Browsing by Subject "Patient care team"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A comparison of self-reported and phone-based fidelity for Assertive Community Treatment (ACT): A pilot study in Indiana
    (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) McGrew, John H.; White, Laura M.; Stull, Laura G.; Wright-Berryman, Jennifer; Psychology, School of Science
    Objective: Monitoring fidelity of assertive community treatment (ACT) teams is costly. This study investigated the reliability and validity of a less burdensome approach: self-reported assessment. Methods: Phone-administered and self-reported assessments were compared for 16 ACT teams. Team leaders completed a self-report protocol providing information sufficient to score the Dartmouth Assertive Community Treatment Scale (DACTS). Two raters scored the DACTS using only self-reported information. Two additional raters conducted phone interviews with team leaders, verifying the self-reported data, and independently scored the DACTS. Results: DACTS total scores obtained via self-reported assessments were reliable and valid compared with phone-administered assessment on the basis of interrater consistency (intraclass correlation) and consensus (mean rating differences). Phone-administered assessments agreed with self-reported assessments within .25 scale points (out of 5 points) for 15 of 16 teams. Conclusions: A self-report approach could address concerns regarding costs of monitoring as part of a stepped approach to quality assurance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Best Practices for Health Informatician Involvement in Interprofessional Health Care Teams
    (Thieme, 2018-01) Holden, Richard J.; Binkheder, Samar; Patel, Jay; Viernes, Sara Helene P.; BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing
    Academic and nonacademic health informatics (HI) professionals (informaticians) serve on interprofessional health care teams with other professionals, such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dentists, and nutritionists. Presently, we argue for investing greater attention to the role health informaticians play on interprofessional teams and the best practices to support this role.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Closer to or Farther away from an Ideal Model of Care? Lessons Learned from Geographic Cohorting
    (Springer, 2022-09) Kara, Areeba; Kashiwagi, Deanne; Burden, Marisha; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Geographic "cohorting," "co-location," "regionalization," or "localization" refers to the assignation of a hospitalist team to a specific inpatient unit. Its benefits may be related to the formation of a team and the additional interventions like interdisciplinary rounding that the enhanced proximity facilitates. However, cohorting is often adopted in isolation of the bundled approach within which it has proven beneficial. Cohorting may also be associated with unintended consequences such as increased interruptions and increased indirect care time. Institutions may increase patient loads in anticipation of the efficiency gained by cohorting-leading to further increases in interruptions and time away from the bedside. Fragmented attention and increases in indirect care may lead to a perception of increased workload, errors, and burnout. As hospital medicine evolves, there are lessons to be learned by studying cohorting. Institutions and inpatient units should work in synergy to shape the day-to-day work which directly affects patient and clinician outcomes-and ultimately culminates in the success or failure of the parent organization. Such synergy can manifest in workflow design and metric selection. Attention to workloads and adopting the principles of continuous quality improvement are also crucial to developing models of care that deliver excellent care.