- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Resistance training"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Recruitment strategies and design considerations in a trial of resistance training to prevent dose-limiting toxicities in colon cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy(Elsevier, 2021) Caan, Bette J.; Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.; Brown, Justin C.; Campbell, Kristin L.; Cespedes Feliciano, Elizabeth M.; Lee, Catherine; Ross, Michelle C.; Quinney, Sara; Quesenberry, Charles; Sternfeld, Barbara; Schmitz, Kathryn H.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of MedicineLow muscle is associated with an increased risk of chemotherapy-related dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in cancer patients. Resistance training (RT) improves muscle mass; however, the effects of RT on preventing DLTs and dose reductions in colon cancer patients has not been investigated. FOcus on Reducing dose-limiting toxicities in Colon cancer with resistance Exercise (FORCE) is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial examining the effects of RT on relative dose intensity (RDI; primary outcome) and moderate and severe chemotoxicities (primary outcome) in non-metastatic colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients (N = 180) will be recruited from Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Penn State Cancer Institute. This paper describes recruitment strategies and design considerations. Patients will be randomized in equal numbers to RT intervention or control. Patients have baseline and post completion of chemotherapy visits where information on anthropometry, physical function, body composition, quality of life, physical activity and dietary behaviors, and inflammatory blood markers will be collected. Patient-reported outcomes of chemotherapy side effects will be collected around the time of chemotherapy throughout the duration of the trial. Intervention participants will be prescribed a progressive RT program consisting of 4-6 visits with a certified exercise trainer, delivered either in-person or remotely by video conference, and will be asked to engage twice weekly in-home training sessions. Control patients at the end of the study receive a consult with a FORCE exercise trainer, an online exercise RT training program and a set of resistance bands. Results of this trial will provide information on the benefit of resistance exercise as a treatment to increase RDI.Item Relative leg press strength relates to activity energy expenditure in older women: Implications for exercise prescription(Elsevier, 2022-11) Carter, Stephen J.; Singh, Harshvardan; Nabhan, Dustin C.; Long, Emily B.; Hunter, Gary R.; Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer CenterLimited work has evaluated how leg press strength (LPS), relative to body mass (i.e., rLPS), affects heart rate (HR) responses during activities of daily living. Such information would prove useful by informing a specific level of rLPS needed to promote independent mobility and physical activity. Secondary analyses were performed on baseline measures of 76 untrained older (65 ± 4 y) women. After familiarization, one-repetition maximum leg press was converted to rLPS by dividing the external load lifted (kg) by body mass (BM). Participants were stratified according to percentile of age-group norms of rLPS: ≤50 % (low, ≤0.99 kg/BM, n = 15), 51–89 % (middle, 1.0–1.31 kg/BM, n = 31), and ≥90 % (high, ≥1.32 kg/BM, n = 30). HR was measured at rest and during laboratory-based tasks including fixed-speed (0.89 m·s−1) non-graded treadmill walking, graded (2.5 %) treadmill walking, and stair stepping. Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) was measured via indirect calorimetry. Doubly labeled water was used to quantify activity energy expenditure (AEE) over a 14-d period. Relative LPS per group were: 0.85 ± 0.12 (low), 1.16 ± 0.09 (middle), and 1.55 ± 0.25 (high) (p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences in HR emerged during both walking tasks and stair stepping – with the high rLPS group having the lowest HR. AEE between-group comparisons did not yield statistical significance (p = 0.084), however, rLPS correlated with AEE (r = 0.234, p = 0.042) and V̇O2max (r = 0.430, p < 0.001). Such findings suggest a higher rLPS attenuates HR for weight-bearing activities while also demonstrating a significant, albeit modest, positive link to AEE among older women. This information may be especially relevant for informing thresholds of rLPS linked to mobility and functional independence in older women.