Browsing by Subject "Respiratory pathogens"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    582. Comparing Broad-range PCR Testing and The Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia (PN) Panel in the Diagnosis of Bacterial Pneumonia
    (Oxford University Press, 2023-11-27) Khan, Haseeba; Prabhudas-Strycker, Kirsten; Samaro, Matthew; Mellencamp, Kagan A.; Goings, Michael; Boyd, LaKeisha; Schneider, Jack; Emery, Christopher L.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Given the low sensitivity of conventional microbial isolation methods for identifying respiratory pathogens in bacterial pneumonia, target-specific syndromic multiplex real-time PCR panels have been used in conjunction with culture methods to improve diagnostic yield. Additionally, broad-range polymerase chain reaction (BR-PCR) targeting bacterial 16s rRNA conserved region has shown higher sensitivity with certain specimen types, so we sought to evaluate the clinical performance of BR-PCR performed on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens in comparison to The Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia (PN) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all BAL specimens that had both a PN panel test and BR-PCR performed from January 2020 to May 2022 at all Indiana University affiliated hospitals. The PN panel test was performed in-house as per laboratory protocol, while BR-PCR was performed in a reference laboratory. Outcomes assessed included turn-around times (TAT), sensitivity and specificity of BR-PCR and clinical impact, if any. Results: A total of 68 BAL specimens from 53 patients were identified (83% of patients were immunocompromised). Percent positivity for the PN panel was 19% and that of BR-PCR was 18%. With the PN panel used as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of BR-PCR was 85% and 98%, respectively. Only one respiratory organism was detected by BR-PCR but not by the PN panel, and it was not considered pathogenic or to have a significant clinical impact. The median TAT for the PN panel was 2.1 hours (1.8, 3.2) versus 7.8 days (6.9, 10.4) for BR-PCR. Conclusion: In our cohort of patients, BR-PCR testing was not superior to the Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia (PN) Panel when used to detect certain bacterial etiologies of pneumonia. Additionally, faster TAT for the panel test has the potential to enhance antimicrobial stewardship practices by enabling better antibiotic utilization. Adjunctive BR-PCR testing may be useful for clinical care when conventional testing is negative and patients are at risk for a variety of potential pathogens, including fungi.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Dynamic Patterns and Predominance of Respiratory Pathogens Post-COVID-19: Insights from a Two-Year Analysis
    (Springer, 2024) AlBahrani, Salma; AlZahrani, Samira Jamaan; Al-Maqati, Thekra N.; Almehbash, Atheer; Alshammari, Anfal; Bujlai, Refan; Ba Taweel, Sarah; Almasabi, Fares; AlAmari, Abdullah; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) stand out as the most frequent causes leading to visits to the emergency department and hospitalizations. This study aims to assess the types and prevalence of respiratory infections across two years following the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Patients presenting with an influenza-like illness (ILI) were tested using multiplex RT-PCR (QIAstat-Dx, Qiagen). The multiplexed RT- PCR test detects 21 respiratory viruses and bacteria. Results: During the study period, PCR test was done on a total of 1,790 samples were tested, and 712 (40%) were positive for a total of 796 pathogens. The mean age (± SD) of the participants was 20.1 ± 28.4 years in 2022 and 21.9 ± 27.6 years in 2023. Among the detected pathogens, the most prevalent were Rhinovirus/Enterovirus 222 (12.4%), followed by RSV A&B (103 cases, 5.7%), and H1N1 Influenza (77 cases, 4.3%). Additionally, Influenza A/B constituted 172 (9.6%) while parainfluenza constituted (58, 3.2%). SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 3.97% of the samples. Over the two-year period, the monthly pattern of the identified pathogens exhibited fluctuations in the prevalence. Furthermore, variations were observed in the detected pathogens across different age groups. Conclusion: In addition to adding significant knowledge to the field of respiratory viral infections, this study emphasizes the necessity of ongoing research and surveillance for the detection and characterization of respiratory viruses, particularly those with the potential for emergence. Such studies would also require setting up a strategy for genotyping and/or sequencing of viruses.