- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Psychosocial functioning"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Physical Symptoms, Distress, and Functional Disability in Youth With Chronic Orthostatic Intolerance(Oxford University Press, 2022) Tsai Owens, Michele S.; Biggs, Bridget K.; Fahrenkamp, Amy C.; Geske, Jennifer; Hofschulte, Deanna R.; Harbeck-Weber, Cynthia; Fischer, Philip R.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineObjective: Youth with chronic orthostatic intolerance (OI) can experience significant physical, social, and academic functional debilitation. Previous studies have indicated associations among symptom severity, psychosocial factors, and functional disability. However, empirically tested models explaining how different medical and psychosocial factors may contribute to functional disability are lacking. The current cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate mediation, moderation, and additive models of the effect of physical symptoms and psychological distress on functional disability. Methods: One hundred and sixty-five youth (13-22 years old) undergoing medical evaluation of chronic OI symptoms completed measures of autonomic dysfunction symptom severity, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and functional disability. Models were evaluated using tests of indirect effects and linear and logistic regression analyses. Results: Results supported the mediation and additive effects models for depressive symptoms. Mediation, moderation, and additive models for hypothesized effects of anxiety symptoms were not supported. Conclusions: Results provide preliminary support for models in which OI symptoms affect functional debility via their effects on mood and in which depressive symptoms have unique and additive effects on functioning. Findings lay the foundation for longitudinal and experimental evaluation of biopsychosocial models of functional disability in youth with chronic OI and related conditions. Implications include the importance of a biopsychosocial conceptualization of OI symptoms and debility as a complex interplay of factors rather than as a purely physiological or psychological process.Item Relations of Mindfulness and Illness Acceptance With Psychosocial Functioning in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Caregivers(Oncology Nursing Society, 2020-11-01) Chinh, Kelly; Secinti, Ekin; Johns, Shelly A.; Hirsh, Adam T.; Miller, Kathy D.; Schneider, Bryan; Storniolo, Anna Maria; Mina, Lida; Newton, Erin V.; Champion, Victoria L.; Mosher, Catherine E.; Psychology, School of ScienceObjectives: To examine relationships in mindfulness and illness acceptance and psychosocial functioning in patients with metastatic breast cancer and their family caregivers. Sample & setting: 33 dyads from an academic cancer center in the United States. Methods & variables: Participants completed questionnaires on mindfulness, illness acceptance, relationship quality, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Dyadic, cross-sectional data were analyzed using actor-partner interdependence models. Results: Greater nonjudging, acting with awareness, and illness acceptance among caregivers were associated with patients' and caregivers' perceptions of better relationship quality. Higher levels of these processes were associated with reduced anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients and caregivers. Implications for nursing: Aspects of mindfulness and illness acceptance in dyads confer benefits that are primarily intrapersonal in nature. Nurses may consider introducing mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions to patients and caregivers with adjustment difficulties.Item Social Dysfunction in Psychosis Is More Than a Matter of Misperception: Advances From the Study of Metacognition(Frontiers Media, 2021-10-14) Lysaker, Paul H.; Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit; Wiesepape, Courtney; Huling, Kelsey; Musselman, Aubrie; Lysaker, John T.; Psychiatry, School of MedicineMany with psychosis experience substantial difficulties forming and maintaining social bonds leading to persistent social alienation and a lack of a sense of membership in a larger community. While it is clear that social impairments in psychosis cannot be fully explained by symptoms or other traditional features of psychosis, the antecedents of disturbances in social function remain poorly understood. One recent model has proposed that deficits in social cognition may be a root cause of social dysfunction. In this model social relationships become untenable among persons diagnosed with psychosis when deficits in social cognition result in inaccurate ideas of what others feel, think or desire. While there is evidence to support the influence of social cognition upon social function, there are substantial limitations to this point of view. Many with psychosis have social impairments but not significant deficits in social cognition. First person and clinical accounts of the phenomenology of psychosis also do not suggest that persons with psychosis commonly experience making mistakes when trying to understand others. They report instead that intersubjectivity, or the formation of an intimate shared understanding of thoughts and emotions with others, has become extraordinarily difficult. In this paper we explore how research in metacognition in psychosis can transcend these limitations and address some of the ways in which intersubjectivity and more broadly social function is compromised in psychosis. Specifically, research will be reviewed on the relationship between social cognitive abilities and social function in psychosis, including measurement strategies and limits to its explanatory power, in particular with regard to challenges to intersubjectivity. Next, we present research on the integrated model of metacognition in psychosis and its relation to social function. We then discuss how this model might go beyond social cognitive models of social dysfunction in psychosis by describing how compromises in intersubjectivity occur as metacognitive deficits leave persons without an integrated sense of others' purposes, relative positions in the world, possibilities and personal complexities. We suggest that while social cognitive deficits may leave persons with inaccurate ideas about others, metacognitive deficits leave persons ill equipped to make broader sense of the situations in which people interact and this is what leaves them without a holistic sense of the other and what makes it difficult to know others, share experiences, and sustain relationships. The potential of developing clinical interventions focused on metacognition for promoting social recovery will finally be explored.