Browsing by Subject "Presumptive treatment"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Findings From a Scoping Review: Presumptive Treatment for Chlamydiatrachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States, 2006-2021
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Allen, Katie S.; Hinrichs, Rachel; Heumann, Christine L.; Titus, Melissa K.; Duszynski, Thomas J.; Valvi, Nimish R.; Wiensch, Ashley; Tao, Guoyu; Dixon, Brian E.; University Library
    Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the two most common reported sexually transmitted infections in the USA. Current recommendations are to presumptively treat CT and/or GC in persons with symptoms or known contact. This review characterizes the literature around studies with presumptive treatment, including identifying rates of presumptive treatment and over- and under-treatment rates. Of the 18 articles that met our inclusion criteria, six pertained to outpatient settings. In the outpatient setting, presumptive treatment rates, for both asymptomatic and symptomic patients, varied from 12% - 100%, and the percent positive of those presumptively treated ranged from 25% - 46%. Three studies also reported data on positive results in patients not presumptively treated, which ranged from 2% - 9%. Two studies reported median follow-up time for untreated, which was roughly nine days. The remaining 12 articles pertained to the emergency setting where presumptive treatment rates, for both asymptomatic and symptomic patients, varied from 16% - 91%, the percent positive following presumptive treatment ranged from 14% - 59%. Positive results without presumptive treatment ranged from 4% - 52%. Two studies reported the percent positive without any treatment (6% and 32% respectively) and one reported follow-up time for untreated infections (median: 4.8 days). Rates of presumptive treatment, as well as rates of over- or under- treatment vary widely across studies and within care settings. Given large variability in presumptive treatment, the focus on urban settings, and minimal focus on social determinants of health, additional studies are needed to guide treatment practices for CT and GC in outpatient and emergency settings.