Browsing by Subject "Patient outcomes"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Eye on the Prize: Patient Outcomes Research in Medical Education
    (American Thoracic Society, 2023-09-27) Cooper, Avraham Z.; Jain, Snigdha; Santhosh, Lekshmi; Carlos, W. Graham, III; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The overarching goal of medical education is to train clinicians who achieve and maintain competence in patient care. Although the field of medical education research has acknowledged the importance of education on clinical practices and outcomes, most research endeavors continue to focus on learner-centered outcomes, such as knowledge and attitudes. The absence of clinical and patient-centered outcomes in pulmonary and critical care medicine medical education research has been attributed to barriers at multiple levels, including financial, methodological, and practical considerations. This Perspective explores clinical outcomes relevant to pulmonary and critical care medicine educational research and offers strategies and solutions that educators can use to accomplish what many consider the “prize” of medical education research: an understanding of how our educational initiatives impact the health of patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Outcomes of orthopaedic surgery in Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: a scoping review
    (Springer Nature, 2024-10-24) Schubart, Jane R.; Mills, Susan E.; Rodeo, Scott A.; Francomano, Clair A.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) often experience high rates of joint subluxations and dislocations, and associated pain that may require surgical interventions. Orthopaedic surgical management is challenging in this population, and patients will often undergo multiple unsuccessful surgeries. Outcomes data specific to patients with EDS are sparse in the orthopaedic surgery literature. We conducted a scoping review to evaluate the evidence and outcomes for orthopaedic surgery specifically for the EDS population. Methods: PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), CINHL, and Scopus from their inception to February 28, 2024 for all studies that reported outcomes for orthopaedic surgery in patients with EDS. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality, and extracted data. Methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The studies in this scoping review include Level III (retrospective cohort and case control) and Level IV (case series) evidence. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 71 citations published between 1990 and 2023. All were primary studies. 38 were single case studies, 14 were case series, and 19 were retrospective cohort studies. No randomized clinical studies or systematic reviews were identified. Overall, the reported findings for the various anatomical sites and procedures indicated that surgery outcomes were inconsistent. Our review highlights the need for future research to determine whether currently established surgical approaches for various orthopaedic conditions offer long-term clinical benefit in patients with EDS. This is clearly a challenging diagnosis, and more rigorous clinical studies are required to identify optimal treatment approaches. Conclusions: Our review found little evidence-based research to guide optimal surgical treatment in EDS. Established surgical techniques that have been shown to be successful in the wider orthopaedic population should be studied to determine their efficacy in the EDS population.