Browsing by Subject "Papillomavirus vaccines"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Assessment of the willingness of dentists in the state of Indiana to administer vaccines(Public Library of Science, 2022-04-19) Shukla, Anubhuti; Welch, Kelly; Villa, Alessandro; Dental Public Health and Dental Informatics, School of DentistryBackground: Human Papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal cancers have been on the rise in the past three decades. Dentists are uniquely positioned to discuss vaccination programs with their patients. The goal of this project was to assess the readiness of dentists in the state of Indiana in being able to administer vaccines. Methods: An 18-question online survey was sent to licensed dentists in the state of Indiana. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square tests, followed by multivariable analyses using ordinal logistic regression were conducted to assess providers' comfort levels and willingness to administer vaccines in both children and adults, by provider characteristics (practice type, location, and years in practice). Results: A total of 569 completed surveys were included for data analyses. Most dentists (58%) responded positively when asked if they would consider offering vaccinations in their office, if allowed by state legislation. In general, dentists working in academic settings and federally qualified health centers were more agreeable to offering vaccination in their practice. The level of agreement with "Dentists should be allowed to administer HPV, Influenza, Hep A and COVID 19 vaccines" for both children and adults decreased with increased years of practice. More than half of the respondents (55%) agreed that dental providers were competent to administer vaccines and needed no further training. Conclusion: The study results suggest the willingness of dentists in the state of Indiana to offer vaccinations in their practices, if allowed by legislation. Practical implications: Dental providers can be a unique resource to add to workforce for improving vaccination efforts.Item Clarification on the impact of cervarix vaccination on human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer in the United Kingdom(Taylor & Francis, 2016-07-02) Brown, Darron; Kulkarni, Amit Sharad; Pillsbury, Matt; Luxembourg, Alain; Saah, Alfred; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineItem Differences in cervical cancer screening knowledge, practices, and beliefs: An examination of survey responses(Elsevier, 2016-12-21) Kasting, Monica L.; Wilson, Shannon; Zollinger, Terrell W.; Dixon, Brian E.; Stupiansky, Nathan W.; Zimet, Gregory D.; Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public HealthAmong the identified barriers to HPV vaccination is the concern that women may compensate for their reduced susceptibility to cervical cancers by reducing cervical cancer screening. This exploratory study examined the relationship between cervical cancer screening rates and HPV vaccination. We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a convenience sample of women aged 21-35 attending a local minority health fair in July 2015. Data were analyzed in 2015-2016. Outcomes assessed were: receiving a Pap test within the last three years, awareness and comfort with current Pap test recommendations, and knowledge regarding the purpose of a Pap test. A total of 291 women were included in the analyses. Mean age was 28.5 years and 62% were non-Hispanic black. 84% had received a Pap test in the last three years and 33% had received at least one HPV vaccine. Logistic regression results showed that women who had been vaccinated did not have lower odds of having a Pap test in the past three years (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.66-2.65). In an adjusted regression model controlling for age and race, vaccinated women were significantly more likely to have had a Pap test (AOR = 3.06; 95% CI = 1.37-6.83). Yet only 26% of women knew the purpose of a Pap test and the proportion who answered correctly was higher among non-Hispanic white women. Women who have been vaccinated for HPV are more likely to have been screened for cervical cancer. These results suggest areas for more robust studies examining pro-health attitudes, behaviors, and communication regarding vaccination and preventive screening.Item Effect of a School-Based Educational Intervention About the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine on Psychosocial Outcomes Among Adolescents: Analysis of Secondary Outcomes of a Cluster Randomized Trial(American Medical Association, 2021-11-01) Davies, Cristyn; Marshall, Helen S.; Zimet, Gregory; McCaffery, Kirsten; Brotherton, Julia M.L.; Kang, Melissa; Garland, Suzanne; Kaldor, John; McGeechan, Kevin; Skinner, S. Rachel; Pediatrics, School of MedicineImportance: Delivery of vaccination to adolescents via a school-based program provides an opportunity to promote their involvement in health decision-making, service provision, and self-efficacy (belief in one's ability to perform a certain behavior). Objective: To examine the effect of a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination education and logistical intervention on adolescent psychosocial outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: In this cluster randomized trial and process and qualitative evaluation, adolescents aged 12 to 13 years (first year of high school) were recruited at high schools in Western Australia (WA) and South Australia (SA) in 2013 and 2014. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2016 to December 2020. Interventions: The complex intervention consisted of an adolescent intervention to promote knowledge and psychosocial outcomes, shared decisional support tool, and logistical strategies. Main outcomes and measures: Prespecified secondary outcomes were assessed. The HPV Adolescent Vaccination Intervention Questionnaire (HAVIQ) was used to measure changes in adolescent knowledge (6-item subscale), fear and anxiety (6-item subscale), self-efficacy (5-item subscale), and decision-making (8-item subscale). The hypothesis was that the intervention would improve adolescent involvement in vaccine decision-making (measured before dose 1 only), improve vaccine-related self-efficacy, and reduce vaccine-related fear and anxiety (measured before doses 1, 2, and 3). Mean (SD) scores for each subscale were compared between intervention and control students. In the process evaluation, focus groups were conducted. Analyses of the HAVIQ data were conducted from 2016 to 2020. Qualitative analyses of the focus groups were undertaken from 2017 to 2020. Results: The trial included 40 schools (21 intervention and 19 control) across sectors with 6967 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 13.70 [0.45] years). There were 3805 students (1689 girls and 2116 boys) in the intervention group and 3162 students (1471 girls and 1691 boys) in the control group. The overall response rate for the HAVIQ was 55%. In WA, where parental consent was required, the response rate was 35% (1676 of 4751 students); in SA, where parental consent was not required, it was 97% (2166 of 2216 students). The mean (SD) score for decision-making in the intervention group before dose 1 was 3.50 (0.42) of 5 points and 3.40 (0.40) in the control group, a small but significant difference of 0.11 point (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.16 point; P < .001). There was a small difference in favor of the intervention group in reduced vaccination-related anxiety (pre-dose 1 difference, -0.11 point [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.02 point]; pre-dose 2 difference, -0.18 point [95% CI, -0.26 to -0.10 point]; pre-dose 3 difference, -0.18 [95% CI, -0.24 to -0.11]) and increased vaccination self-efficacy (pre-dose 1 difference, 4.0 points; [95% CI, 1.0 to 7.0 points]; pre-dose 2 difference, 4.0 points [95% CI, 2.0 to 6.0 points]; pre-dose 3 difference, 3.0 points [95% CI, 1.0 to 5.0 points]). Focus group data from 111 adolescents in 6 intervention and 5 control schools revealed more confidence and less anxiety with each vaccine dose. Conclusions and relevance: In this cluster randomized trial, there was a small difference in adolescent decisional involvement and vaccine-related confidence and reduced vaccination-related fear and anxiety that was maintained throughout the vaccine course in the intervention vs control groups. Guidelines for vaccination at school should incorporate advice regarding how this outcome can be achieved.Item Health care providers’ perceptions of use and influence of clinical decision support reminders: qualitative study following a randomized trial to improve HPV vaccination rates(BMC, 2017-08-10) Dixon, Brian E.; Kasting, Monica L.; Wilson, Shannon; Kulkarni, Amit; Zimet, Gregory D.; Downs, Stephen M.; Epidemiology, School of Public HealthBackground Human Papillomavirus (HPV) leads to serious health issues and remains the most common sexually transmitted infection. Despite availability of effective vaccines, HPV vaccination rates are suboptimal. Furthermore, providers recommend the HPV vaccine less than half the time for eligible patients. Prior informatics research has demonstrated the effectiveness of computer-based clinical decision support (CDS) in changing provider behavior, especially in the area of preventative services. Methods Following a randomized clinical trial to test the effect of a CDS intervention on HPV vaccination rates, we conducted semi-structured interviews with health care providers to understand whether they noticed the CDS reminders and why providers did or did not respond to the prompts. Eighteen providers, a mix of medical doctors and nurse practitioners, were interviewed from five publicly-funded, urban health clinics. Interview data were qualitatively analyzed by two independent researchers using inductive content analysis. Results While most providers recalled seeing the CDS reminders, few of them perceived the intervention as effective in changing their behavior. Providers stated many reasons for why they did not perceive a change in their behavior, yet the results of the trial showed HPV vaccination rates increased as a result of the intervention. Conclusions CDS reminders may be effective at changing provider behavior even if providers perceive them to be of little use. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02551887 , Registered on September 15, 2015 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0521-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Item Human papillomavirus vaccine-related risk perceptions and subsequent sexual behaviors and sexually transmitted infections among vaccinated adolescent women(Elsevier, 2016-07-25) Kowalczyk Mullins, Tanya L.; Zimet, Gregory D.; Rosenthal, Susan L.; Morrow, Charlene; Ding, Lili; Huang, Bin; Kahn, Jessica A.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineOBJECTIVE: To examine the association between risk perceptions after human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and sexual behaviors and sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis over 30months following vaccination. METHODS: Participants included 112 sexually experienced girls aged 13-21years who were enrolled at the time of first HPV vaccination and completed ⩾2 of 4 follow-up visits at 2, 6, 18, 30months and including 30months. At each visit, participants completed surveys assessing risk perceptions (perceived need for safer sexual behaviors, perceived risk of STIs other than HPV) and sexual behaviors. STI testing was done at 6, 18, and 30months. Outcomes were condom use at last intercourse with main male partner, number of sexual partners since last study visit, and STI diagnosis. Associations between risk perceptions and sexual behaviors/STIs were examined using generalized linear mixed models. RESULTS: Mean age was 17.9years; 88% were Black; 49% had a history of STI at baseline. Scale scores for perceived need for safer sexual behaviors did not change significantly over time. Scale scores for perceived risk of STIs other than HPV significantly changed (p=0.027), indicating that girls perceived themselves to be more at risk of STIs other than HPV over 30months following vaccination. Multivariable models demonstrated that greater perceived need for safer sexual behaviors following vaccination was associated with condom use (p=0.002) but not with number of partners or STI diagnosis. Perceived risk of STIs other than HPV was not associated with the three outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that perceived risk for STIs other than HPV was not associated with subsequent sexual behaviors or STI diagnosis is reassuring. The association between perceived need for safer sexual behaviors and subsequent condom use suggests that the HPV vaccination visit is an important opportunity to reiterate the importance of safer sexual behaviors to sexually experienced girls.Item Obstetrician/gynecologists' HPV vaccination recommendations among women and girls 26 and younger(Elsevier, 2022-03-15) Brennan, Luke P.; Rodriguez, Natalia M.; Head, Katharine J.; Zimet, Gregory D.; Kasting, Monica L.; Communication Studies, School of Liberal ArtsBackground: Obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) are well poised to vaccinate girls and young women against HPV, however little is known about if and how they recommend the HPV vaccine. This study aims to understand factors associated with strong and frequent HPV vaccine recommendations among OB/GYNs for patients 26 years and younger. Methods: 224 practicing U.S. OB/GYNs were surveyed for how strongly and frequently they recommend the HPV vaccine to patients 26 and younger. Provider beliefs, knowledge, and preferences surrounding the vaccine, as well as clinic and patient-level variables were examined as covariates. We then examined the relationships using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Of the 224 respondents, 205 were included in the analysis, with 57% (n = 116) reporting strongly and frequently recommending the HPV vaccination to eligible patients 26 and younger. The regression showed two provider beliefs and two clinic-level attributes to be strongly associated with strong and frequent recommendations. Being a strong and frequent recommender was positively associated with believing other gynecologists frequently recommend the vaccine (aOR 24.33 95%CI[2.56-231.14]) and believing that 50% or more of their patients are interested in receiving the vaccine (aOR 2.77 95%CI[1.25-6.13]). The clinic-level attributes were having the vaccine stocked (aOR 2.66 95%CI[1.02-6.93]) and suburban (aOR 3.31 95%CI[1.07-10.19]) or urban (aOR 3.54 95%CI[1.07-11.76]) location versus rural. Conclusions: These findings suggest that OB/GYN peer support and educating OB/GYN about patients' interest in HPV vaccination may improve HPV vaccination. This work can inform clinic-level interventions including stocking the vaccine and focusing improvement efforts on rural clinics.Item Sexual Network Patterns and their Association with Genital and Anal Human Papillomavirus Infection in Adolescent and Young Men(Elsevier, 2021) Rosen, Brittany L.; Gorbach, Pamina; Ding, Lili; Covert, Courtney; Ermel, Aaron C.; Chandler, Emmanuel; Malagón, Talía; Kahn, Jessica A.; Medicine, School of MedicinePurpose: This study aimed to determine individual- and partner-level factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in vaccinated and unvaccinated men. Methods: A total of 747 men, aged 13-26 years, completed a survey of sexual behaviors and were tested for genital and perianal/anal HPV (36 types). Sexual network variables included recent and lifetime concurrency (being in more than one sexual relationship at the same time) and recent sex partner discordance (by race, ethnicity, age, and number of sexual partners). We determined individual-level and sexual network variables associated with ≥1 HPV type and HPV16/18, stratified by vaccination status, using separate multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Participants' mean age was 21.2 years; 64% were positive for ≥1 HPV type and 21% for HPV16/18. Factors associated with ≥1 HPV type in unvaccinated men included recruitment site and lifetime concurrency. Factors associated with ≥1 HPV type among vaccinated men included recruitment site, Chlamydia history, main male partner, number of lifetime female partners, and no condom use with female partner. Factors associated with HPV16/18 in unvaccinated men included race and partner concurrency. Factors associated with HPV16/18 in vaccinated men included ethnicity, main male partner, and recent concurrency. Conclusions: Sexual network variables associated with HPV infection were different based on vaccination status and HPV type, suggesting risk factors for HPV infection may change as the proportion of vaccinated men increases. In addition, participant report of concurrency and not knowing whether one had practiced concurrency were consistent risk factors; clinicians should consider including concurrency in the sexual history to determine the risk of HPV.Item The tumor suppressing roles of tissue structure in cervical cancer development(2012-12) Nguyen, Hoa Bich; Quilliam, Lawrence; Brutkiewicz, Randy R.; Harrington, Maureen A.; Kapur, Reuben; Wells, Clark D.Cervical cancer is caused by the persistent infection of human papilloma virus (HPV) in the cervix epithelium. Although effective preventative care is available, the widespread nature of infection and the variety of HPV strains unprotected by HPV vaccines necessitate a better understanding of the disease for development of new therapies. A major tumor suppressing mechanism is the inhibition of cell division by tissue structure; however, the underlining molecular circuitry for this regulation remains unclear. Recently, the Yap transcriptional co-activator has emerged as a key growth promoter that mediates contact growth arrest and limits organ size. Thus, we aimed to uncover upstream signals that connect tissue organization to Yap regulation in the inhibition of cervical cancer. Two events that disrupt tissue structure were examined including the loss of the tumor suppressor LKB1 and the expression of the viral oncogene HPV16-E6. We identified that Yap mediates cell growth regulation downstream of both LKB1 and E6. Restoration of LKB1 expression in HeLa cervical cancer cells, which lack this tumor suppressor, or shRNA knockdown of LKB1 in NTERT immortalized normal human dermal keratinocytes, demonstrated that LKB1 promotes Yap phosphorylation, nuclear exclusion, and proteasomal degradation. The ability of phosphorylation-defective Yap mutants to rescue LKB1 phenotypes, such as reduced cell proliferation and cell size, suggest that Yap inhibition contributes to LKB1 tumor suppressor function(s). Interestingly, LKB1’s suppression of Yap activity required neither the canonical Yap kinases, Lats1/2, nor metabolic downstream targets of LKB1, AMPK and mTORC1. Instead, the scaffolding protein NF2 was required for LKB1 to induce a specific actin cytoskeleton structure that associates with Yap suppression. Meanwhile, HPV16-E6 promoted Yap activation in all stages of keratinocyte differentiation. E6 activated the Rap1 small GTPase, which in turn promoted Yap activity. Since Rap1 does not mediate differentiation inhibition caused by E6, E6 may play a role in promoting cell growth through Rap1-Yap activation rather than preventing growth arrest through the disruption of differentiation. Altogether, the LKB1-NF2-Yap and E6-Rap1-Yap pathways represent two examples of a novel phenomenon, whereby the structure of a cell directly influences its gene expression and proliferation.