Browsing by Subject "Roles checklist"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Clinical Applications of the Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance(2015-10) Bonsaksen, Tore; Scott, Patricia J.The three-part Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance (RC V2: QP) assesses role performance, role valuation, and current compared to past functioning. This session will illustrate by two different case examples how occupational therapists can make use of the RC V2: QP to support the clients’ process in diverse clinical settings: 1) In a psychiatric hospital setting with mental health clients, and 2) upon discharge from a medical setting to track recovery with transplant clients.Item Does the Role Checklist Measure Occupational Participation?(2015-07-01) Bonsaksen, Tore; Meidert, Ursula; Schuman, Deana; Kvarsnes, Hildegunn; Haglund, Lena; Prior, Susan; Forsyth, Kirsty; Yamada, Takashi; Scott, Patricia J.; Department of Occupational Therapy, IU School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesItem Establishing Cross-cultural Validity of the Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance(2014-06) Scott, Patricia J.; Bonsaksen, Tore; Forsyth, Kirsty; Haglund, Lena; Yamada, TakashiItem The Modified Role Checklist as a cross-culturally valid measure of participation?(2016-06) Meidert, Ursula; Scott, Patricia J.; Bonsaksen, Tore; Fenger, KristjanaPresented here is the work of the International Role Alliance for Participation. Its mission is to establish the Role-Checklist v2 (RCv2) as a cross-culturally valid measure of occupational participation consistent with the ICF. Included are 4 abstracts: feasibility of translation procedure; results from a survey examining role examples and their association with occupational participation; role examples for an ICF-linkage; and finally development of a scoring system.Item Use of the Role Checklist as a guide to measurement of narrative plots(2012-10) Scott, Patricia J.This presentation of the Role Checklist and it's utility on measuring change in participation outcomes features both a case presentation of how role checklist ratings preceded an adverse event post-transplant, as well as population level patterns of role return.Item Using the role checklist version 2: Quality of performance(2014) Aslaksen, Maya; Scott, Patricia J.; Haglund, Lena; Ellingham, Brian; Bonsaksen, ToreFor several decades, occupational therapy researchers have collected data about clients’ role performance with the Role Checklist, a widely used assessment tool, which collects self-reported information about clients’ roles. The Role Checklist includes two parts; Part 1 gathers data about role incumbency and Part 2 gathers data about role value. In 2008, Part 3 for the Role Checklist was developed to address occupational role performance, specifically prompting clients to rank the quality of their current role performance compared to their highest prior level. This reflects the client perspective of occupational participation corresponding to the performance capacity component of MOHO; thus establishing the Role Checklist Version Two: Quality of Performance (RC V2: QP). This paper illustrates by a case example how a therapist used the recently translated RC V2: QP in a psychiatric hospital setting in Norway in order to determine the extent to which the RC V2: QP supports the goal setting process as well as the therapist-client experience to verify subjective feasibility. It was reported that use of this instrument to guide the clinical interview was a positive experience for both the client and the therapist. The client had an opportunity to reflect upon his roles and how he would like to change them. The occupational therapist experienced that the interdisciplinary team working with this patient gradually developed a more comprehensive understanding of the patient’s challenges and resources. The RC V2: QP provided a basic set of information about the patient’s roles that was useful for setting treatment goals.