- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Silver diamine fluoride"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Dentin tubule occlusion by a 38% silver diamine fluoride gel: an in vitro investigation(Springer Nature, 2022) Kiesow, Andreas; Menzel, Matthias; Lippert, Frank; Tanzer, Jason M.; Milgrom, Peter; Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of DentistryObjective: Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is effective in treatment of dentin hypersensitivity and caries lesions. However, the non-viscous solution does not easily allow clinicians to control the application area. A 38% SDF experiment gel was compared in vitro to commercial SDF for its ability to penetrate and occlude dentinal tubules. Materials and methods: Human root surface dentin specimens were treated with gelled or standard 38% SDF or negative control. Penetration behavior was established by Drop Shape Analysis. Precipitates at the surface and within tubules were analyzed by SEM and EDX after treatment; Results: penetration depths up to 500 µm were observed for both SDF formulations. Both formulations occluded dentinal tubules similarly. Precipitates on the dentin surface and within dentinal tubules were found for both SDF formulations, with a slight tendency for the experimental gel SDF product to be more abundant than the commercially available one. Discussion: behavior of the experimental 38% SDF gel formulation appeared indistinguishable from the commercial 38% SDF product with respect to dentinal tubule penetration and occlusion. Conclusions: The experimental 38% SDF gel may be a suitable intervention for the prevention of dentin hypersensitivity.Item The Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Caries Lesion Remineralization as a Function of Lesion Baseline Mineral Distribution(2022) AlMady, Fahad; Lippert, Frank; Hara, Anderson; Al Dehailan, Laila; Capin, OrianaPurpose: The primary objective of this laboratory study was to investigate whether the ability of SDF to remineralize caries lesion is modulated by their baseline mineral distribution. The exploratory objective was to determine whether the staining caused by SDF is modulated by lesion mineral distribution. Materials and methods: This in vitro study utilized bovine permanent enamel specimens. SDF was compared to the clinical reference standard, 5% sodium fluoride varnish (FV), and deionized water (DIW) was the negative control. By utilizing three lesion creation protocols (methylcellulose [MeC], hydroxyethylcellulose [HEC], Carbopol [C907]), artificial caries lesions with different mineral distributions (n=20 per subgroup) were created in the enamel specimens Interventions were applied and the lesions remineralized using artificial saliva. Changes in mineral loss, lesion depth, mineral density of the surface zone, and lesion mineral distribution were determined using transverse microradiography. Throughout the study, color of the lesion and changes thereof were measured using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA. Pair-wise comparisons were performed using Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Differences to control the overall significance level at 5%. Results: For changes in mineral loss, DIW in MeC showed significantly greater change (more remineralization) than both SDF (p<0.01) and FV (p=0.01), which were not different from one another (p=0.13). There were no statistically significant differences between SDF and FV in the other lesions (C907 – p=0.18; HEC – p=0.56). For changes in lesion depth, there was no statistically significant interaction between study factors lesion protocol and treatments (p=0.23) as well as the individual factors lesion protocols (p=0.08) and treatments (p=0.82). For changes in surface zone mineral density, SDF showed significant change in mineral density compared to FV (p=0.02); however, SDF was not different from with DIW (p=0.25). For lesion mineral distribution, MeC exhibited the greater mineral loss in the lesion body and lowest mineral density at the surface zone. HEC lesions were the deepest but exhibited modest differences in mineral loss between the lesion body and the surface zone. C907 lesions were somewhat between MeC and HEC. SDF in MeC had the highest mineral gain in the surface zone, while DIW resulted in the highest mineral gain in the lesion body. SDF in HEC showed the highest mineral gain in the surface area compared to FV and DIW, with all treatments resulting in the largest mineral gain to a similar extent in the lesion body. In C907, SDF showed the most mineral gain in the lesion body compared to DIW and FV, while differences in the surface zone between treatments were less pronounced. For color changes post intervention, SDF showed more darkening in C907 and HEC lesions compared to MeC (p<0.01) and compared to FV and DIW. For post remineralization, SDF treated C907 lesions became significantly whiter (p<0.01) compared to SDF in MeC and HEC which continued to get darker. Conclusion: SDF did exhibit different remineralization abilities and behaviors and the modulation was based on lesion baseline mineral distribution. Staining resulting from SDF treatment varied significantly based on lesion mineral distribution.Item Effects of silver diamine fluoride on demineralization protection after a secondary acid challenge(University of Sao Paulo, 2023-11-03) Tudares, Mauro A.; Eckert, George J.; Lippert, Frank; Biomedical and Applied Sciences, School of DentistryObjective: This investigation describes the effects of 5% sodium fluoride varnish and 38% silver diamine fluoride on demineralization protection of human enamel lesions of three different severities after a secondary acid challenge. Study design: Specimens underwent color and enamel surface microhardness change measurements after demineralization and treatment events. Transverse microradiography was conducted following the secondary demineralization. Results: After treatments, enamel surface microhardness change showed that 24-hour lesions treated with fluoride varnish had less rehardening than 24-hour lesions treated with silver diamine fluoride (p<0.05), whereas 144-hour lesions from both treatment groups showed a beneficial decrease in surface microhardness change that was markedly better in samples treated with silver diamine fluoride (p<0.05). After the secondary demineralization, 24- and 144-hour lesions treated with silver diamine fluoride showed a sustained beneficial decrease in enamel surface microhardness change when compared to fluoride varnish-treated samples of the corresponding lesion severity (p<0.05). Transverse microradiography showed no difference between fluoride varnish- and silver diamine fluoride-treated samples of any corresponding lesion severity, indicating that remineralization in both fluoride varnish- and silver diamine fluoride-treated samples was proportional to each other after a secondary acid challenge. Conclusions: Using silver diamine fluoride may have comparable benefits to fluoride varnish in mineral loss prevention.Item Longitudinal In Vitro Effects of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Early Enamel Caries Lesions(2020) Thompson Alcorn, Alice-Anne; Lippert, Frank; Al Dehailan, Laila; Cook, N. BlaineObjective: This study aimed to evaluate surface microhardness changes in early, incipient, non-cavitated white-spot, enamel caries lesions treated with silver diamine fluoride (SDF) longitudinally. The utilization of silver nitrate and potassium fluoride test groups served as additional controls to assist in evaluating if the remineralization effects were due to the silver or fluoride component in SDF. Hypotheses: 1. SDF treatment will result in increased surface microhardness of early, incipient, non-cavitated white-spot, enamel caries lesions compared to all other tested interventions. 2. Specimen storage for 2-weeks in artificial saliva will result in greater surface rehardening in lesions treated with SDF compared to other tested interventions. Design: This laboratory study had 5 intervention groups (SDF, silver nitrate (AgNO3), potassium fluoride (KF), 5.0-percent sodium fluoride varnish (FV), deionized water (DI)) × 2-time intervals after intervention (immediate & delayed pH-cycling), resulting in 10 groups (n = 18). Early, incipient, non-cavitated white-spot, enamel caries lesions were created in bovine enamel and extent of demineralization was determined using Vickers surface microhardness (VHNlesion). Intervention treatments were applied. Half the specimens from each group underwent immediate 5-day pH-cycling and half were stored in an incubator with artificial saliva for two weeks before undergoing 5-day pH-cycling. After pH-cycling, lesion hardness was evaluated using VHNpost. Specimens were then exposed to a second demineralization challenge and lesion softening was evaluated using VHNsecdem. Surface rehardening was calculated: ΔVHN =VHNpost - VHNlesion. Surface softening was calculated: ΔVHNsecdem =VHNsecdem – VHNpost. Data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Results: Immediately cycled, SDF had significantly (p < .0001) greater remineralization than DI, AgNO3, and FV. All delayed cycling groups had significantly (p < .0001) greater remineralization than FV. Significantly greater remineralization was noted in delayed AgNO3 (p < .0001), DI (p = .0003), and FV (p = .0006) compared to immediately cycled. After the second demineralization challenge, FV had significantly less surface softening than AgNO3 (p = 0.0002), DI (p = 0.0003), KF (p = 0.0225), and SDF (p = 0.0388) intervention groups. No significant difference was found between the pH-cycle timings. Conclusion: Based on our findings, FV maybe better suitable than SDF to treat early, incipient, non-cavitated white-spot, enamel caries lesions. Longitudinally, SDF exhibited greater remineralization than both FV and DI groups, though not statistically significant. However, upon a second demineralization challenge, FV significantly outperformed SDF in preventing surface softening.Item Silver Diamine Fluoride and Progression of Incipient Approximal Caries in Permanent Teeth: A Retrospective Study(American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 2021) Polacek, Jenna; Malhi, Nimrat; Yang, Yu-Ju; Scully, Allison C.; Soki, Fabiana N.; Boynton, James R.; Pediatric Dentistry, School of DentistryPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the progression of incipient approximal caries lesions in permanent teeth of children and adolescents with and without silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application. Methods: A retrospective analysis of dental records and radiographs was performed. Baseline and follow-up bitewing radiographs were evaluated and scored using International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) criteria to assess lesion progression. Results: A total of 131 lesions from 68 subjects (mean age equals 9.6 years) were evaluated radiographically and followed for up to 41 months (mean time equals 13.61±6.8 months); 23.6 percent of lesions in the SDF group progressed compared to 38.1 percent in the control group (P<0.001). On average, lesions in the control group increased more per month compared to the study group (P<0.001). The odds of lesion progression in the control group were 2.76 times the odds of progression in the study group. There was a statistically significant difference in lesion progression based on application method; lesions where SDF was applied with Superfloss progressed more per month, on average, versus microbrush application. Conclusions: Silver diamine fluoride may be an effective therapy to slow caries progression of incipient approximal lesions in permanent teeth in high caries-risk populations. Future studies are needed to detect differences in application methods.Item Utilization of Silver Diamine Fluoride by Dentists in the United States: A Dental Claims Review(American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 2020) Scully, Allison; Yepes, Juan F.; Tang, Qing; Downey, Timothy; Maupome, GerardoPurpose: A Current Dental Terminology (CDT) code, D1354, for silver diamine fluoride was made effective on January 1, 2016. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utilization of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) by pediatric dentists (PDs) and general dentists (GDs) in the United States. Methods: Data were obtained from a commercial dental insurance claims warehouse in the United States. Deidentified data for CDT code D1354 were collected from January 2016 to July 2019. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used. Results: A total of 321,726 D1354 claims were found. Data showed that SDF use measured by average monthly claims, unique number of dentists, and percent of paid claims increased each year. Patients zero to nine years old were the most likely to receive SDF treatment. SDF was significantly more likely to be placed on posterior teeth and in children zero to eight years old (P<0.001). PDs were more likely than GDs to submit claims for SDF in children (P<0.001). Conclusions: Silver diamine fluoride use is increasing, especially in patients age zero to nine years. Pediatric dentists are more likely to use SDF in children than general dentists. Posterior teeth receive the majority of SDF treatment.