Browsing by Subject "Pulmonary exacerbation"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Antipseudomonal treatment decisions during CF exacerbation management
    (Elsevier, 2022) VanDevanter, D. R.; West, N. E.; Sanders, D. B.; Skalland, M.; Goss, C. H.; Flume, P. A.; Heltshe, S. L.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) treatment guidelines suggest that Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) airway infection be treated with two antipseudomonal agents. Methods: We retrospectively studied treatment responses for STOP2 PEx treatment trial (NCT02781610) participants with a history of Pa infection. Mean lung function and symptom changes from intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment start to Visit 2 (7 to 10 days later) were compared between those receiving one, two, and three+ antipseudomonal classes before Visit 2 by ANCOVA. Odds of PEx retreatment with IV antimicrobials within 30 days and future IV-treated PEx hazard were modeled by logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively. Sensitivity analyses limited to the most common one-, two-, and three-class regimens, to only IV/oral antipseudomonal treatments, and with more stringent Pa infection definitions were conducted. Results: Among 751 participants, 50 (6.7%) were treated with one antipseudomonal class before Visit 2, while 552 (73.5%) and 149 (19.8%) were treated with two and with three+ classes, respectively. Females and participants with a negative Pa culture in the prior month were more likely to be treated with a single class. The most common single, double, and triple class regimens were beta-lactam (BL; n = 42), BL/aminoglycoside (AG; n = 459), and BL/AG/fluoroquinolone (FQ; n = 73). No lung function or symptom response, odds of retreatment, or future PEx hazard differences were observed by number of antipseudomonal classes administered in primary or sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: We were unable to identify additional benefit when multiple antipseudomonal classes are used to treat PEx in people with CF and Pa.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Changes in Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic for People with Cystic Fibrosis
    (American Thoracic Society, 2022) Sanders, Don B.; Wu, Runyu; O’Neil, Tom; Elbert, Alexander; Petren, Kris; Jain, Raksha; Ren, Clement L.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Rationale: Cystic fibrosis (CF) centers transitioned to telemedicine during the spring 2020 peak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Objectives: We hypothesized that people with CF (pwCF) with more severe disease would be more likely to be seen in-person. Methods: We used paired t tests to compare within-subject changes in body mass index (BMI) and percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and calculated relative risk (RR) to compare pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) between pwCF enrolled in the CF Foundation Patient Registry with at least one in-person clinic visit after March 15 in both 2019 and 2020. Results: Overall, the proportion of clinical encounters that were in-person clinic visits decreased from 91% in 2019 to a low of 9% in April 2020. Among pwCF seen after March 15 in both 2019 and 2020, the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) FEV1 percentage predicted was 1.3% (0.1-2.4) predicted higher in 2020 for children 6 to <12 years of age, and 7.5% (7.1-7.9) predicted higher in 2020 among pwCF ⩾12 years of age eligible for the highly effective CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI). There was no difference in FEV1 percentage predicted for pwCF ⩾12 years of age who were not eligible for ETI. Similarly, the mean (95% CI) BMI was 2.4 (2.0-2.8) percentile higher in 2020 for children 6 to <12 years of age and 5.2 (4.8-5.7) percentile higher in 2020 among children 12 to <18 years of age eligible for ETI. Mean (95% CI) BMI was 1.2 (1.2-1.3) (kg/m2) higher for pwCF ⩾18 years of age eligible for ETI, and 0.2 (0.1-0.3) (kg/m2) higher for pwCF ⩾18 years of age not eligible for ETI. The proportion of in-person clinic visits where any PEx was present was lower in 2020 compared with 2019, 25% compared with 38%, RR 0.82 (0.79-0.86). Conclusions: The care of pwCF was substantially changed during the spring 2020 peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among pwCF seen in-person in both 2019 and 2020 after the spring peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, lung function and BMI were higher in 2020 for children 6 to <12 years of age and pwCF eligible for ETI.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Defining and identifying early-onset lung disease in cystic fibrosis with cumulative clinical characteristics
    (Wiley, 2022) Huang, Leslie; Lai, HuiChuan J.; Antos, Nicholas; Rock, Michael J.; Asfour, Fadi; Howenstine, Michelle; Gaffin, Jonathan M.; Farrell, Philip M.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Because of the heterogeneity in cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease among young children, a clinical method to identify early-onset lung disease is needed. Objective: To develop a CF early-onset lung disease (CFELD) scoring system by utilizing prospectively collected longitudinal data on manifestations in the first 3 years of life. Design: We studied 145 infants born during 2012-2017, diagnosed through newborn screening by age 3 months, and followed to 36 months of age. Cough severity, pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), respiratory cultures, and hospitalizations were collected at each CF center visit (every 1-2 months in infancy and quarterly thereafter). These data were used to construct the CFELD system and to classify lung disease into five categories: asymptomatic, minimal, mild, moderate, and severe. Results: The most frequent manifestation of CF early lung disease was MD-reported PEx episodes, PEx hospitalizations, and positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures. Parent-reported cough severity was correlated with the number of respiratory hospitalizations (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). The distribution of CFELD categories was 10% asymptomatic, 17% minimal, 29% mild, 33% moderate, and 12% severe. The moderate and severe categories occurred threefold higher in pancreatic insufficient (PI, 49%) versus sufficient subjects (16%), p < 0.0001. In addition to PI, gastrointestinal and nutrition-related hospitalizations, plasma cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10, duration of CFTR modulator therapy, and type of health insurance were significant predictors of CFELD scores. Conclusion: The CFELD scoring system is novel, allows systematic evaluation of lung disease prognosis early, and may aid in therapeutic decision-making particularly in the initiation of CFTR modulator therapy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Health care costs in a randomized trial of antimicrobial duration among cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary exacerbations
    (Elsevier, 2022) Gold, Laura S.; Hansen, Ryan N.; Patrick, Donald L.; Tabah, Ashley; Heltshe, Sonya L.; Flume, Patrick A.; Goss, Christopher H.; West, Natalie E.; Sanders, Don B.; VanDevanter, Donald R.; Kessler, Larry; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: The purpose of these analyses was to determine whether overall costs were reduced in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients experiencing pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) who received shorter versus longer durations of treatment. Methods: Among people with CF experiencing PEx, we calculated 30-day inpatient, outpatient, emergency room, and medication costs and summed these to derive total costs in 2020 USD. Using the Kaplan-Meier sample average (KMSA) method, we calculated adjusted costs and differences in costs within two pairs of randomized groups: early robust responders (ERR) randomized to receive treatment for 10 days (ERR-10 days) or 14 days (ERR-14 days), and non-early robust responders (NERR) randomized to receive treatment for 14 days (NERR-14 days) or 21 days (NERR-21 days). Results: Patients in the shorter treatment duration groups had shorter lengths of stay per hospitalization (mean ± standard deviation (SD) for ERR-10 days: 7.9 ± 3.0 days per hospitalization compared to 10.1 ± 4.2 days in ERR-14 days; for NERR-14 days: 8.7 ± 4.9 days per hospitalization compared to 9.6 ± 6.5 days in NERR-21 days). We found statistically significantly lower adjusted mean costs (95% confidence interval) among those who were randomized to receive shorter treatment durations (ERR-10 days: $60,800 ($59,150 - $62,430) vs $74,420 ($72,610 - $76,450) in ERR-14 days; NERR-14 days: $66,690 ($65,960-$67,400) versus $74,830 ($73,980-$75,650) in NERR-21 days). Conclusions: Tied with earlier evidence that shorter treatment duration was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, our analyses indicate that treating with shorter antimicrobial durations can reduce costs without diminishing clinical outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Poor recovery from a pulmonary exacerbation does not lead to accelerated FEV1 decline
    (Elsevier, 2017-07-29) Sanders, Don B.; Li, Zhanhai; Zhao, Qianqian; Farrell, Philip; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Patients with CF treated for pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) may experience faster subsequent declines in FEV1. Additionally, incomplete recovery to baseline FEV1 occurs frequently following PEx treatment. Whether accelerated declines in FEV1 are preceded by poor PEx recovery has not been studied. METHODS: Using 2004 to 2011 CF Foundation Patient Registry data, we randomly selected one PEx among patients ≥6years of age with no organ transplantations, ≥12months of data before and after the PEx, and ≥1 FEV1 recorded within the 6months before and 3months after the PEx. We defined poor PEx recovery as the best FEV1 in the 3months after the PEx <90% of the best FEV1 in the 6months before the PEx. We calculated mean (95% CI) hazard ratios (HR) of having >5% predicted/year FEV1 decline and poor PEx recovery using multi-state Markov models. RESULTS: From 13,954 PEx, FEV1 declines of >5% predicted/year were more likely to precede poor spirometric recovery, HR 1.17 (1.08, 1.26), in Markov models adjusted for age and sex. Non-Responders were less likely to have a subsequent fast FEV1 decline, HR 0.41 (0.37, 0.46), than patients who recovered to >90% of baseline FEV1 following PEx treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated declines in FEV1 are more likely to precede a PEx with poor recovery than to occur in the following year. Preventing or halting declines in FEV1 may also have the benefit of preventing PEx episodes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Re-examining baseline lung function recovery following IV-treated pulmonary exacerbations
    (Elsevier, 2023) Heltshe, Sonya L.; Russell, Renee; VanDevanter, Donald R.; Sanders, Don B.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    CF registry pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) analyses have employed "before and after" spirometry recovery, where the best percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) prior to PEx ("baseline") is compared to the best ppFEV1 <3 months post-PEx. This methodology lacks comparators and ascribes recovery failure to PEx. Herein, we describe 2014 CF Foundation Patient Registry PEx analyses including a comparator: recovery around nonPEx events, birthdays. 49.6% of 7357 individuals with PEx achieved baseline ppFEV1 recovery while 36.6% of 14,141 achieved baseline recovery after birthdays; individuals with both PEx and birthdays were more likely to recover baseline after PEx than after birthdays (47% versus 34%); mean ppFEV1 declines were 0.3 (SD=9.3) and 3.1 (9.3), respectively. Post-event measure number had more effect on baseline recovery than did real ppFEV1 loss in simulations, suggesting that PEx recovery analyses lacking comparators are prone to artifact and poorly describe PEx contributions to disease progression.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Study design considerations for the Standardized Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations 2 (STOP2): A trial to compare intravenous antibiotic treatment durations in CF
    (Elsevier, 2018-01) Heltshe, Sonya L.; West, Natalie E.; VanDevanter, Donald R.; Sanders, D. B.; Beckett, Valeria V.; Flume, Patrick A.; Goss, Christopher H.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and contribute to morbidity and mortality. Duration of IV antibiotic therapy to treat PEx varies widely in the US, and there are few data to guide treatment decisions. METHODS: We combined a survey of CF stakeholders with retrospective analyses of a recent observational study of CF PEx to design a multicenter, randomized, prospective study comparing the efficacy and safety of different durations of IV antibiotics for PEx to meet the needs of people with CF and their caregivers. RESULTS: IV antibiotic duration was cited as the most important PEx research question by responding CF physicians and top concern among surveyed CF patients/caregivers. During PEx, forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1% predicted) and symptom responses at 7-10days of IV antibiotics identified two distinct groups: early robust responders (ERR) who subsequently experienced greater FEV1 improvements compared to non-ERR (NERR). In addition to greater FEV1 and symptom responses, only 14% of ERR patients were treated with IV antibiotics for >15days, compared with 45% of NERR patients. CONCLUSIONS: A divergent trial design that evaluates subjects' interim improvement in FEV1 and symptoms to tailor randomization to IV treatment duration (10 vs. 14days for ERR, 14 vs. 21days for NERR) may alleviate physician and patient concerns about excess or inadequate treatment. Such a study has the potential to provide evidence necessary to standardize IV antibiotic duration in CF PEx care -a first step to conducting PEx research of other treatment features.