Browsing by Subject "Selected Line"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Alcohol Preferring P Rats Exhibit Elevated Motor Impulsivity Concomitant with Operant Responding and Self-Administration of Alcohol
    (Wiley, 2016-05) Wesley Beckwith, Steven; Czachowski, Cristine Lynn; Psychology, School of Science
    BACKGROUND: Increased levels of impulsivity are associated with increased illicit drug use and alcoholism. Previous research in our laboratory has shown that increased levels of delay discounting (a decision-making form of impulsivity) are related to appetitive processes governing alcohol self-administration as opposed to purely consummatory processes. Specifically, the high-seeking/high-drinking alcohol-preferring P rats showed increased delay discounting compared to nonselected Long Evans rats (LE) whereas the high-drinking/moderate-seeking HAD2 rats did not. The P rats also displayed a perseverative pattern of behavior such that during operant alcohol self-administration they exhibited greater resistance to extinction. METHODS: One explanation for the previous findings is that P rats have a deficit in response inhibition. This study followed up on this possibility by utilizing a countermanding paradigm (stop signal reaction time [SSRT] task) followed by operant self-administration of alcohol across increasing fixed ratio requirements (FR; 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 responses). In separate animals, 24-hour access 2-bottle choice (10% EtOH vs. water) drinking was assessed. RESULTS: In the SSRT task, P rats exhibited an increased SSRT compared to both LE and HAD2 rats indicating a decrease in behavioral inhibition in the P rats. Also, P rats showed increased operant self-administration across all FRs and the greatest increase in responding with increasing FR requirements. Conversely, the HAD2 and LE had shorter SSRTs and lower levels of operant alcohol self-administration. However, for 2-bottle choice drinking HAD2s and P rats consumed more EtOH and had a greater preference for EtOH compared to LE. CONCLUSIONS: These data extend previous findings showing the P rats to have increased delay discounting (decision-making impulsivity) and suggest that P rats also have a lack of behavioral inhibition (motor impulsivity). This supports the notion that P rats are a highly impulsive as well as "high-seeking" model of alcoholism, and that the HAD2s' elevated levels of alcohol consumption are not mediated via appetitive processes or impulsivity.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ethanol pre-exposure does not increase delay discounting in P rats, but does impair the ability to dynamically adapt behavioral allocation to changing reinforcer contingencies
    (Elsevier, 2019-12) Beckwith, Steven Wesley; Czachowski, Cristine Lynn; Psychology, School of Science
    Increased subjective discounting of delayed rewards is associated with substance abuse, and individuals tend to discount their drug of choice at a greater rate compared to monetary rewards. While there is evidence indicating that increased delay discounting (DD) is a risk factor for substance abuse, some results suggest that exposure to drugs of abuse also increases DD, but effects are mixed. The current study examined whether ethanol pre-exposure increases DD and if an ethanol reinforcer would be discounted at a greater rate than sucrose. Alcohol preferring (P) rats were pre-exposed to either ethanol or sucrose using an intermittent access protocol (IAP) for 8 weeks. Then animals completed an operant fixed choice procedure where each pre-exposure group was split into either an ethanol or sucrose reinforcer group. Afterwards, animals completed an adjusting delay DD task using the same groups as the fixed choice task. Animals that received access to ethanol in the IAP showed increased delayed reward preference in a delay and session dependent manner. Specifically, ethanol pre-exposed animals took more sessions to decrease their preference for the delayed reward at longer delays. In the adjusting delay task, no differences in mean adjusting delays were seen, but ethanol pre-exposure impaired animals' ability to reach stability criteria. The observed results are not consistent with ethanol pre-exposure causing a change in DD. Rather they indicate ethanol pre-exposure impaired animals' ability to reallocate their behavior in response to a change in reinforcer contingencies. The current findings extend prior results showing alcohol naïve P rats exhibit both increased DD and decreased response inhibition (Beckwith and Czachowski 2014, 2016) by demonstrating that after alcohol exposure they exhibit a form of behavioral inflexibility. Hence, a "two-hit" genetic vulnerability/environmental acceleration of addictive behavior is supported.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Increased delay discounting tracks with a high ethanol-seeking phenotype and subsequent ethanol seeking but not consumption
    (Wiley Online Library, 2014-10) Beckwkith, Steven Wesley; Czachowski, Cristine Lynn; Department of Psychology, School of Science
    BACKGROUND: Increased levels of delay discounting have been associated with alcoholism and problematic levels of drinking. Attempts to assess the directionality of this relationship by studying individuals with a family history of alcoholism as well as rodent lines selectively bred for high home cage alcohol preference have yielded discordant results. One possible reason for this discordance is that increased levels of delay discounting may only track with specific processes that lead to addiction vulnerability. This study investigated this possibility by assessing 3 strains of rats previously identified to exhibit heritable differences in ethanol (EtOH) seeking and consumption. METHODS: In an adjusting amount delay discounting task, alcohol-preferring (P) rats who display high levels of both EtOH seeking and consumption were compared to high alcohol-drinking (HAD2) rats who only exhibit moderate EtOH seeking despite high levels of consumption, and Long Evans (LE) rats who display moderate seeking and consumption. EtOH-seeking and consumption phenotypes were subsequently confirmed in an operant self-administration task with a procedural separation between EtOH seeking and drinking. RESULTS: P rats discounted delayed rewards to a greater extent than both HAD2s and LE who did not show differences in discounting. Moreover, the EtOH-seeking and drinking phenotypes were replicated with P rats displaying greater EtOH seeking compared to both the HAD2s and LE, and both the HAD2s and P rats consuming more EtOH than LEs. CONCLUSIONS: Only the high-seeking strain, the P rats, exhibited increased levels of delay discounting. This suggests that this measure of behavioral under-control is specifically associated with alcohol-related appetitive, but not consummatory, processes as the moderate seeking/high drinking line did not show increased levels of impulsivity. This finding supports the hypothesis that delay discounting is specifically associated with only certain processes which are sufficient but not necessary to confer addiction vulnerability and therefore also supports increased levels of delay discounting as a predisposing risk factor for alcoholism.