Browsing by Subject "Single ventricle"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Metabolic profiles identify circulating biomarkers associated with heart failure in young single ventricle patients
    (Springer, 2021-10-03) O’Connell, Thomas M.; Logsdon, David L.; Mitscher, Gloria; Payne, R. Mark; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Children and young adults with single ventricle (SV) heart disease frequently develop heart failure (HF) that is intractable and difficult to treat. Our understanding of the molecular and biochemical reasons underlying this is imperfect. Thus, there is an urgent need for biomarkers that predict outcome and provide a rational basis for treatment, and advance our understanding of the basis of HF. Objective: We sought to determine if a metabolomic approach would provide biochemical signatures of HF in SV children and young adults. If significant, these analytes might serve as biomarkers to predict outcome and inform on the biological mechanism(s) of HF. Methods: We applied a multi-platform metabolomics approach composed of mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) which yielded 495 and 26 metabolite measurements respectively. The plasma samples came from a cross-sectional set of young SV subjects, ages 2-19 years with ten control (Con) subjects and 16 SV subjects. Of the SV subjects, nine were diagnosed as congestive HF (SVHF), and 7 were not in HF. Metabolomic data were correlated with clinical status to determine if there was a signature associated with HF. Results: There were no differences in age, height, weight or sex between the 3 cohorts. However, statistical analysis of the metabolomic profiles using ANOVA revealed 44 metabolites with significant differences between cohorts including 41 profiled by MS and 3 by NMR. These metabolites included acylcarnitines, amino acids, and bile acids, which distinguished Con from all SV subjects. Furthermore, metabolite profiles could distinguish between SV and SVHF subjects. Conclusion: These are the first data to demonstrate a clear metabolomic signature associated with HF in children and young adults with SV. Larger studies are warranted to determine if these findings are predictive of progression to HF in time to provide intervention.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Effect of Udenafil on Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Adolescents With the Fontan Circulation
    (Elsevier, 2024) Edelson, Jonathan B.; Zak, Victor; Goldberg, David; Fleming, Greg; Mackie, Andrew S.; Patel, Jyoti K.; Files, Matthew; Downing, Tacy; Richmond, Marc; Acheampong, Ben; Cartoski, Mark; Detterich, Jon; McCrindle, Brian; McHugh, Kimberly; Hansen, Jesse E.; Wagner, Jonathan; Di Maria, Michael; Weingarten, Angela; Nowlen, Todd; Yoon, Ja Kyoung; Kim, Gi Beom; Williams, Richard; Whitehill, Robert; Kirkpatrick, Edward; Yin, Suellen; Ermis, Peter; Lubert, Adam M.; Stylianou, Mario; Freemon, D'Andrea; Hu, Chenwei; Garuba, Olukayode D.; Frommelt, Peter; Goldstein, Bryan H.; Paridon, Stephen; Garg, Ruchira; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    The Fontan Udenafil Exercise Longitudinal (FUEL) trial showed that treatment with udenafil was associated with improved exercise performance at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold in children with Fontan physiology. However, it is not known how the initiation of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy affects heart rate and blood pressure in this population. These data may help inform patient selection and monitoring after the initiation of udenafil therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of udenafil on vital signs in the cohort of patients enrolled in the FUEL trial. This international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of udenafil included adolescents with single ventricle congenital heart disease who had undergone Fontan palliation. Changes in vital signs (heart rate [HR], systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) were compared both to subject baseline and between the treatment and the placebo groups. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to evaluate changes in vital signs for prespecified subpopulations believed to be most sensitive to udenafil initiation. Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment and placebo cohorts (n = 200 for each). The groups demonstrated a decrease in HR, SBP, and DBP 2 hours after drug/placebo administration, except SBP in the placebo group. There was an increase in SBP from baseline to after 6-min walk test in the treatment and placebo groups, and the treatment group showed an increase in HR (87.4 ± 15.0 to 93.1 ± 19.4 beats/min, p <0.01) after exercise. When comparing changes from baseline to the 26-week study visit, small decreases in both SBP (-1.9 ± 12.3 mm Hg, p = 0.03) and DBP (-3.0 ± 9.6 mm Hg, p <0.01) were seen in the treatment group. There were no clinically significant differences between treatment and placebo group in change in HR or blood pressure in the youngest age quartile, lightest weight quartile, or those on afterload-reducing agents. In conclusion, initiation of treatment with udenafil in patients with Fontan circulation was not associated with clinically significant changes in vital signs, implying that for patients similar to those enrolled in the FUEL trial, udenafil can be started without the requirement for additional monitoring after initial administration.