- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Racial and ethnic disparities"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Care Utilization Among Patients With Glomerular Disease(Elsevier, 2023) Krissberg, Jill R.; O’Shaughnessy, Michelle M.; Smith, Abigail R.; Helmuth, Margaret E.; Almaani, Salem; Aviles, Diego H.; Brathwaite, Kaye E.; Cai, Yi; Cattran, Daniel; Gbadegesin, Rasheed; Glenn, Dorey A.; Greenbaum, Larry A.; Iragorri, Sandra; Jain, Koyal; Khalid, Myda; Kidd, Jason; Kopp, Jeffrey; Lafayette, Richard; Lane, Jerome C.; Lugani, Francesca; Nestor, Jordan G.; Parekh, Rulan S.; Reidy, Kimberly; Selewski, David T.; Sethna, Christine B.; Sperati, C. John; Tuttle, Katherine; Twombley, Katherine; Vasylyeva, Tetyana L.; Weaver, Donald J., Jr.; Wenderfer, Scott E.; Gibson, Keisha; CureGN Consortium; Pediatrics, School of MedicineRationale & objective: The effects of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and disease severity on acute care utilization in patients with glomerular disease are unknown. Study design: Prospective cohort study. Setting & participants: 1,456 adults and 768 children with biopsy-proven glomerular disease enrolled in the Cure Glomerulonephropathy (CureGN) cohort. Exposure: Race and ethnicity as a participant-reported social factor. Outcome: Acute care utilization defined as hospitalizations or emergency department visits. Analytical approach: Multivariable recurrent event proportional rate models were used to estimate associations between race and ethnicity and acute care utilization. Results: Black or Hispanic participants had lower SES and more severe glomerular disease than White or Asian participants. Acute care utilization rates were 45.6, 29.5, 25.8, and 19.2 per 100 person-years in Black, Hispanic, White, and Asian adults, respectively, and 55.8, 42.5, 40.8, and 13.0, respectively, for children. Compared with the White race (reference group), Black race was significantly associated with acute care utilization in adults (rate ratio [RR], 1.76 [95% CI, 1.37-2.27]), although this finding was attenuated after multivariable adjustment (RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.03-1.68]). Black race was not significantly associated with acute care utilization in children; Asian race was significantly associated with lower acute care utilization in children (RR, 0.32 [95% CI 0.14-0.70]); no significant associations between Hispanic ethnicity and acute care utilization were identified. Limitations: We used proxies for SES and lacked direct information on income, household unemployment, or disability. Conclusions: Significant differences in acute care utilization rates were observed across racial and ethnic groups in persons with prevalent glomerular disease, although many of these difference were explained by differences in SES and disease severity. Measures to combat socioeconomic disadvantage in Black patients and to more effectively prevent and treat glomerular disease are needed to reduce disparities in acute care utilization, improve patient wellbeing, and reduce health care costs.Item Racial and ethnic disparities in psychosocial evaluation and liver transplant waitlisting(2023-06-01) Deutch-Link, Sasha; Bittermann, Therese; Nephew, Lauren; Ross-Driscoll, Katherine; Weinberg, Ethan M.; Weinrieb, Robert M.; Olthoff, Kim M.; Addis, Senayish; Serper, MarinaHealth disparities have been well-described in all stages of the liver transplantation (LT) process. Using data from psychosocial evaluations and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment, our objective was to investigate potential racial and ethnic inequities in overall LT waitlisting and not waitlisting for medical or psychosocial reasons. In a cohort of 2271 candidates evaluated for LT from 2014 to 2021 and with 1-8 years of follow-up, no significant associations were noted between race/ethnicity and overall waitlisting and not waitlisting for medical reasons. However, compared with White race, Black race (odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.56) and Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.16-3.78) were associated with not waitlisting for psychosocial reasons. After adjusting for sociodemographic variables, the relationship persisted in both populations: Black (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12-3.38) and Hispanic/Latinx (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.08-4.86) (reference group, White). High-risk Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment scores were more prevalent in Black and Hispanic/Latinx patients, likely reflecting upstream factors and structural racism. Health systems and LT centers should design programs to combat these disparities and improve equity in access to LT.