Browsing by Subject "Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Early coronary angiography and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (BMJ Publishing Group, 2018-10-19) Khera, Rohan; CarlLee, Sheena; Blevins, Amy E.; Schweizer, Marin; Girotra, Saket; Ruth Lilly Medical Library, School of Medicine
    Background: Although acute myocardial infarction is a common cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), the role of early coronary angiography in OHCA remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies to determine the association of early coronary angiography with survival in OHCA. Methods: We searched multiple electronic databases for published studies on early coronary angiography in OHCA between 1 January 1990 and 18 January 2017. Studies were included if (1) restricted to only OHCA, (2) included an exposure group that underwent early coronary angiography within 1  day of arrest onset and a concurrent control group that did not undergo early coronary angiography, and (3) reported survival outcomes. We used a random-effects model to obtain pooled OR. I2 statistics and Cochran's Q test were used to determine between-study heterogeneity. Results: A total of 17 studies with 14 972 patients were included, of whom 6424 (44%) received early coronary angiography. Early coronary angiography was associated with higher odds of survival (pooled OR 2.54 (95% CI 1.94 to 3.33)) and survival with favourable neurological outcome (pooled OR 2.37 (95%  CI 1.71 to 3.28)). However, there was substantial heterogeneity in our pooled estimate (I2=88%  and p value for Cochran's test <0.0001 for both outcomes). The large heterogeneity in pooled estimates was reduced after including adjusted estimates when available, and was explained by differences in methodological rigour and characteristics of included studies. Conclusion: Among patients resuscitated from OHCA, early coronary angiography is associated with increased survival to discharge and favourable neurological outcome.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care in Detroit
    (Elsevier, 2021) Mathew, Shobi; Harrison, Nicholas; Chalek, Adam D.; Gorelick, Damon; Brennan, Erin; Wise, Stefanie; Gandolfo, Lauren; O'Neil, Brian; Dunne, Robert; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Detroit, an earlier termination of resuscitation protocol was initiated in March 2020. To characterize pre-hospital cardiac arrest careduring COVID-19 in Detroit, we analyzed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) rate of ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) and patient characteristics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: OHCA data was analyzed between March 10th, 2020 - April 30th, 2020 and March 10th, 2019 - April 30th, 2019. ROSC, patient demographics, arrest location, initial rhythms, bystander CPR and field termination were compared before and during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare arrest characteristics between years, and the odds of achieving vs. not achieving ROSC. 2020 vs. 2019 as a predictor for ROSC was assessed with logistic regression. Results: 471 patients were included. Arrests increased to 291 during the pandemic vs. 180 in 2019 (62% increase). Age (mean difference + 6; 95% CI: +2.4 to +9.5), arrest location (nursing home OR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.42-4.31; public place OR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.25-0.88), BLS response (OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-0.99), and field termination of resuscitation (OR = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.36-4.07) differed significantly in 2020 compared to 2019. No significant difference was found in the confounder-adjusted odds of ROSC in 2020 vs 2019 (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.34-1.11). Conclusion: OHCA increased by 62% during COVID-19 in Detroit, without a significant change in prehospital ROSC. The rate of ROSC remained similar despite the implementation of an early termination of resuscitation protocol in response to COVID-19.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose, adult survivors of after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    (Research Square, 2024-06-21) Meurer, William; Schmitzberger, Florian; Yeatts, Sharon; Ramakrishnan, Viswanathan; Abella, Benjamin; Aufderheide, Tom; Barsan, William; Benoit, Justin; Berry, Scott; Black, Joy; Bozeman, Nia; Broglio, Kristine; Brown, Jeremy; Brown, Kimberly; Carlozzi, Noelle; Caveney, Angela; Cho, Sung-Min; Chung-Esaki, Hangyul; Clevenger, Robert; Conwit, Robin; Cooper, Richelle; Crudo, Valentina; Daya, Mohamud; Harney, Deneil; Hsu, Cindy; Johnson, Nicholas J.; Khan, Imad; Khosla, Shaveta; Kline, Peyton; Kratz, Anna; Kudenchuk, Peter; Lewis, Roger J.; Madiyal, Chaitra; Meyer, Sara; Mosier, Jarrod; Mouammar, Marwan; Neth, Matthew; O'Neil, Brian; Paxton, James; Perez, Sofia; Perman, Sarah; Sozener, Cemal; Speers, Mickie; Spiteri, Aimee; Stevenson, Valerie; Sunthankar, Kavita; Tonna, Joseph; Youngquist, Scott; Geocadin, Romergryko; Silbergleit, Robert; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of both the heart and brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the United States. Induced cooling of comatose patients markedly improved neurological and functional outcomes in pivotal randomized clinical trials, but the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia has not yet been established. Methods: This study is a multi-center randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. We investigate two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest to ascertain the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS (modified Rankin Scale, a measure of neurologic disability), across the treatment arms. Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 hours of therapeutic cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 hours will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each initial cardiac rhythm type (shockable or non-shockable), by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. A maximum sample size of 1800 subjects is proposed. Secondary objectives are to characterize: the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling, the effect on neuropsychological outcomes, and the effect on patient reported quality of life measures. Discussion: In-vitro and in-vivo studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having a good outcome. If the treatment effect of cooling is increasing across duration, for at least some set of durations, then this provides evidence of the efficacy of cooling itself versus normothermia, even in the absence of a normothermia control arm, confirming previous RCTs for OHCA survivors of shockable rhythms and provides the first prospective controlled evidence of efficacy in those without initial shockable rhythms.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Treatment and Outcome Variation in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Among Four Urban Hospitals in Detroit
    (Elsevier, 2023) Mathew, Shobi; Harrison, Nicholas; Ajimal, Sukhwindar; Silvagi, Ryan; Reece, Ryan; Klausner, Howard; Levy, Phillip; Dunne, Robert; O’Neil, Brian; Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine
    Aims: To determine whether out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) post-resuscitation management and outcomes differ between four Detroit hospitals. Introduction: Significant variation exists in treatment/outcomes from OHCA. Disparities between hospitals serving a similar population is not well known. Methods: Retrospective OHCA data was collected from the Detroit-Cardiac Arrest Registry (DCAR) between January 2014 to December 2019. Four hospitals were compared on two treatments (angiography, do not resuscitate (DNR)) and two outcomes (cerebral performance category (CPC) ≤ 2, in-hospital death). Models for death and CPC were tested with and without coronary angiography and DNR status. Results: 999 patients at hospitals A - D differed (p < 0.05) before multivariable adjustment by age, race, witnessed arrest, dispatch-emergency department (ED) time, TTM, coronary angiography, DNR order, and in-hospital death. Rates of death and CPC ≤ 2 were worse in Hospital A (82.8%, 10%, respectively) compared to others (69.1%, 14.1%). After multivariable adjustment, Hospital A performed angiography less compared to B (OR = 0.17) and was more likely to initiate new DNR status than B (OR = 2.9), C (OR = 16.1), or D (OR = 3.6). CPC ≤ 2 were worse in Hospital A compared to B (OR = 0.27) and D (OR = 0.35). After sensitivity analysis, CPC ≤ 2 odds did not differ for A versus B (OR = 0.58, adjusted for angiography) or D (OR = 0.65, adjusted for DNR). Odds of death, despite angiography and DNR differences, were worse in Hospital A compared to B (OR = 1.87) and D (OR = 1.81). Conclusion: Differing rates of DNR and coronary angiography was associated with observed disparities in favorable neurologic outcome, but not death, between four Detroit hospitals.