Browsing by Subject "Philanthropy Panel Study"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    16 Years of Charitable Giving Research
    (2019-12-12) Osili, Una; Clark, Chelsea; Han, Xiao
    The underlying data for this research brief is drawn from the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy’s Philanthropy Panel Study (PPS)—a signature research project of the school. The PPS, formerly known as the Center on Philanthropy Panel Study (COPPS), follows the same families’ philanthropic behaviors throughout their lives. The study provides nonprofit sector professionals, fundraisers, policymakers and public officials a unique perspective of household giving and volunteering behaviors over time.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Changes to the Giving Landscape
    (2019-10-22) Clark, Chelsea; Han, Xiao; Osili, Una
    This report presents a detailed analysis of shifts in American household giving from the year 2000 to 2016, which includes information about giving behaviors from before (2000-2008) and after (2010-2016) the Great Recession (which occurred from December 2007-June 2009). Understanding changes in how American households are giving can provide useful insights for donors, leaders, and policy makers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Heterogeneity and Giving: Evidence From U.S. Households Before and After the Great Recession of 2008
    (Sage, 2019-12) Osili, Una O.; Clark, Chelsea Jacqueline; Han, Xiao; Lilly Family School of Philanthropy
    Before the Great Recession of 2008, a stable two-thirds of the U.S. population donated to charitable causes in any given year. However, the fraction of American donors has declined by 11% since the Great Recession. In this article, we investigate pre- and postrecession charitable giving between 2000 to 2014. By examining household dynamics including race and ethnicity, age, gender, and educational attainment, this article uncovers changes in giving behaviors and provides new insights into how the Great Recession of 2008 affected both giving rates and amounts. It also discusses the implications for civil society and the need to build resilience for responding to future economic shocks.