Browsing by Subject "Qualitative analysis"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Online, Modular Curriculum Enhances Surgical Education and Improves Learning Outcomes in East, Central, and Southern Africa: A Mixed-Methods Study
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022-03-02) Parker, Andrea S.; Steffes, Bruce C.; Hill, Katherine; Bachheta, Niraj; Mangaoang, Deirdre; Mwachiro, Michael; Torbeck, Laura; White, Russell E.; Bekele, Abebe; Parker, Robert K.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Objective: We aimed to determine the impact of a standardized curriculum on learning outcomes for surgical trainees in East, Central, and Southern Africa (ECSA). Background: As surgical education expands throughout ECSA, there is a recognized need for a standardized curriculum. We previously described the design of a novel, large-scale, flipped-classroom, surgical curriculum for trainees in ECSA. Methods: In January 2020, the first year of curricular content for trainees of the College of Surgeons of ECSA was released, containing 11 monthly thematic topics, each with 2 to 5 weekly modular subtopics. We aimed to evaluate 3 outcomes utilizing data sources incorporated into the curriculum structure. Learner engagement was assessed by the number of trainees completing curriculum topics. User experience was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative feedback responses to embedded surveys for each content week. Curriculum impact on trainee examination performance was assessed by comparing certification examination scores stratified by the number of curricular topics each trainee completed. Results: Two hundred seventy-one trainees (96%) in 17 countries accessed at least 1 weekly module. Trainees completed a median of 9 topics (interquartile range: 6-10). The feedback survey response rate was 92% (5742/6233). Quantitative and qualitative responses were positive in overall module value (93.7% + 2.6%), amount of learning experienced (97.9% + 1.4%), confidence in achieving learning objectives (97.1% + 2.4%), and ease of use of the module (77.6% + 5.98%). Topic-related certification examination performance improved significantly with increased completion of thematic topics. Conclusions: A standardized surgical curriculum in ECSA demonstrated excellent trainee usage, positive feedback, and improved examination scores.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Internal medicine physician job satisfaction in rural Montana and Northern Wyoming- a qualitative analysis
    (Taylor & Francis, 2019-11) Renjel, Robert A.; Ficalora, Robert; Canaris, Gay; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Shortage of physicians in rural areas within the USA is an ongoing issue. There are limited data about why internal medicine physicians ('internists') practice in rural areas throughout the USA. We explored reasons why internists chose rural practice locations in Montana and Northern Wyoming, and reasons for overall job satisfaction in these areas. Methods: We used the phenomenological method of qualitative analysis for the study. The principal investigator (RR) conducted and voice recorded 17 semi-structured interviews, throughout Montana and two counties in Northern Wyoming. The voice recordings were transcribed and analyzed according to thematic analysis. Results: Four main themes emerged, outlining why internists chose to practice in rural areas, and why internists reported overall job satisfaction. The main reason internists reported for choosing rural practices was a rural background or the appeal of rural lifestyle. Reasons reported for overall job satisfaction by internists in rural areas included wide breadth of practice, flexibility of rural practice model and the work environment and administrative support for practice. Conclusion: Despite shortages of health care providers in rural areas, a number of internists show ongoing commitment to practicing in these areas. Hopefully, our study will help rural practices, hospitals and residency programs in Montana and Northern Wyoming with future hiring decisions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A qualitative analysis of calorie menu labeling: Point of sale conversations with cashiers at fast-casual retsaurants
    (2015-05) Bechtel, Kimberly; Parrish-Sprowl, John; Goering, Elizabeth M.; Sandwina, Ronald M.
    The study was conducted to examine the communication between the customer and the cashier at the point of purchase in the process of determining the impact of the labeling laws. This study used an inductive qualitative design for data collection and data analysis. Data from this study suggest that calorie counts on menu labels are discussed frequently between the customer and the cashier at the point of sale at fast-casual restaurants. The data found gives us a framework and rationale as to why previous research on the effectiveness of the calorie labeling law in the Affordable Care Act have yet to make a significant impact in reducing consumer’s total daily caloric intake when eating food away from the home and found three specific reasons as to why the calorie labeling law may not be working the way the government intended it to. First, consumers at fast-casual restaurants rely on the cashiers as calorie guides because they are not aware or knowledgeable about the recommended daily caloric intake and often underestimate the total calories in their meals. Secondly, the study’s findings indicate that when restaurants offer lower calorie choices and downsizing options like a “small pita” at Pita Pit instead of a “regular pita”, many consumers buy the downsized item or smaller portion but food chains are not downsizing their signature items. Third, the study examined if the cashiers are trained in any way to discuss new regulations and calorie count/nutritional value and not one cashier was trained specifically about the calorie labeling law and why certain foods on the menu have more calories than others even though they are influencing decision making. Conversations at the point of sale have been routinely ignored in research about the calorie labeling law and this research helps to understand the choices consumers are making with the newly implemented calorie labeling regulation. The results from this study helps us further advance our understanding as to why consumers make the food choices they do while eating at restaurants.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not: A qualitative analysis
    (Wiley, 2019-12) Burke Draucker, Claire; Rawl, Susan M.; Vode, Emilee; Carter-Harris, Lisa; School of Nursing
    Background Although new screening programmes with low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer have been implemented throughout the United States, screening uptake remains low and screening‐eligible persons' decisions to screen or not remain poorly understood. Objective To describe how current and former long‐term smokers explain their decisions regarding participation in lung cancer screening. Design Phone interviews using a semi‐structured interview guide were conducted to ask screening‐eligible persons to describe their decisions regarding screening with LDCT. The interviews were transcribed and analysed with conventional content analytic techniques. Setting and participants A subsample of 40 participants (20 who had screened and 20 who had not) were drawn from the sample of a survey study whose participants were recruited by Facebook targeted advertisements. Results The sample was divided into the following five groups based on their decisions regarding lung cancer screening participation: Group 1: no intention to be screened, Group 2: no deliberate consideration but somewhat open to being screened, Group 3: deliberate consideration but no definitive decision to be screened, Group 4: intention to be screened and Group 5: had been screened. Reasons for screening participation decisions are described for each group. Across groups, data revealed that screening‐eligible persons have a number of misconceptions regarding LDCT, including that a scan is needed only if one is symptomatic or has not had a chest x‐ray. A physician recommendation was a key influence on decisions to screen. Discussion and conclusions Education initiatives aimed at providers and long‐term smokers regarding LDCT is needed. Quality patient/provider communication is most likely to improve screening rates.