Browsing by Subject "Phospholipases"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    THE ROLE OF THE NMDA RECEPTOR AND REVERSE SODIUM CALCIUM EXCHANGER IN CALCIUM DYSREGULATION IN GLUTAMATE-EXPOSED NEURONS
    (2012-10-29) Brittain, Matthew K.; Brustovetsky, Nickolay; Cummins, Theodore R.; Nass, Richard M.; Nicol, Grant D.; Vasko, Michael R.
    Introduction: During glutamate excitotoxicity, overstimulation of glutamate receptors leads to sustained elevation in cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]c), or delayed Ca2+ dysregulation (DCD), which is causally linked to cell death. There are two major hypothetical mechanisms for DCD: the continuous activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate-subtype of the ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDAR) and the reversal of the plasmalemmal Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. However, the contribution of each of these mechanisms in DCD is not completely established. Major results: Neurons exposed to excitotoxic glutamate produced DCD, an increase in cytosolic Na+ ([Na+]c), and plasma membrane depolarization. MK801 and memantine, noncompetitive NMDAR inhibitors, added after glutamate, completely prevented DCD; however AP-5, a competitive NMDAR inhibitor, failed to do so. The NMDAR inhibitors had no effect on lowering elevated [Na+]c or on restoring plasma membrane potential, which are conditions suggesting NCXrev could be involved. In experiments inducing NCXrev, MK801 and memantine completely inhibited Ca2+ dysregulation after glutamate while AP-5 did not. Inhibition of NCXrev, either with KB-R7943 or by preventing the increase in [Na+]c, failed to avert DCD. However, NCXrev inhibition combined with NMDAR blocked by AP-5 completely prevented DCD. Overall, these data suggested that both NMDAR and NCXrev are essential for glutamate-induced DCD, and inhibition of only one mechanism is insufficient to prevent collapse of calcium homeostasis. Based on the data above, we investigated a NMDA receptor antagonist currently in clinical trials for reducing the effects of glutamate excitotoxicity, ifenprodil. Ifenprodil is an activity-dependent, NMDAR inhibitor selective for the NR2B subunit. We found that ifenprodil not only inhibited the NR2B-specific NMDAR, but also inhibited NCXrev. If ifenprodil is combined with PEAQX, a NMDAR inhibitor selective for the NR2A subunit, low concentrations of both inhibitors completely prevent DCD. Conclusion: The inhibition of a single Ca2+ influx mechanism is insufficient in preventing DCD, which requires simultaneous inhibition of both the NMDAR and NCXrev. These findings are critical for the correct interpretation of the experimental results obtained with these inhibitors and for better understanding of their neuroprotective actions.