Browsing by Subject "Residency"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 13
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessing Resident Well-Being After the ABSITE: A Bad Time to Ask?
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022-09-28) Cheung, Elaine O.; Hu, Yue-Yung; Jones, Andrew; Ma, Meixi; Schlick, Cary Jo R.; Moskowitz, Judith T.; Agarwal, Gaurava; Bilimoria, Karl Y.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Objectives: Assess the association of residents' exam performance and transient emotions with their reports of burnout, suicidality, and mistreatment. Background: An annual survey evaluating surgical resident well-being is administered following the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). One concern about administering a survey after the ABSITE is that stress from the exam may influence their responses. Methods: A survey was administered to all general surgery residents following the 2018 ABSITE assessing positive and negative emotions (scales range from 0 to 12), as well as burnout, suicidality over the past 12 months, and mistreatment (discrimination, sexual harassment verbal/emotional or physical abuse) in the past academic year. Multivariable hierarchical regressions assessed the associations of exam performance and emotions with burnout, suicidality, and mistreatment. Results: Residents from 262 programs provided complete responses (N = 6987, 93.6% response rate). Residents reported high mean positive emotion (M = 7.54, SD = 2.35) and low mean negative emotion (M = 5.33, SD = 2.43). While residents in the bottom ABSITE score quartile reported lower positive and higher negative emotion than residents in the top 2 and 3 quartiles, respectively (P < 0.005), exam performance was not associated with the reported likelihood of burnout, suicidality, or mistreatment. Conclusions: Residents' emotions after the ABSITE are largely positive. Although poor exam performance may be associated with lower positive and higher negative emotion, it does not seem to be associated with the likelihood of reporting burnout, suicidality, or mistreatment. After adjusting for exam performance and emotions, mistreatment remained independently associated with burnout and suicidality. These findings support existing evidence demonstrating that burnout and suicidality are stable constructs that are robust to transient stress and/or emotions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Critical Disconnect: Residency Selection Factors Lack Correlation With Intern Performance
    (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2020) Burkhardt, John C.; Parekh, Kendra P.; Gallahue, Fiona E.; London, Kory S.; Edens, Mary A.; Humbert, A.J.; Pillow, M. Tyson; Santen, Sally A.; Hopson, Laura R.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs want to employ a selection process that will rank best possible applicants for admission into the specialty. Objective: We tested if application data are associated with resident performance using EM milestone assessments. We hypothesized that a weak correlation would exist between some selection factors and milestone outcomes. Methods: Utilizing data from 5 collaborating residency programs, a secondary analysis was performed on residents trained from 2013 to 2018. Factors in the model were gender, underrepresented in medicine status, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK), Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA), grades (EM, medicine, surgery, pediatrics), advanced degree, Standardized Letter of Evaluation global assessment, rank list position, and controls for year assessed and program. The primary outcomes were milestone level achieved in the core competencies. Multivariate linear regression models were fitted for each of the 23 competencies with comparisons made between each model's results. Results: For the most part, academic performance in medical school (Step 1, 2 CK, grades, AOA) was not associated with residency clinical performance on milestones. Isolated correlations were found between specific milestones (eg, higher surgical grade increased wound care score), but most had no correlation with residency performance. Conclusions: Our study did not find consistent, meaningful correlations between the most common selection factors and milestones at any point in training. This may indicate our current selection process cannot consistently identify the medical students who are most likely to be high performers as residents.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Emerging from the Pandemic: AAIM Recommendations for Internal Medicine Residency and Fellowship Interview Standards
    (Elsevier, 2022) Luther, Vera P.; Wininger, David A.; Lai, Cindy J.; Dao, Anthony; Garcia, Maria M.; Harper, Whitney; Chow, Timothy M.; Correa, Ricardo; Gay, Lindsey J.; Fettig, Lyle; Dalal, Bhavin; Vassallo, Patricia; Barczi, Steven; Sweet, Michelle; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Perspectives Viewpoints: •New standards are needed moving forward to guide residency and fellowship interviews in response to Coalition for Physician Accountability recommendations and dramatic changes in the interview landscape over the past 2 years. •Processes should be based on principles of equity for applicants and programs while taking into consideration personal and public health and safety. •Ongoing evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of interview practices should continue with iterative adjustments in guidance based on available data.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Global Cardiothoracic Surgery in an Academic Career: Lessons from Brazil
    (Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, 2023-08-04) Nina, Vinicius; Farkas, Emily; Ceppa, DuyKhanh; Marath, Aubyn; Surgery, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of a USMLE Step 2 Prediction Model on Medical Student Motivations
    (Sage, 2025-02-18) Shanks, Anthony L.; Steckler, Ben; Smith, Sarah; Rusk, Debra; Walvoord, Emily; Dafoe, Erin; Wallach, Paul
    PURPOSE: With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail, Step 2 CK carries added weight in the residency selection process. Our goal was to develop a Step 2 predicted score to provide to students earlier in medical school to assist with career mentoring. We also sought to understand how the predicted scores affected student’s plans. METHOD: Traditional statistical models and machine learning algorithms to identify predictors of Step 2 CK performance were utilized. Predicted scores were provided to all students in the Class of 2024 at a large allopathic medical school. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess if the estimated score in uenced career or study plans. RESULTS: The independent variables that resulted in the most predictive model included CBSE score, Organ System course exam scores and Phase 2 (Third Year Clinical Clerkships) NBME percentile scores (Step2CK= 191.984 + 0.42 (CBSE score) + 0.294 (Organ Systems) + 0.409 (Average NBME). The standard error of the prediction model was 7.6 with better accuracy for predicted scores greater than 230 (SE 8.1) as compared to less than 230 (SE 12.8). Nineteen percent of respondents changed their study plan based on the predicted score result. Themes identified from the predicted score included reassurance for career planning and the creation of anxiety and stress. CONCLUSION: A Step 2 Predicted Score, created from pre-existing metrics, was a good estimator of Step 2 CK performance. Given the timing of Step 2 CK, a predicted score would be a useful tool to counsel students during the specialty and residency selection process.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of parallel planning on residency match rate success
    (Springer Nature, 2025-03-19) Rusk, Debra; Holt, Ashley; Harvey, Brianna; Shanks, Anthony L.
    Background: Medical students targeting competitive specialties or those with lower competitiveness for their preferred specialty are encouraged to parallel apply to a less competitive field. The AAMC provides data on the number of applicants who parallel apply but little information exists on their match success. Objective: Our objective is to describe the success rates for students who parallel apply to more than one specialty. Methods: Following IRB exemption, a retrospective cohort study of Indiana University School of Medicine graduates from the 2021–2024 residency match cycles was conducted. ERAS data and match reports were reviewed to identify students who parallel applied to more than one specialty, determining their match outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed based on specialty type, and descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Between 2021 and 2024, 1,411 IUSM students applied for the match, with 225 (16%) having a parallel plan; 39% of these students matched into their preferred specialty, 56% into their parallel specialty, and 5% did not match. The most common parallel plan specialties were Anesthesiology, Orthopaedic Surgery, and OBGYN. There were no statistically significant differences in parallel application rates among surgical, hospital-based, and primary care specialties. Conclusions: Our study shows that 1 in 6 students will apply to a parallel specialty, with more than half matching into their parallel plan, making it a viable strategy for those targeting competitive specialties or with lower competitiveness. We found no difference in application rates between surgical, hospital-based, and primary care specialties, emphasizing the need for individualized competitiveness guidance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    National Pediatric Subspecialty Recruitment Sessions Increase Program Visibility and Impact Candidate Application Choices
    (Allen Press, 2023) Gans, Hayley A.; Boyer, Debra; Bales, Melissa; Fussell, Jill; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Opening Doors to Training Medical Toxicology Fellows from All Residency Backgrounds
    (Springer, 2022) Kao, Louise; Burns, Michele; Murphy, Christine; Schwarz, Evan; ACMT Fellowship Directors Committee; Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Program Signaling and Geographic Preferences in the United States Residency Match for Neurosurgery
    (Springer Nature, 2024-09-20) Ozair, Ahmad; Hanson, Jacob T.; Detchou, Donald K.; Blackwell, Matthew P.; Jenkins, Abigail; Tissot, Marianne I.; Barrie, Umaru; McDermott, Michael W.; Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine
    Postgraduate residency training has long been the cornerstone of academic medicine in the United States. The Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS), managed by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), is the central residency application platform in the United States for most clinical specialties, with the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) being the algorithm for matching residency programs with applicants. However, the determination of the best fit between ERAS applicants and programs has been increasingly challenged by the rising number of applicants per residency spot. This application overburdening across competitive specialties led to several adverse downstream effects, which affected all stakeholders. While several changes and proposals were made to rectify the issue of application overburdening, the 2020-2021 ERAS Match Cycle finally saw several competitive specialties, including otolaryngology and urology, utilize a new system of supplemental residency application based on preference signals/tokens. These tokens permit applicants to electronically signal a select number of programs in a specialty of choice, with the program reviewing the application now cognizant that they have been signaled, i.e., the applicant has chosen to use up a limited set of signals for their program. Initial results from otolaryngology and urology, as described in this article, indicated the value of this new system to both applicants and educators. Given the favorable outcomes and broader uptake of the system among other specialties, the field of neurosurgery adopted the utilization of the ERAS-based program signaling and geographic preference for the first time for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle and later opted to continue them for the 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 cycles. For the 2024-2025 Match Cycle, neurosurgery applicants have 25 signals, i.e., a "high-signal" approach, where non-signaled programs have a low interview conversion rate. This literature review discusses the rationale behind the change, the outcomes of other competitive specialties from prior cycles, the evolving nature of the change, and the potential impact on applicants and programs. As we describe in this review, signaling may potentially represent a surrogate form of an application cap. Other considerations relate to cost savings for both applicants and programs from a high-signal approach in neurosurgery. These modifications represent a foundational attempt to alleviate the application overburdening and non-holistic review in the residency application process, including for neurosurgery. While these changes have been a welcomed addition for all stakeholders in residency match cycles so far, further prospectively directed surveys along with qualitative research studies are warranted to better delineate the downstream impact of these changes and guide further optimization of the application system.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reclaiming the Calendar: Time Management for the Clinician Educator
    (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2023) Pitre, Cory J.; Pugh, Carla M.; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine