ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Primary Prevention"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 23
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Disclosure and rationality: comparative risk information and decision-making about prevention
    (Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 2009) Schwartz, Peter H.
    With the growing focus on prevention in medicine, studies of how to describe risk have become increasing important. Recently, some researchers have argued against giving patients "comparative risk information," such as data about whether their baseline risk of developing a particular disease is above or below average. The concern is that giving patients this information will interfere with their consideration of more relevant data, such as the specific chance of getting the disease (the "personal risk"), the risk reduction the treatment provides, and any possible side effects. I explore this view and the theories of rationality that ground it, and I argue instead that comparative risk information can play a positive role in decision-making. The criticism of disclosing this sort of information to patients, I conclude, rests on a mistakenly narrow account of the goals of prevention and the nature of rational choice in medicine.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening
    (Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2008-06) Meslin, Eric M.; Schwartz, Peter H.
    Some experts have argued that patients should routinely be told the specific magnitude and absolute probability of potential risks and benefits of screening tests. This position is motivated by the idea that framing risk information in ways that are less precise violates the ethical principle of respect for autonomy and its application in informed consent or shared decision-making. In this Perspective, we consider a number of problems with this view that have not been adequately addressed. The most important challenges stem from the danger that patients will misunderstand the information or have irrational responses to it. Any initiative in this area should take such factors into account and should consider carefully how to apply the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Bulletin, 1901 Vol. 3 No. 2
    (1901)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Bulletin, 1901 Vol. 3 No. 6
    (1901)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Monthly Bulletin, 1900 Vol. 1 No. 6
    (1900)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Monthly Bulletin, 1903 Vol. 5 No. 10
    (1903)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Monthly Bulletin, 1904 Vol. 6 No. 10
    (1904)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Monthly Bulletin, 1904 Vol. 6 No. 12
    (1904)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Monthly Bulletin, 1904 Vol. 6 No. 7
    (1904)
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Indiana State Board of Health Monthly Bulletin, 1904 Vol. 6 No. 8
    (1904)
  • «
  • 1 (current)
  • 2
  • 3
  • »
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University