Browsing by Subject "Systemic therapy"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cognitive impairment in older patients with breast cancer before systemic therapy: is there an interaction between cancer and comorbidity?
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014-06-20) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Stern, Robert A.; Luta, Gheorghe; McGuckin, Meghan; Clapp, Jonathan D.; Hurria, Arti; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Faul, Leigh Anne; Isaacs, Claudine; Denduluri, Neelima; Gavett, Brandon; Traina, Tiffany A.; Johnson, Patricia; Silliman, Rebecca A.; Turner, R. Scott; Howard, Darlene; Van Meter, John W.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Ahles, Tim; Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine
    PURPOSE: To determine if older patients with breast cancer have cognitive impairment before systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer and matched friend or community controls age > 60 years without prior systemic treatment, dementia, or neurologic disease. Participants completed surveys and a 55-minute battery of 17 neuropsychological tests. Biospecimens were obtained for APOE genotyping, and clinical data were abstracted. Neuropsychological test scores were standardized using control means and standard deviations (SDs) and grouped into five domain z scores. Cognitive impairment was defined as any domain z score two SDs below or ≥ two z scores 1.5 SDs below the control mean. Multivariable analyses evaluated pretreatment differences considering age, race, education, and site; comparisons between patient cases also controlled for surgery. RESULTS: The 164 patient cases and 182 controls had similar neuropsychological domain scores. However, among patient cases, those with stage II to III cancers had lower executive function compared with those with stage 0 to I disease, after adjustment (P = .05). The odds of impairment were significantly higher among older, nonwhite, less educated women and those with greater comorbidity, after adjustment. Patient case or control status, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and surgery were not associated with impairment. However, there was an interaction between comorbidity and patient case or control status; comorbidity was strongly associated with impairment among patient cases (adjusted odds ratio, 8.77; 95% CI, 2.06 to 37.4; P = .003) but not among controls (P = .97). Only diabetes and cardiovascular disease were associated with impairment among patient cases. CONCLUSION: There were no overall differences between patients with breast cancer and controls before systemic treatment, but there may be pretreatment cognitive impairment within subgroups of patient cases with greater tumor or comorbidity burden.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    LyP-1-Modified Oncolytic Adenoviruses Targeting Transforming Growth Factor β Inhibit Tumor Growth and Metastases and Augment Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Breast Cancer Mouse Models
    (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2020-08) Xu, Weidong; Yang, Yuefeng; Hu, Zebin; Head, Maria; Mangold, Kathy A.; Sullivan, Megan; Wang, Edward; Saha, Poornima; Gulukota, Kamalakar; Helseth, Donald L., Jr.; Guise, Theresa; Prabhkar, Bellur S.; Kaul, Karen; Schreiber, Hans; Seth, Prem; Medicine, School of Medicine
    We report here the development of oncolytic adenoviruses (Ads) that have reduced toxicity, enhanced tumor tropism, produce strong antitumor response, and can overcome resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in breast cancer. We have shown that LyP-1 receptor (p32) is highly expressed on the surface of breast cancer cells and tumors from cancer patients, and that increased stromal expression of transforming growth factor β-1 (TGFβ-1) is associated with triple-negative breast cancer. Therefore, we constructed oncolytic Ads, AdLyp.sT and mHAdLyp.sT, in which the p32-binding LyP-1 peptide was genetically inserted into the adenoviral fiber protein. Both AdLyp.sT and mHAdLyp.sT express sTGFβRIIFc, a TGFβ decoy that can inhibit TGFβ pathways. mHAdLyp.sT is an Ad5/48 chimeric hexon virus in which hypervariable regions (HVRs 1–7) of Ad5 are replaced with the corresponding Ad48 HVRs. AdLyp.sT and mHAdLyp.sT exhibited better binding, replication, and produced higher sTGFβRIIFc protein levels in breast cancer cell lines compared with Ad.sT or mHAd.sT control viruses without LyP-1 peptide modification. Systemic delivery of mHAdLyp.sT in mice resulted in reduced hepatic/systemic toxicity compared with Ad.sT and AdLyp.sT. Intravenous delivery of AdLyp.sT and mHAdLyp.sT elicited a strong antitumor response in a human MDA-MB-231 bone metastasis model in mice, as indicated by bioluminescence imaging, radiographic tumor burden, serum TRACP 5b and calcium, and body weight analyses. Furthermore, intratumoral delivery of AdLyp.sT in 4T1 model in immunocompetent mice inhibited tumor growth and metastases, and augmented anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Based on these studies, we believe that AdLyp.sT and mHAdLyp.sT can be developed as potential targeted immunotherapy agents for the treatment of breast cancer.