Browsing by Subject "Pain treatment"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Bias in pain care: What patient variables do providers report as influencing their treatment decisions?
    (2024-10) Rose-McCandlish, Margaret; Hirsh, Adam; Mosher, Catherine; Stewart, Jesse
    Racialized and low socioeconomic status (SES) patients are often under-treated for chronic pain, despite reporting more pain on average. This disparity is likely due to multiple systemic factors, including healthcare provider bias. Providers often treat patients differently for chronic pain depending on the patient’s race and SES, but little is known about providers’ awareness of the extent to which patient demographic variables influence their pain treatment decisions. The present study examined the variables that providers report as influencing their pain treatment decisions, whether these variables group together to form distinct factors, and whether providers who demonstrate racial or socioeconomic bias in their treatment decisions report different patient variables or factors as influencing their treatment decisions compared to providers who did not demonstrate biases. Four hundred thirty-two United States-based physician residents and fellows (“providers”) made treatment decisions for 12 computer-simulated patients with chronic pain who varied by race (Black/White) and SES (high/low). Providers then rated the level to which 15 different variables influenced their treatment decision-making. Robust repeated measures ANOVAs indicated that providers rated patient sex/gender, age, and race as the least influential variables in their pain treatment decisions for the simulated patients. For the factor analysis, I sequentially omitted variables to achieve proper model fit and reliability and arrived at a three-factor solution; I labelled these factors Demographic, Biomedical, and Psychosocial, according to the variables’ conceptual overlap. Robust repeated measures ANOVAs found that reported use of variables did not differ between the providers who demonstrated bias and those who did not demonstrate bias, nor did factor scores for the three factors. The present study suggests that providers have low awareness of the extent to which patient race and SES may influence their clinical decision-making in pain care. Results can help inform future research to improve interventions to reduce the impact of racial and socioeconomic bias on providers’ treatment decisions for patients with chronic pain.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Electrophysiological and Pharmacological Properties of the Neuronal Voltage-gated Sodium Channel Subtype Nav1.7
    (2007-12) Sheets, Patrick L.; Cummins, Theodore R.; Nicol, Grant D.; Oxford, Gerry S.; Vasko, Michael R.; Schild, John H.
    Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) are transmembrane proteins responsible for the initiation of action potentials in excitable tissues by selectively allowing Na+ to flow through the cell membrane. VGSC subtype Nav1.7 is highly expressed in nociceptive (pain-sensing) neurons. It has recently been shown that individuals lacking the Nav1.7 subtype do not experience pain but otherwise function normally. In addition, dysfunction of Nav1.7 caused by point mutations in the channel is involved in two inherited pain disorders, primary erythromelalgia (PE) and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder (PEPD). This indicates Nav1.7 is a very important component in nociception. The aims of this dissertation were to 1) investigate if the antipsychotic drug, trifluoperazine (TFP), could modulate Nav1.7 current; 2) examine changes in Nav1.7 properties produced by the PE mutation N395K including sensitivity to the local anesthetic (LA), lidocaine; and 3) determine how different inactivated conformations of Nav1.7 affect lidocaine inhibition on the channel using PEPD mutations (I1461T and T1464I) that alter transitions between the different inactivated configurations of Nav1.7. Standard whole-cell electrophysiology was used to determine electrophysiological and pharmacological changes in WT and mutant sodium currents. Results from this dissertation demonstrate 1) TFP inhibits Nav1.7 channels through the LA interaction site; 2) the N395K mutation alters electrophysiological properties of Nav1.7 and decreases channel sensitivity to the local anesthetic lidocaine; and 3) lidocaine stabilizes Nav1.7 in a configuration that decreases transition to the slow inactivated state of the channel. Overall, this dissertation answers important questions regarding the pharmacology of Nav1.7 and provides insight into the changes in Nav1.7 channel properties caused by point mutations that may contribute to abnormal pain sensations. The results of this dissertation on the function and pharmacology of the Nav1.7 channel are crucial to the understanding of pain pathophysiology and will provide insight for the advancement of pain management therapies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pain clinic definitions in the medical literature and U.S. state laws: an integrative systematic review and comparison
    (BMC, 2018-05-22) Andraka-Christou, Barbara; Rager, Joshua B.; Brown-Podgorski, Brittany; Silverman, Ross D.; Watson, Dennis P.; Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health
    BACKGROUND: In response to widespread opioid misuse, ten U.S. states have implemented regulations for facilities that primarily manage and treat chronic pain, called "pain clinics." Whether a clinic falls into a state's pain clinic definition determines the extent to which it is subject to oversight. It is unclear whether state pain clinic definitions model those found in the medical literature, and potential differences lead to discrepancies between scientific and professionally guided advice found in the medical literature and actual pain clinic practice. Identifying discrepancies could assist states to design laws that are more compatible with best practices suggested in the medical literature. METHODS: We conducted an integrative systematic review to create a taxonomy of pain clinic definitions using academic medical literature. We then identified existing U.S. state pain clinic statutes and regulations and compared the developed taxonomy using a content analysis approach to understand the extent to which medical literature definitions are reflected in state policy. RESULTS: In the medical literature, we identified eight categories of pain clinic definitions: 1) patient case mix; 2) single-modality treatment; 3) multidisciplinary treatment; 4) interdisciplinary treatment; 5) provider supervision; 6) provider composition; 7) marketing; and 8) outcome. We identified ten states with pain clinic laws. State laws primarily include the following definitional categories: patient case mix; single-modality treatment, and marketing. Some definitional categories commonly found in the medical literature, such as multidisciplinary treatment and interdisciplinary treatment, rarely appear in state law definitions. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to our knowledge to develop a taxonomy of pain clinic definitions and to identify differences between pain clinic definitions in U.S. state law and medical literature. Future work should explore the impact of different legal pain clinic definitions on provider decision-making and state-level health outcomes.