Browsing by Subject "Patient-reported outcome measure"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cumulative Comorbidity Burden Does Not Worsen Outcomes in Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
    (Wiley, 2022) Gill, Amarbir S.; Mace, Jess C.; Rimmer, Ryan; Ramakrishnan, Vijay R.; Beswick, Daniel M.; Soler, Zachary M.; Manor, James; Orlandi, Richard R.; Smith, Timothy L.; Alt, Jeremiah A.; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: The impact of multiple coexisting medical comorbidities on treatment outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is unknown. In this study we sought to evaluate the effect of comorbidities on sinonasal quality of life (QOL) and general health utility values by utilizing the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) in CRS patients. Methods: Patients with CRS were prospectively enrolled in a cross-sectional study of medical and surgical therapies. The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 6D (SF-6D) scores were recorded at enrollment and 6-month follow-up; Lund-Kennedy endoscopy and Lund-Mackay computed tomography scores were recorded at enrollment. The FCI was calculated using the electronic medical record. The impact of cumulative comorbidity burden on baseline and posttreatment outcomes was assessed using univariate and bivariate correlations. Results: A total of 428 participants with CRS were included. The average (mean standard ± deviation) FCI score was 3.03 ± 2.28 (range, 0-12). Significant linear correlations were identified between increasing FCI score and baseline SNOT-22 and SF-6D scores (R = 0.166, p = 0.001 and R = -0.245, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no correlation between FCI and change in SNOT-22 or SF-6D scores after CRS treatment (R = 0.066, p = 0.17 and R = -0.087, p = 0.074, respectively). Achievement of a minimally clinically important difference was also independent of FCI. Conclusion: Although cumulative comorbidity burden, as measured by FCI, is associated with worse baseline SNOT-22 and SF-6D scores, it does not appear to limit posttreatment improvement in either outcome measure. On average, patients with high comorbidity burden report substantial improvement in both QOL and health utility after CRS treatment, similar to those with fewer comorbidities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Utility of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor as a Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring Tool in Older Injury Survivors
    (Elsevier, 2023) Fuchita, Mikita; Perkins, Anthony; Holler, Emma; Glober, Nancy; Lasiter, Sue; Mohanty, Sanjay; Ortiz, Damaris; Gao, Sujuan; French, Dustin D.; Boustani, Malaz; Zarzaur, Ben L.; Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor (HABC-M) as a patient-reported outcome tool to measure cognitive, functional, and psychological symptoms among older adults who sustained non-neurologic injuries requiring hospital admission. Methods: We used data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of the HABC-M Self-Report version in older patients recovering from traumatic injuries. A total of 143 patients without cognitive impairment were included in the analysis. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the internal consistency, and Spearman's rank correlation test was used to evaluate the relationship of the HABC-M with standard measures of cognitive, functional, and psychological outcomes. Results: The HABC-M subscales and the total scale showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.64 to 0.77). The HABC-M cognitive subscale did not correlate with the Mini-Mental State Examination. The HABC-M functional and psychological subscales correlated with corresponding standard reference measures (|rs| = 0.24-0.59). Conclusions: The HABC-M Self-Report version is a practical alternative to administering multiple surveys to monitor functional and psychological sequelae in older patients recovering from recent non-neurologic injuries. Its clinical application may facilitate personalized, multidisciplinary care coordination among older trauma survivors without cognitive impairment.