Browsing by Subject "POLST"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessing Evidence for Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Programs
    (JAMA, 2016-06) Tolle, Susan W.; Moss, Alvin H.; Hickman, Susan E.; IU School of Nursing
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    POLST Is More Than a Code Status Order Form: Suggestions for Appropriate POLST Use in Long-Term Care
    (Elsevier, 2021-08) Hickman, Susan E.; Steinberg, Karl; Carney, John; Lum, Hillary D.; School of Nursing
    POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) is a medical order form used to document preferences about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), medical interventions such as hospitalization, care in the intensive care unit, and/or ventilation, as well as artificial nutrition. Programs based on the POLST paradigm are used in virtually every state under names that include POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment), MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment), and MOST (Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment), and these forms are used in the care of hundreds of thousands of geriatric patients every year. Although POLST is intended for persons who are at risk of a life-threatening clinical event due to a serious life-limiting medical condition, some nursing homes and residential care settings use POLST to document CPR preferences for all residents, resulting in potentially inappropriate use with patients who are ineligible because they are too healthy. This article focuses on reasons that POLST is used as a default code status order form, the risks associated with this practice, and recommendations for nursing homes to implement appropriate use of POLST.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reasons for Discordance Between Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences and Medical Orders in Nursing Facilities Without POLST
    (Sage, 2023) Heim Smith, Nicholette L.; Sudore, Rebecca L.; Myers, Anne L.; Hammes, Bernard J.; Hickman, Susan E.; School of Nursing
    Background: Life-sustaining treatment (LST) orders are important communication tools used to ensure preference-concordant care at the end of life. Recent studies reveal concerning rates of discordance between current preferences and documented LST orders, especially in nursing facilities without POLST. Reasons for discordance in facilities using POLST have been explored, however the majority of nursing facilities in the United States do not yet use the POLST form. Design: Qualitative descriptive study using constant comparative analysis. Setting: Nursing facilities in Indiana (n = 6) not using POLST. Participants: Residents (n = 15) and surrogate decision-makers of residents without decisional capacity (n = 15) with discordance between current preferences and documented LST orders. Measurements: Do not resuscitate, do not hospitalize (DNH), and do not intubate (DNI) orders were extracted from medical charts. Current preferences were elicited using the Respecting Choices Advanced Steps model. A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore reasons for discordance between current preferences and LST orders. Results: Reasons for discordance included: (1) inadequate information about the range of available LST options, what each involves, and how to formally communicate preferences; (2) no previous discussion with facility staff; (3) no documentation of previously expressed preferences; and (4) family involvement. Conclusion: Reasons for discordance between expressed preferences and LST orders suggest that in facilities without a uniform and systematic LST order documentation strategy like POLST, these conversations may not occur and/or be documented. Staff should be aware that residents and surrogates may have preferences about LSTs that require strategic solicitation and documentation.