Browsing by Subject "Reconstructive surgery"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Barriers to Upper Extremity Reconstruction for Patients With Cerebral Palsy
    (Sage, 2022) Loewenstein, Scott N.; Angulo-Parker, Francisco; Timsina, Lava; Adkinson, Joshua; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Reconstructive surgery for upper extremity manifestations of cerebral palsy (CP) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, yet many potential candidates are never evaluated for surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine barriers to upper extremity reconstruction for patients with CP in a cohort of upper extremity surgeons and nonsurgeons. Methods: We sent a questionnaire to 4167 surgeons and nonsurgeon physicians, aggregated responses, and analyzed for differences in perceptions regarding surgical efficacy, patient candidacy for surgery, compliance with rehabilitation, remuneration, complexity of care, and physician comfort providing care. Results: Surgeons and nonsurgeons did not agree on the literature support of surgical efficacy (73% vs 35% agree or strongly agree, respectively). Both surgeons and nonsurgeons felt that many potential candidates exist, yet there was variability in their confidence in identifying them. Most surgeons (59%) and nonsurgeons (61%) felt comfortable performing surgery and directing the associated rehabilitation, respectively. Neither group reported that patient compliance, access to rehabilitation services, and available financial resources were a major barrier, but surgeons were more likely than nonsurgeons to feel that remuneration for services was inadequate (37% vs 13%). Both groups agreed that surgical treatments are complex and should be performed in the setting of a multidisciplinary team. Conclusions: Surgeons and nonsurgeons differ in their views regarding upper extremity reconstructive surgery for CP. Barriers to reconstruction may be addressed by performing higher level research, implementing multispecialty educational outreach, developing objective referral criteria, increasing surgical remuneration, improving access to trained upper extremity surgeons, and implementing multidisciplinary CP clinics.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Two-Stage Dual-Nerve Facial Reanimation: Outcomes and Complications in a Series of Pediatric Patients
    (Sage, 2021) McNeely, Molly M.; Liang, Fan; Makar, Katelyn; Vercler, Christian J.; Kuzon, William; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: In facial reanimation via microneurovascular muscle transfer, dual-nerve reinnervation of the muscle capitalizes on the synergistic effects of spontaneous motion from cross facial nerve grafting (CFNG) and increased excursion from masseteric nerve transfer. Two-stage approaches that delay masseteric nerve transfer until the time of the muscle flap increase spontaneity by maximizing muscle reinnervation from the CFNG. While this 2-stage, dual-nerve approach has been described in adults, we present a series of pediatric patients who underwent this reconstructive technique. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients who underwent 2-stage, dual-nerve reconstruction with CFNG and ipsilateral masseteric nerve transfers. Procedures were performed between 2004 and 2016 by 2 surgeons at a single centre. Degree of facial paralysis before and after surgical intervention was measured using House-Brackmann scores. Results: Nine patients with a mean age of 8.6 (range: 5-15 years) years at time of surgery underwent 2-stage, dual-nerve reconstruction. Average time between CFNG and transfer of the free gracilis with masseteric nerve transfer was 13.3 (SD 2.4) months. Mean follow-up was 27.3 months (SD 25.7). Patients demonstrated initiation of voluntary movement on paralyzed side by 3.6 months (SD 0.6) on average, with 3 patients demonstrating spontaneous movement at 3 months. Conclusion: The 2-stage, dual innervation technique using CFNG and delayed ipsilateral masseteric nerve transfer with a free gracilis is a promising reconstructive option to maximize spontaneous expression in pediatric patients. Validated, objective scoring systems for excursion are needed before meaningful comparisons can be made to other reconstructive strategies.