appendix L. Parts 15-16 contain Appendix M.Item End-of-life care and outcomes. [Part 4](Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004-12) Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RANDEvaluates the effectiveness of end-of-life care. Part 1 contains the front matter, Summary, and Chapters 1-2. Part 2 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters A-C). Part 3 contains Chapter 3 (sub-chapters D-H). Part 4 contains Chapter 4 and References. Part 5 contains Appendix A, B, C, D. Part 6 contains Appendix E1-E3. Part 7 contains Appendix E4-E5. Part 8 contains Appendix F, G, H. Parts 9-12 contain Appendix I. Part 13 contains Appendix J and K. Part 14 contains Appendix L. Parts 15-16 contain Appendix M.
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »