Browsing by Subject "Proxy"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers’ Religious and Spiritual Beliefs with End of Life Decisions
    (Elsevier, 2020-02) Torke, Alexia M.; Fitchett, George; Maiko, Saneta; Burke, Emily S.; Slaven, James E.; Newton Watson, Beth; Ivy, Steven; Monahan, Patrick O.; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    Context: Although religion and spirituality are important to surrogate decision makers, little is known about the role of religion in decision making regarding life-sustaining treatments. Objectives: To determine the relationships between dimensions of religion and spirituality and medical treatment decisions made by surrogates. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled patient/surrogate dyads from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. Eligible patients were 65 years or older and admitted to the medicine or medical intensive care services. Baseline surveys between hospital days 2 and 10 assessed seven dimensions of religion and spirituality. Chart reviews of the electronic medical record and regional health information exchange six months after enrollment identified the use of life-sustaining treatments and hospice for patients who died. Results: There were 291 patient/surrogate dyads. When adjusting for other religious dimensions, demographic, and illness factors, only surrogates' belief in miracles was significantly associated with a lower surrogate preference for do-not-resuscitate status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.78). Among patients who died, higher surrogate intrinsic religiosity was associated with lower patient receipt of life-sustaining treatments within the last 30 days (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45, 0.97). Belief in miracles (aOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10, 0.96) and higher intrinsic religiosity (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53, 0.93) were associated with lower hospice utilization. Conclusion: Few religious variables are associated with end-of-life preferences or treatment. Belief in miracles and intrinsic religiosity may affect treatment and should be identified and explored with surrogates by trained chaplains or other clinicians with appropriate training.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Factors Associated With Posthospital Nursing Facility Discharge for Patients With Impaired Decision Making
    (Elsevier, 2018-10) Carnahan, Jennifer L.; Inger, Lev; Young, Robert S.; Slaven, James E.; Torke, Alexia M.; Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Religion and Spirituality in Surrogate Decision Making for Hospitalized Older Adults
    (Springer, 2016-06) Geros-Willfond, Kristin N.; Ivy, Steven S.; Montz, Kianna; Bohan, Sara E.; Torke, Alexia M.; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine
    We conducted semi-structured interviews with 46 surrogate decision makers for hospitalized older adults to characterize the role of spirituality and religion in decision making. Three themes emerged: (1) religion as a guide to decision making, (2) control, and (3) faith, death and dying. For religious surrogates, religion played a central role in end of life decisions. There was variability regarding whether God or humans were perceived to be in control; however, beliefs about control led to varying perspectives on acceptance of comfort-focused treatment. We conclude that clinicians should attend to religious considerations due to their impact on decision making.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey
    (Elsevier, 2017-01) Torke, Alexia M.; Monahan, Patrick; Callahan, Christopher M.; Helft, Paul R.; Sachs, Greg A.; Wocial, Lucia D.; Slaven, James E.; Montz, Kianna; Inger, Lev; Burke, Emily; Medicine, School of Medicine
    CONTEXT: Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. METHODS: After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. RESULTS: Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation -0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (-0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.