Browsing by Subject "Reconstruction"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Hispanic Ethnicity and Breast Cancer: Disaggregating Surgical Management and Mortality by Race
    (Springer, 2022) Hamad, Ahmad; Li, Yaming; Tsung, Allan; Oppong, Bridget; Eskander, Mariam F.; Bhattacharyya, Oindrila; Obeng-Gyasi, Samilia; Economics, School of Liberal Arts
    Objective: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic women. Unfortunately, few studies disaggregate Hispanic patients by race to understand its implications on treatment and clinical outcomes such as mortality. The aim of this study is to examine surgical management and overall mortality among different subgroups of women who self-identify as Hispanic. Methods: Hispanic female patients, ages 18-90, stages I-III, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2015 from the National Cancer Data Base were identified. The study cohort was divided into three ethnoracial categories: (1) Hispanic White (HW), 2) Hispanic Black (HB), and 3) Hispanic Other (HO). Descriptive statistics and multivariate models were constructed to determine the relationship between sociodemographic factors, clinical variables, surgical management, and mortality when disaggregated by race. Results: There were 56,675 Hispanic women who met the study criteria. Most where HW (n=50,599, 89.3%) and the rest were HB (n=1,334, 2.4%) and HO (n=4,742, 8.3%). There was no difference between the three groups on receipt of breast conservation therapy (P=0.12). HB (48.5%) and HO (46.6%) women were more likely to undergo reconstruction than those who identified as HW (38.7%) (P<0.001). Additionally, HB (38.3%) women were more likely to undergo tissue-based reconstruction than HW (29.0%) and HO women (30%) (P=0.0008). There was no difference between the groups in the utilization of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) (P=0.078). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in mortality between HB and HW patients (HR 1.18, 95%CI 0.92-1.51; Ref HW). However, HO women had a 24% relative risk reduction in mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.92; HW ref). Conclusion: Findings from this study suggest there are ethnoracial disparities in reconstruction utilization and mortality among Hispanic women. Future studies should examine how culture, language, healthcare access, and patient preferences contribute to these disparities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Side-to-Side Metacarpal Fusion for Reconstruction of Bone Loss in the Radial Carpometacarpal Joints
    (Elsevier, 2021-07-28) Wu, Gerald J.; Loewenstein, Scott N.; Adkinson, Joshua M.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    We present a unique case of side-to-side metacarpal fusion for reconstruction after an isolated gunshot wound to the right hand of a 19-year-old woman. There was a traumatic segmental loss of the proximal right second metacarpal base with considerable comminution of the trapezium and trapezoid. Reconstructive options were limited because of the destruction of the distal carpus and carpometacarpal (CMC) joint. Digital ray amputation was offered but deferred because of patient preference. The reconstruction was performed via metacarpal fusion of the second metacarpal remnant to the third metacarpal base, bypassing the previously destroyed second CMC joint. The fusion of the second and third metacarpals offers acceptable results when the radial CMC joints are traumatized with extensive bone loss.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Substernal reconstruction following esophagectomy: operation of last resort?
    (AME Publishing Company, 2017-12) Moremen, Jacob R.; Ceppa, DuyKhanh P.; Rieger, Karen M.; Birdas, Thomas J.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: The posterior mediastinum is the preferred location for reconstruction following esophagectomy. Occasionally alternative routes are required. We examined patient outcomes of esophageal reconstruction in order to determine whether substernal reconstruction (SR) is an equivalent alternative to orthotopic placement. Methods: Following IRB approval, we performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent an esophagectomy from 1988-2014. Only patients reconstructed with a gastric conduit and cervical anastomosis by either substernal or posterior mediastinal (PM) routes were included in the study. Endpoints assessed included anastomotic leak rate, post-operative complications, reoperation, hospital length of stay, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Results: Thirty-three patients underwent SR and 182 had a PM gastric conduit with cervical anastomosis. The SR pathology was predominantly benign while PM was mostly malignant. Sixteen SR patients had a delayed reconstruction after prior diversion. Mean hospital LOS was longer in the SR group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in 30- and 90-day mortality. PM patients had significantly fewer respiratory complications (P<0.04), reoperations (P<0.04), and transfusions (P<0.0001) and a trend towards fewer anastomotic leaks (17.1% vs. 30.3%; P<0.09). Conclusions: This single institution experience demonstrated no significant difference in mortality between substernal and PM reconstruction following esophagectomy. However, SR was associated with significantly increased LOS and morbidity, including a trend toward increased anastomotic leaks. SR reconstruction should probably be considered an option of last resort.